Goodgame Studios forum archives ::

Topic: [78150] Has the game change attack and defense logic ??

[-78150] Conqueror9 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 8:47 a.m.

when I attack rbc level 10

i usually can mount 13 soldier on left or right flank

now, i can mount 10 soldier only

i check with rbc level 13

in past, i can mount 17 soldier on left or right flank

now i can only mount 14 soldier only

It seems to me

all the attack soldier in left, right or fronter

our attacking soldier are reduced by 3

But i do not see the annoucment of that adjustment in Game forum ??

Is that a bug or some news that i do not read b4 ??

P.S i just check player
b4 "update" i can send 29 soldier in left flank,
after "update", i can only send 26 soldier in left flank

[ same player ]

[1399499] xJadetsssx [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 8:50 a.m.

That depends of the level of the defender, you can send less soldiers to the RBC level 10 because it have lower level than the level 13 one

[1399506] Conqueror9 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 9:06 a.m.

xJadetsssx wrote: »

That depends of the level of the defender, you can send less soldiers to the RBC level 10 because it have lower level than the level 13 one

?? i am lost ??

my question is

before they log all of us out to do "update"

i can send 13 soldier in left flank of a level 10 RBC

after "update"

i can only send 10 soldier in left flank of a level 10 RBC

< i know that, becos i am moving soldier to hit that RBC >

I mention level 10 and 13 RBC together, it is for comarsion b4 and afet "update", it just try to say..there is a general deduction of amount of soldier we can send to hit RBC [ all reduce by 3 ]

may be my english is too bad...to express myself..
sorry for that

[1399507] xJadetsssx [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 9:10 a.m.

It is not your fault nothing to worry about, in fact the amount of soldiers you can send in the flanks is the level of the target

Level 20 | 20 soldiers in the flank(s)
and the level (x3) is the soldiers you can sent in the middle.

[1399509] Conqueror9 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 9:16 a.m.

xJadetsssx wrote: »

It is not your fault nothing to worry about, in fact the amount of soldiers you can send in the flanks is the level of the target

Level 20 | 20 soldiers in the flank(s)
and the level (x3) is the soldiers you can sent in the middle.

OMG
it means
b4 today "update", level 10 , i can send 13 soldiers..... it is a bug

it is "corrected" after today "update"

[1399510] M.Arsalan Ali [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 9:18 a.m.

I also noticed it and it was not included in the update, I don't like it.

[1399566] Conqueror9 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 12:13 p.m.

other post say it is annouced b4....

never notice that ??

[1399577] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 12:30 p.m.

Conqueror9 wrote: »

other post say it is annouced b4....

never notice that ??

no, it wasn't announced. no, it wasn't a bug that needed fixing. (there are gazilion bugs that need fixing but they go and mess around with the npc)

[1399579] BlackDrgn [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 12:33 p.m.

It was part of the update for balancing, although it was never announced.

[1399608] Impetuous Minx [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 2:02 p.m.

I had three bugs between last night and today, this one we are talking about with 3 less attackers for each flank, 30 missing traveling crossbowmen that were attacking low level robber barons last night that never came home, and this morning I watched a robber baron attacking a member in my alliance... that was offline.

I did not see anything in the updates saying the drop of 3 to attacks, are we sure it is not a bug?

If not a bug, why change this instead of working on all the missing troop problems?

[1399610] Unknown :: Oct. 9, 2012, 2:08 p.m.

Hi guys,

This is not a bug, it is an intended change.

Malreyn

[1399612] k3rb3r05 [None] :: Oct. 9, 2012, 2:10 p.m.

Impetuous Minx wrote: »

I had three bugs between last night and today, this one we are talking about with 3 less attackers for each flank, 30 missing traveling crossbowmen that were attacking low level robber barons last night that never came home, and this morning I watched a robber baron attacking a member in my alliance... that was offline.

I did not see anything in the updates saying the drop of 3 to attacks, are we sure it is not a bug?

If not a bug, why change this instead of working on all the missing troop problems?

about the rbc attack, maybe when it was launched, your alliance member was online and logged off without noticing?

the reduced attackers aren't a bug, CM weren't aware.

[1400502] BobFighter834 (INT2) [None] :: Oct. 10, 2012, 8:15 p.m.

CM Malreyn wrote: »

Hi guys,

This is not a bug, it is an intended change.

Malreyn

Then why were we not informed? This is going to make a dramatic change to some of us. I could have tried to attack the fortresses before the update to gain more rubies, and tactics are going to change with attacking the NPCs. The 150 level up limit was bad enough, but now we can't even reach that limit without losing more soldiers than before.

GGS, get a grip.

[1400515] xJadetsssx [None] :: Oct. 10, 2012, 8:25 p.m.

Also, that ruins the "RBC guides" players are doing

[1400921] Conqueror9 [None] :: Oct. 11, 2012, 3:29 a.m.

yep..

that "RBC guides" is no longer working

how can i send a 8 macemen in left and right Flank of a level 5 RBC !! < may be send 8 2-twohand >

[1402176] BobFighter834 (INT2) [None] :: Oct. 13, 2012, 10:10 a.m.

Conqueror9 wrote: »

yep..

that "RBC guides" is no longer working

how can i send a 8 macemen in left and right Flank of a level 5 RBC !! < may be send 8 2-twohand >

It works perfectly, you just have to substitute things like that to as many as possible in one wave, and then the rest in another. So send 5 mace left + right and then 3 in another wave. Or in this case, use 2-handed swords or veterans or travelling knights or any type of renegade so you don't have as many losses.