is prohibited in the Netherlands.
Goodgame does earn money
1 can send gifts after players
2 buy and send gifts after players
3 buy and send equipment after players
4 everything you can send after another account
5 new update
- What kind of gifts are there?
* Nomads tablets boost = Khan box package
* Wasteland boost = Wasteland flags package
* Samurai points boost = Sam box package
* Samurai Elite points boost = Sam coins
package
* Berimond points boost = The pride of Beri
rig package
* Berimond Elite points boost = The splendor of
Beri rig package
* Ponytails = Pigtails package
Goodgame keep it in game to make money, but not get out
just works more until players start cheating
I'm going to start a lawsuit against Goodgame because they incite me to cheat
Incitement in criminal law
In the case of provocation it is important that the intention to commit the offense is awakened by the instigator to the unprovoked (the initiative therefore lies with the instigator).
Incitement in the law
Incitement is regulated in the Penal Code (Sr.) in Article 47 paragraph 1 sub 2:
1. If perpetrators of a criminal offense are punished:
(..)
2. those who intentionally provoke the offense by gifts, promises, abuse of authority, violence, threats or deception or by providing opportunity, means or intelligence.
2. With respect to the latter, only those actions that they have deliberately provoked, as well as their consequences, are taken into account.
Criteria provocation
For the acceptance of provocation, five conditions must be met;
1. Set up the trigger
2. Inciting someone else (instigator) gives the other person the idea (makes decisions) to commit the offense This does not exclude the possibility that circumstances other than (the use of) a triggering agent cooperate with that decision, provided that the triggering device is the decisive factor) .
3. Use of one or more triggers (gifts, promises)
4. Unprovoked offense must have been followed.
5. Excused must therefore be punishable.
and if you get caught by Goodgame an IP ban on without showing proof. because pure money wants to make Goodgame.
Goodgame I would like to see you in court
gr koos69
GGS does not show proof for banned offenses so that those being banned cannot avoid being banned in the future. This is standard practice for all online games.
Enjoy wasting your money on a lawsuit.
When GGE deliberatly sets their game up to offer massive advantages to those that cheat ie multis, then does nothing to discourage or stop this cheating, in fact it knowingly allows cheats to operate in the game year in year out. And it continues to set up the game so the multis continues to have an advantage. It could certainly be argued that GGE does nothing to discourage cheating in this regard. And is at best careless in its development in that they build in a motivation to cheat.
But yes for what its worth I hope you have exceptionally deep pockets for a law suit, and I dont rate your chances. I am not saying you have no chance, i dont think this particular case you have much chance but i think there are other things in which you could go after gge and have a much better chance of success. But realistically you would need to stumble up against an exceptionally senior judge, who was very well versed in this area of law, and who believed it was time for the industry in general to be much better regulated. And for them to be prepared to set some pretty historic prescedents.
I think one day that kind of law suit WILL come, but it will take someone very rich to bother to push it right to the highest court, and it need a very forward thinking judge who believes that the current TOS of game manufacturers are just a cop out to avoid their consumer obligations. And they will seek to ensure virtual spend is every bit as well regulated and consumer rights in this area are in line with the rest of consumer legislation.
But i dont see that kind of lawsuit on the horizon yet. But if you do good luck.
also entering new conditions are mistakes made by Goodgame
Yes, and when players take oath against the judge saying Goodgame have incited them to cheat and I already have players who are going to explain this.
you know we live in the Netherlands is forbidden provocation
and goodgame comes under Dutch law, offering in the Netherlands
In the Netherlands, the costs of litigation is nothing, no US
What does a lawyer cost anything he haha
if I can put money into an account, a lawyer can also join
if everyone leans back about nothing will change
What do I have to lose nothing hahaha
gr koos69
koos69 (NL1) said:yes, if everyone looks like this, Goodgame will continue to make money
also entering new conditions are mistakes made by Goodgame
Yes, and when players take oath against the judge saying Goodgame have incited them to cheat and I already have players who are going to explain this.
you know we live in the Netherlands is forbidden provocation
and goodgame comes under Dutch law, offering in the Netherlands
In the Netherlands, the costs of litigation is nothing, no US
What does a lawyer cost anything he haha
if I can put money into an account, a lawyer can also join
if everyone leans back about nothing will change
What do I have to lose nothing hahaha
gr koos69
Litigation always has costs.
also happy that nobody is above the law
Goodgame is not haha
now I have nothing in my hands
everything from me is win win at court that is the risk for Goodgame
provocation = forbidden in the Netherlands and that is what the law says
or Goodgame wants to change the law here as the conditions will be difficult story hahaha
GGE the initiative lies with the instigator,
in criminal law
In the case of provocation it is important that the intention to commit the offense is awakened by the instigator to the unprovoked (the initiative lies with the instigator).
Incitement in the law
Incitement is regulated in the Penal Code (Sr.) in Article 47 paragraph 1 sub 2:
1. If perpetrators of a criminal offense are punished:
(..)
2. those who intentionally provoke the offense by gifts, promises, abuse of authority, violence, threats or deception or by providing opportunity, means or intelligence.
2. With respect to the latter, only those actions that they have deliberately provoked, as well as their consequences, are taken into account.
Criteria provocation
For the acceptance of provocation, five conditions must be met;
1. Set up the trigger
2. Inciting someone else (instigator) gives the other person the idea (makes decisions) to commit the offense This does not exclude the possibility that circumstances other than (the use of) a triggering agent cooperate in that decision, provided that the triggering device is the decisive factor) .
3. Use of one or more triggers (gifts, promises)
4. Unprovoked offense must have been followed.
5. Excused must therefore be punishable.
Difference provoke and commit
The difference between provocation and committing is that when provoked the provoked (ie the perpetrator of the offense, the co-defendant) is also punishable. The real perpetrator of the offense is not punishable.
Difference provocation and complicity
The difference between provocation and complicity is that the instigation of committing the offense is aroused by the instigator in the provocation (the initiative lies with the instigator). In case of complicity, the intention to commit the offense already exists with the perpetrator (the plan does not come from the accomplice but from the perpetrator, the accomplice only provides assistance). In particular, the 'prior complicity' may in some situations be very similar to provocation.