Forum: empire-en
Board: [585] Technical Assistance
Topic: [76719] This combat report, makes no sense. Support please.
[-76719]
Sam4 (GB1) [None]
:: Sept. 6, 2012, 8:19 p.m.
Attachment not found.Attachment not found.Attachment not found.
Pretty sure this is a glitch/bug or whatever you want to call it. Forgive me if it's not.
My alliance member, the defender, was attacked as you can see in the pictures. However as you can see on the flanks NEITHER the attacker of defender won? The defender wiped out ALL but 1 of the attacking troops for some random reason - while the defender had more than half remaining. Consequently neither team won, but the attacker achieved a 30% attack bonus in the keep, therefore killing off more defending troops than they should have.
Can someone check this out?
Pretty sure this is a glitch/bug or whatever you want to call it. Forgive me if it's not.
My alliance member, the defender, was attacked as you can see in the pictures. However as you can see on the flanks NEITHER the attacker of defender won? The defender wiped out ALL but 1 of the attacking troops for some random reason - while the defender had more than half remaining. Consequently neither team won, but the attacker achieved a 30% attack bonus in the keep, therefore killing off more defending troops than they should have.
Can someone check this out?
[1386785]
xJadetsssx [None]
:: Sept. 6, 2012, 8:48 p.m.
Well you are seeing the Overview, but I think is a display bug, because if for example, you had the same set-up in both flanks like the 3rd screenshot you will have over 290 soldiers in the wall, so I think is a display bug
I think that happened to me once some time ago
I think that happened to me once some time ago
[1386787]
Sam4 (GB1) [None]
:: Sept. 6, 2012, 8:50 p.m.
xJadetsssx wrote: »Well you are seeing the Overview, but I think is a display bug, because if for example, you had the same set-up in both flanks like the 3rd screenshot you will have over 290 soldiers in the wall, so I think is a display bug
I think that happened to me once some time ago
Cheers that must be it
So I'm guessing you're correct - thanks again