Forum: empire-en
Board: [584] Players ask Players
Topic: [76726] Capitals
[-76726]
_King_ [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 12:12 a.m.
I couldn't find any of the Q&A that will answer my questions so i will post it here . . .
I have noticed that all of the capitals i see happen to be right next ( or close ) to a level 60 alliances or castle like ben01 and a few others. Is this just a coincidence? And, do they just spawn randomly? Also, will more capitals come out as time goes on like when players join the game? Or are they are already here and you just have to find them?
Plus on a side note is there a capitol by 531/666 that is closer than 657/657 In USA 1
Thanks, _King_
I have noticed that all of the capitals i see happen to be right next ( or close ) to a level 60 alliances or castle like ben01 and a few others. Is this just a coincidence? And, do they just spawn randomly? Also, will more capitals come out as time goes on like when players join the game? Or are they are already here and you just have to find them?
Plus on a side note is there a capitol by 531/666 that is closer than 657/657 In USA 1
Thanks, _King_
[1386862]
kmkarr [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 12:39 a.m.
i hate how the high level alliances hav captured the capitals away its just unfair
[1386864]
J.I. Joe2 [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 12:46 a.m.
i hate how the high level alliances hav captured the capitals away its just unfair
War in big scale is starting. An alliance was a bit above 30 divisions is battling another with a bit over 50 divisions.
Might I add all high levels.
I'm not sure you really want in on that lol.
[1386870]
castle of saint [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 1:29 a.m.
ya this capital upgrade i think is just for the high alliances not small alliances like mine 
[1387221]
BobFighter834 (INT2) [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 6:22 p.m.
castle of saint wrote: »ya this capital upgrade i think is just for the high alliances not small alliances like mine
It is and it was designed to be. Tough luck for you and your alliance. Tough luck for me as well.
[1387296]
Emperor Zach [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 7:48 p.m.
i got messed up 2
[1387361]
_King_ [None]
:: Sept. 7, 2012, 10:36 p.m.
But can anyone answer my question?
[1387479]
_King_ [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 1:56 a.m.
How do I delete a quick reply?
[1387648]
J.I. Joe2 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 10:24 a.m.
How do I delete a quick reply?
You can only edit your post, not delete.
Moderators and above have the access to delete posts.
[1387651]
Helmler [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 10:38 a.m.
But can anyone answer my question?
CMs have said it's coincidence, and if it's not they are hardly going to post that here. I am therefore pressuming the locations are random (with the exception of 657:657, that seems true across all servers).
They have also said that more capitals will spawn as the server population increases. What we don't know is exactly how many there will be when the population reaches the limit, or what the relationship is between the two (i.e. 1 capital for every X players).
[1387793]
_King_ [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 4:54 p.m.
Ok, well lets I just hope more people join usa1 thx for the help
[1387910]
xtremehero10 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 10:30 p.m.
that is messed up and i was 1 that thought of the idea and put it on the forum and this is a stupid idea maken it for only big alliances
they need it to be scattered like outposts.....more of them.....and even where alliances arnt at
why just big alliances
or maybe where we allready own 1 as a new button on the alliance veiw
if your maken it for just them then we wont even get them when we get to level 60 because then the owners of them will be level 120 then
so how is this news for us if it was just for big alliances than why even put it in the news for little players in the first place
its the most unfair thing i have ever seen on empire
i hate this idea its the worst idea i ever seen on the entire goodgame studios
they need it to be scattered like outposts.....more of them.....and even where alliances arnt at
why just big alliances
or maybe where we allready own 1 as a new button on the alliance veiw
if your maken it for just them then we wont even get them when we get to level 60 because then the owners of them will be level 120 then
so how is this news for us if it was just for big alliances than why even put it in the news for little players in the first place
its the most unfair thing i have ever seen on empire
i hate this idea its the worst idea i ever seen on the entire goodgame studios
[1387911]
xtremehero10 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 10:32 p.m.
if you make it for little alliances to then we will like the idea....until then we all hate that idea the most
[1387919]
LegendaryKing64 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 11 p.m.
Well, I have just seen two examples of the Royal palace and they remind me of this place:
Big name alliances permanently living with Mickey, Minnie and Donald. I cannot stop laughing.
Big name alliances permanently living with Mickey, Minnie and Donald. I cannot stop laughing.
[1387922]
lewisj101 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 11:09 p.m.
Personally think this whole thing is a joke. Just another way for GGS to get money out of peoples pockets which, fair play, is sort of their jobs but its snubbing out all the other players who contribute to the game. Where would the big alliances be if some of their players decided they would play anymore and quit the game. If GGS dont look after their smaller players, the bigger players will have no one to pick on, therefore no more ruby purchases
[1387923]
LegendaryKing64 [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 11:12 p.m.
It will simply be a war between the biggest alliances which means end of pacts, and one big stalemate. At the end of the day, why keep the smaller alliances that don't buy rubies, when you can keep those who buy them on a regular basis i.e. 1,000 pounds worth at a time.
[1387927]
Baldrick (GB1) [None]
:: Sept. 8, 2012, 11:27 p.m.
LegendaryKing64 wrote: »Well, I have just seen two examples of the Royal palace and they remind me of this place:
Big name alliances permanently living with Mickey, Minnie and Donald. I cannot stop laughing.
I just found this image from an old GGS financial planning meeting from a couple of years ago.....
[1387996]
bizzen [None]
:: Sept. 9, 2012, 4:05 a.m.
lol that's funny
[1388019]
bobbysbro [None]
:: Sept. 9, 2012, 5:34 a.m.
i hate how the high level alliances hav captured the capitals away its just unfair
a low lvled alliance with low lvled members would never be able to supply and hold the capitol
[1546463]
Cra Z Guy [None]
:: May 3, 2013, 3:55 p.m.
?(I wonder why capitals can't level up! That is not cool to put "palace level 1" when it can't go to level 2!