Forum: empire-en

Board: [584] Players ask Players

Topic: [77676] Re-espionage ??

[-77676] Conqueror9 [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:38 a.m.

It seems I get some unknown from espionage

can i re-send to check

what happen , if it fail ??

if it is ok, will the report be combined by game developer to let me c ...more clearly inside that castle ??

[1395275] xJadetsssx [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:42 a.m.

Conqueror9 wrote: »

It seems I get some unknown from espionage

can i re-send to check

what happen , if it fail ??

if it is ok, will the report be combined by game developer to let me c ...more clearly inside that castle ??

Yes you can re-send the espionage, if you fail, the other opponent will know, and no the reports don't combine, but you can compare between them

[1395276] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:44 a.m.

you get ? (aka, unknowns) because you didn't set 100% accuracy. Send more spies (if possible)

if you send another one at the same accuracy as the last one and it is succesful, you might get the missing pieces and what was accurate in the last one, might show up as ?... then you just need to do some guess work...

if they get caught, the 'enemy' will get a mail notifying him of the failed attempt as well as the name whose spies belong to.

[1395278] xJadetsssx [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:46 a.m.

k3rb3r05 wrote: »

you get ? (aka, unknowns) because you didn't set 100% accuracy. Send more spies (if possible)

if you send another one at the same accuracy as the last one and it is succesful, you might get the missing pieces and what was accurate in the last one, might show up as ?... if they get caught, the 'enemy' will get a mail notifying him of the failed attempt as well as the name whose spies belong to.

Sending more spies doesn't increase the accuraccy of the report you can send 1 spy at 100% or 15 also with 100% of accuraccy and get the same report , sending more spies only decrease the risk, to get a full report you have to set a 100% of accuraccy, but that will be more risky, unless you send more spies of course^...^

[1395283] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:54 a.m.

But he is worried about getting caught, so i took it as 'if i increase accuracy, i increase risk, at current spy count'

[1395284] xJadetsssx [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 9:56 a.m.

k3rb3r05 wrote: »

But he is worried about getting caught, so i took it as 'if i increase accuracy, i increase risk, at current spy count'

But he also want to remove the "unknowns" and if you send another Inaccurate report, you could get other numbers from the other ones you have for example, o_O

[1395287] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 10:03 a.m.

xJadetsssx wrote: »

But he also want to remove the "unknowns" and if you send another Inaccurate report, you could get other numbers from the other ones you have for example, o_O

You are right. Instead of saying "... you didn't set 100% accuracy. Send more spies (if possible) ", I should have said "... you didn't set 100% accuracy. Send more spies (if possible) at 100% accuracy".

I wasn't specific. But thought it was implied from the context

[1395301] Conqueror9 [None] :: Sept. 28, 2012, 11:04 a.m.

Thanks

i just re-espionage with 100% accuracy

now.. i know ...what they are...

thanks a lot

[1395321] Unknown :: Sept. 28, 2012, 1 p.m.