Goodgame Studios forum archives

Forum: empire-en
Board: [587] Alliance introductions & searches
Topic: [103542] Rebellion

[-103542] SageKey2 [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 2:06 a.m.
Let there be light!
Okay so all those alliances that don't have ruby buyers and have around 4 people are sad I'm just gonna state that but who says we can't move on? Why can't the smaller weaker alliances team up and overthrow the big alliances like Hive and MISC? With a series of coordinated attacks between alliances on strategic points in the realm could let the smaller alliances and people conquer the large. Obviously we would have to after we set there whole castles and outposts ablaze blackmail them threatening that if they don't destroy all their buildings and kill their troops and then the people could rise and flourish! (Of course we would have to bribe a few highish level players to help us) Anyway I would like your input on this plan of mine, try to send me ideas so I can change it for the better so we can get the best results!

[1714538] Urúvion (US1) [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 2:17 a.m.
How are you going to 'bribe' higher level players?

[1714550] SageKey [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 3:48 a.m.
Use the market to send them resources in return for possible service.

[1714553] SageKey [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 3:54 a.m.
k9euQ.gif

[1714554] SageKey [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 3:55 a.m.
Oh and SageKey and SageKey2 are both me

[1714555] SageKey [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 3:55 a.m.
Please click on my egg
k9euQ.gif

[1714676] Urúvion (US1) [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 12:09 p.m.
SageKey wrote: »
Use the market to send them resources in return for possible service.

I highly doubt you will be able to bribe anyone with resources.

Oh, and multi accounting is against the rules. ;)

[1714682] king matt III [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 12:54 p.m.
Large groups of misscellanous alliances, like Officers United are in the best position to do so, if they are even still around. This is idea was easier when alliances were the alliances, but with all the sub-alliances and training-alliances its more complicated situation.
in short great idea!! but its not the most practical.

[1714691] Urúvion (US1) [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 1:06 p.m.
The little alliances could, in my opp onion, band together and overthrow the 'big' alliances. The only thing that is keeping them from doing so is fear, there all afraid of getting 'burnt' and having there castles waisted. Fear is the weapon that holds all the smaller alliances in place, and while the larger alliances wield this weapon, nobody will ever dare do anything.

[1714698] king matt III [None] :: Feb. 27, 2014, 1:24 p.m.
aidan952 wrote: »
The little alliances could, in my opp onion, band together and overthrow the 'big' alliances. The only thing that is keeping them from doing so is fear, there all afraid of getting 'burnt' and having there castles waisted. Fear is the weapon that holds all the smaller alliances in place, and while the larger alliances wield this weapon, nobody will ever dare do anything.

i would like to say: "agreed"

[1716196] Despotic (US1) (Banned) [US1] :: March 2, 2014, 8:57 a.m.
so what would you do when you "overthrew' these alliances? who would you fight? would you fight all the guys that helped you to victory, or would you go after other guys who would by definition then be the underdogs? I get it, it gets boring seeing another 5 man alliance claim they belong to the big guys and that an attack on them is an attack against their mommy alliance. I do understand. My question is what do you do when you win this thing?
the big guys all started where you did, at the bottom. Some of them did fight massive wars against each other and earned each others respect.
I don't see them all losing at once unless it is announced that gge is shutting down and there is nothing to lose...but hell they may win that free-for-all too....

Disclaimer: I am not in the big leagues

[1716242] Urúvion (US1) [None] :: March 2, 2014, 10:35 a.m.
And if you DO succeed in 'overthrowing' the big alliances, what's going to happen then? You are just going to become what you originally tried to fight.

[1716244] mayankrule [None] :: March 2, 2014, 11:10 a.m.
Large groups of misscellanous alliances, like Officers United are in the best position to do so, if they are even still around. This is idea was easier when alliances were the alliances, but with all the sub-alliances and training-alliances its more complicated situation.
in short great idea!! but its not the most practical.
It would take more than a few 100 alliances to overthrow those big guys, My approximation would be that to burn one player of the big alliances you need to have atleast 5000 attackers with ruby tools and a 90/90 commander :)
So nope, there is no hope for this 'Rebellion'

[1716251] Ken11 (US1) [None] :: March 2, 2014, 1:15 p.m.
SageKey wrote: »
Oh and SageKey and SageKey2 are both me


poor sap... say goodbye.. multiple accounts are prohibited