Goodgame Studios forum archives

Forum: empire-en
Board: [584] Players ask Players
Topic: [78118] Alliances

[-78118] gloryseeker2 [None] :: Oct. 8, 2012, 6:39 p.m.
When you make a pact with a alliance surely you should be able to send them support if you are together the thing is though is that the only think you can do is not attack it when you are at a non aggression agreement that means that if you click on the alliance you can attack it the thing is though is that now in the game you can so that counts for nothing anyone could attack you when you are at a non aggression agreement.

Please Post if you agree or disagree
but still if you have a non aggression agreement you shouldn't be able to attack it

[1399291] MartinUser1 [None] :: Oct. 8, 2012, 7:15 p.m.
i agree totally

[1399298] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Oct. 8, 2012, 7:23 p.m.
This should have been in suggestions

If you could send support to pacts, then what would be the difference from alliance members?

as far as nap (n-a.a.) goes, it could stay like it is, but if someone attacks a nap player, it should automatically declare war. it would make ppl more watchful of who they are attacking.

[1399317] pinup2 [None] :: Oct. 8, 2012, 7:55 p.m.
i can't even send support to my own alliance in the snow it would take 14hrs... :(

[1399321] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Oct. 8, 2012, 8:26 p.m.
pinup2 wrote: »
i can't even send support to my own alliance in the snow it would take 14hrs... :(
not if you have lvl 3 stables and send at max speed

[1400402] BobFighter834 (INT2) [None] :: Oct. 10, 2012, 6:15 p.m.
k3rb3r05 wrote: »
not if you have lvl 3 stables and send at max speed

Or if you have 290% support speed.

[1400403] HeroDonaldi [None] :: Oct. 10, 2012, 6:16 p.m.
Yes i agree to !

[1400404] xCLOWDx [None] :: Oct. 10, 2012, 6:20 p.m.
Thats an awesome idea!!!