Forum: empire-en
Board: [584] Players ask Players
Topic: [78022] alliance members list
[-78022]
awesome charley [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 6:51 p.m.
on the alliance members list, why do people move up and down in order?
just interested
just interested
[1398454]
M.Arsalan Ali [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:07 p.m.
I also want to know 
[1398463]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:16 p.m.
Same here 
[1398464]
Sparkster [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:17 p.m.
I have no idea. I've tried to find some sort of pattern to the order, but there just doesn't seem to be one. It's not alphabetical or by level, and it doesn't seem to be related to activity. I'm pretty sure it's just random.
[1398469]
samfighter (GB1) [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:25 p.m.
I also want to know as people think they are stronger then other people if they are above of somone
[1398480]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:36 p.m.
Maybe how much they donated, works for most causes, but there is an odd one out in every alliance Ive been in.
Actually, like 5 odd ones out, lol
Actually, like 5 odd ones out, lol
[1398483]
Awesome35008 [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 7:38 p.m.
You are ALL wrong its by member at the lowest, sergeant second to last, general above sergeant and leader at the top
[1398529]
DFlynn [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 9:23 p.m.
no i'm pretty sure they are not wrong :P everyone knows it goes in that order but this thread is about the order of the members, sergeants and generals. Like if you have 3 sergeants, the order changes every few days. i dont know either???
[1398531]
Sparkster [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 9:37 p.m.
DFlynn is correct, we are talking about the order within the categories of generals/sergeants/regular members. Sometimes I'm at the top of the list of generals, sometimes I'm at the bottom, and there doesn't seem to be any rhyme or reason to it.
[1398545]
matt44402 [None]
:: Oct. 6, 2012, 10:32 p.m.
i want to no to
[1435811]
Normy668 [None]
:: Dec. 5, 2012, 9:51 a.m.
Bump, I want to know aswell, looks random, it doesn't seem to matter if you're earning glory or high in honour or when you joined.
[1455735]
nicknamearya [None]
:: Jan. 2, 2013, 10:13 p.m.
why would you want to know, there is no real point to being higher up
[1455779]
marco37 [None]
:: Jan. 2, 2013, 11:42 p.m.
i agreed, there is no point of beeing higher then the same general / seargant. But i see it to, don't understand why, but the order change everyday.
[1455780]
BlackDrgn [None]
:: Jan. 2, 2013, 11:45 p.m.
I believe it only changes if someone leaves or joins the alliance.
[1455923]
EPICJ0SH [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 3:46 a.m.
the placement or order of names within the alliance list depends on a combination of factors including donations and honor
being near the top of the alliance list also gives you more notice at a glance, which may result in attacking or messaging of you
being near the top of the alliance list also gives you more notice at a glance, which may result in attacking or messaging of you
[1455956]
ameen122 [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 4:41 a.m.
well i think it may be because the time of joining < who joined first would be up
[1455963]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 4:56 a.m.
well i think it may be because the time of joining < who joined first would be up
No. My longest member is at the bottom of the generals list.
[1456082]
awesome charley [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 12:38 p.m.
it could possible be based on activity and donations combined. the glory thing doesnt work as at the musketeers one of our top generals only has 1,012 honour
[1456143]
jntmhu [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 2:20 p.m.
6 letters:random
[1456220]
Wisefire [None]
:: Jan. 3, 2013, 4:19 p.m.
Its surely based on activity