Goodgame Studios forum archives
Forum: empire-en
Board: [587] Alliance introductions & searches
Topic: [119910] Recruiting Thread for Fleur de Sel
[2007827] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:07 p.m.
jeethBOSS2 wrote: »
the fact those things happened to you were probabley what happened when you had too much troops, produced TOO much banners, and wasted resources on stuff. trust me, it jhappens to all of us. but the only thig you can do is get outta the economic depression and keep going on

I don't make banners any more, and I only have 500k. :(
samasensei3 wrote: »
No it doesnt, a maybe if 5 people did 5 attacks on castles with around 500 defenders, in the 7 days you could get 750k coins and 75k rubies and dont say 5 attacks in 7 days is hard, you shouldnt be losing much against foreigners unless you are hitting castles with 1k and over.

Fair enough maybe not top 50 but top 200 is definitely reachable

On USA1 there are active alliances, and it's harder to get the the top competing with all of those alliances.

I don't own my own alliance on EN1, so I wouldn't know if it's that easy on your server...
[2007831] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:09 p.m.
Stop making excuses, there is way over 200 active alliances on en1. Our wing alliance has lower level players and they still got top 200.
[2007844] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:21 p.m.
jollyjack82 wrote: »
Stop making excuses, there is way over 200 active alliances on en1. Our wing alliance has lower level players and they still got top 200.

I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining it. If you want, I'll burn that wing alliance for you.
[2007848] Unknown :: July 7, 2015, 4:23 p.m.
Graycat3 wrote: »
I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining it. If you want, I'll burn that wing alliance for you.




burned wings......sounds deliscous :p
[2007851] Raymondmay11 (US1) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:25 p.m.
jeethBOSS2 wrote: »
burned wings......sounds deliscous :p

bbqburned-1.jpg
[2007854] samasensei3 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:27 p.m.
Graycat3 wrote: »
I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining it. If you want, I'll burn that wing alliance for you.


Yeah and i could burn you :D
[2007855] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:27 p.m.
jeethBOSS2 wrote: »
burned wings......sounds deliscous :p

yeah, I'm in a good sized alliance. if it's true there are 5 members in that alliance it'll be fun. :D
[2007858] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:28 p.m.
Graycat3 wrote: »
I'm not making excuses, I'm explaining it. If you want, I'll burn that wing alliance for you.


You're not strong enough lol
[2007861] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:29 p.m.
samasensei3 wrote: »
Yeah and i could burn you :D

It's allies unite that's our wing

they can handle graycat no problem :p
[2007864] samasensei3 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:31 p.m.
I still got the invite from there in my archive lol
[2007865] samasensei3 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:31 p.m.
Graycat3 wrote: »
yeah, I'm in a good sized alliance. if it's true there are 5 members in that alliance it'll be fun. :D

If u in a good sized alliance then you could get top 200 in wotr easily, if you cant then........
[2007867] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:33 p.m.
good sized = 4 active members
[2007884] samasensei3 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:47 p.m.
jollyjack82 wrote: »
good sized = 4 active members


thats was the size of my alliance on asia 1 server when we came top 50 in war of the realms, i suppose it is much easier there
[2007895] Unknown :: July 7, 2015, 4:57 p.m.
i'd considered it like this:


Small alliance : 1-14 members
Good-sized(or meduim): 15-39 members
Large alliance: 40-max limit members
[2007897] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:59 p.m.
jeethBOSS2 wrote: »
i'd considered it like this:


Small alliance : 1-14 members
Good-sized(or meduim): 15-39 members
Large alliance: 40-max limit members

Yep, good sized like that. :D
[2007898] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 4:59 p.m.
Nah:

small 0-20

medium 21-39

large 40+
[2007921] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 5:17 p.m.
jollyjack82 wrote: »
Nah:

small 0-20

medium 21-39

large 40+

Medium then if you have to call it that. Your point is?
[2007926] jollyjack82 [None] :: July 7, 2015, 5:20 p.m.
I was talking to jeeth
[2007928] NickDude (US1) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 5:22 p.m.
So whatever?We don't see your point
[2007929] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: July 7, 2015, 5:23 p.m.
jollyjack82 wrote: »
I was talking to jeeth

Poptart Cat was a lot more accurate than you were. And he was an alliance leader, so I'm pretty sure he'd be correct on it,