Forum: empire-en
Board: [584] Players ask Players
[-76384]
phil66 [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 12:14 a.m.
Although he did send archers as part of his attack 
The flaming arrows and bulwarks helped of course...
Battle report in the attached files.
The flaming arrows and bulwarks helped of course...
Battle report in the attached files.
[1382489]
w0lf137 [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 12:45 a.m.
Why is that guy sending defensive units on the attack? That battle is lol.
[1382494]
Luke Fierysword [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 1:08 a.m.
How do you NOT win that battle? I could've won that with 50 of my soldiers....make that 30.
[1382495]
Aaa343 [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 1:10 a.m.
Why is that guy sending defensive units on the attack? That battle is lol.
yes, although you won against a player 10 levels above you, had he known how to attack, you would have been destroyed. hate to break it to you, but you won because the attacker cant read that archers and halberdiers are defenders, not because of your 50-0-50 defenses
[1382496]
phil66 [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 1:14 a.m.
yes, although you won against a player 10 levels above you, had he known how to attack, you would have been destroyed. hate to break it to you, but you won because the attacker cant read that archers and halberdiers are defenders, not because of your 50-0-50 defenses
Fair comment, I was lucky - but you can only work with what you've got. Now he has his mates attacking me with travelling troops - life goes on
. [1382524]
huzaifa memon (INT1) [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 2:54 a.m.
hehe! hope he burned well!
[1382526]
B.Stinson [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 3:03 a.m.
Even Swordsmen would of done better in that attack in the place of the Archers. That it self says a lot about this "attack"...
[1382582]
BobFighter834 (INT2) [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 8:20 a.m.
Tell the attacker to wait a few years before playing the game because they might be better at it once they're tall enough to see the computer screen.
Unless, of course, they had too many defenders and sent some in an attack against a low level. I once did that. Of course, I ended up winning with 30 archers against a level 15, but they all died eventually.
Unless, of course, they had too many defenders and sent some in an attack against a low level. I once did that. Of course, I ended up winning with 30 archers against a level 15, but they all died eventually.
[1382588]
xJadetsssx [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 8:24 a.m.
yes, although you won against a player 10 levels above you, had he known how to attack, you would have been destroyed. hate to break it to you, but you won because the attacker cant read that archers and halberdiers are defenders, not because of your 50-0-50 defenses
lol exactly
, you have to be pretty bad for attacking with soldiers with 10 of attack Power, that is one of the first things you learn in the game, attack with attackers, defend with defenders [1382590]
~Farsight~ [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 8:27 a.m.
xJadetsssx wrote: »lol exactly
true
but when you start do they not put archers on the flanks?
[1382624]
Helmler [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 9:58 a.m.
Even Swordsmen would of done better in that attack in the place of the Archers. That it self says a lot about this "attack"...
Are you sure you were being sarcastic before about swordsmen?
And either the attacker knows nothing about how to play this game or he was trying to sacrifice some troops/honour, either way I wouldn't be so proud of yourself phil, sorry. Not to say you don't know how to play this game, it looks like you do, but your attacker blatanly has no idea!
[1382641]
phil66 [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 11:38 a.m.
Are you sure you were being sarcastic before about swordsmen?
And either the attacker knows nothing about how to play this game or he was trying to sacrifice some troops/honour, either way I wouldn't be so proud of yourself phil, sorry. Not to say you don't know how to play this game, it looks like you do, but your attacker blatanly has no idea!
I wasn't so much proud, as relieved - if the big guys come after you there's not much you can do. The balance seems improved over previous games (ie: evony) but time, it seems, is the most valuable resource - unless you have a lot of rubies of course.
[1382704]
Joepaul [None]
:: Aug. 30, 2012, 3:51 p.m.
where is alliance located
[1388405]
DominickRuler [None]
:: Sept. 10, 2012, 12:01 p.m.
How do I place troops at the keep? This question might be low level for you, but I have been searching the forums and can't find how to do this. At the moment all at my keep are dummies....thank you for your hekp.
[1388418]
Helmler [None]
:: Sept. 10, 2012, 12:42 p.m.
Any troops that can't fit on the walls are placed in the keep. If you don't have troops there then need to recruit some more.
[1388451]
J.I. Joe2 [None]
:: Sept. 10, 2012, 3:50 p.m.
You can forget the 50-0-50 defense formation if the attacker uses 4 full waves on the walls backed up by tools.
[1388466]
BobFighter834 (INT2) [None]
:: Sept. 10, 2012, 4:45 p.m.
You can forget the 50-0-50 defense formation if the attacker uses 4 full waves on the walls backed up by tools.
Wave 4 isn't available until around ~level 50. What player attacks someone over 31 levels below them for no reason?
[1388647]
Lenzabi (US1) [None]
:: Sept. 11, 2012, 5:53 a.m.
Swordsmen, i do make them 2nd wave troops when attacking, usually the crossbows/macemen/2-hander swordsmen take the brunt in wave 1, the swordsmen are there as backup, and as extra loot carriers. Waiting to get heavy x-bows and longbows.
[1388649]
xJadetsssx [None]
:: Sept. 11, 2012, 6 a.m.
the swordmans have the worst looting capacity ever anyway
[1388749]
wise geo [None]
:: Sept. 11, 2012, 12:19 p.m.
Well the ATTACKER shuold have sent ESPIONAGES before ATTACK he should have seen
attackers on defensive so if i was him I would do THE SAME THING
so this 50-0-50 is just a COINCIDENCE
attackers on defensive so if i was him I would do THE SAME THING
so this 50-0-50 is just a COINCIDENCE