Forum: empire-en
Board: [587] Alliance introductions & searches
Topic: [350030] Crown Royals Is Currently Recruiting
[-350030]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 24, 2018, 5:02 a.m.
I’ll do my best to keep this short 
We are a fast growing, battle-tested alliance with a strong leadership core in search of PvP loving players, who can pull their weight in events. We are a part of the TU family, and working towards becoming a constant top 20 alliance in both rankings and events. The ride to top 20 won't be an easy one, Loyalty is key.
We are looking for active players who can maintain a minimum of above 250k MP and 4mil loot a week.
If you are able to meet the loot mins, but not the MP you may prove your worth by fighting me, 1v1.
Please feel free to contact me in game for any questions, or to apply. Thank you for your time 
[4932196]
OxO (AU1) [AU1]
:: March 25, 2018, 6:30 a.m.
lol active players and 4mil loot does not go together
[4932216]
Venom (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: March 25, 2018, 8:23 a.m.
Let the guy recruit in peaceOxO (AU1) said:lol active players and 4mil loot does not go together
[4932357]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 25, 2018, 2:12 p.m.
Yeah, it does. We are not an event orientated alliance, we are looking for PvP players who can also hold their own in events. Not event players who can hold their own in pvp...OxO (AU1) said:lol active players and 4mil loot does not go together
[4932452]
ChadFighter (US1) [None]
:: March 25, 2018, 6:27 p.m.
I personally have no love for CR.
I was a deputy at one of their former subs, and they dropped us out of no where. No warning just poof. When I tried to come back they told me I was banned. When I asked why they failed to come up with an answer.
Also not to mention their dirty tactics. They massed a smaller alliance, Nation Forces, because they were winning in storm and you guys were losing. Instead to trying to step up your game in storm you took the easier option which was to mass a smaller and independent alliance. So much for fair play.
And beating you in 1v1 isn't that much of a challenge. If you're tying to get players to prove their worth, come up with a harder challenge,
I was a deputy at one of their former subs, and they dropped us out of no where. No warning just poof. When I tried to come back they told me I was banned. When I asked why they failed to come up with an answer.
Also not to mention their dirty tactics. They massed a smaller alliance, Nation Forces, because they were winning in storm and you guys were losing. Instead to trying to step up your game in storm you took the easier option which was to mass a smaller and independent alliance. So much for fair play.
And beating you in 1v1 isn't that much of a challenge. If you're tying to get players to prove their worth, come up with a harder challenge,
[4932567]
Friedrich IV (US1) [None]
:: March 25, 2018, 11:18 p.m.
*eats popcorn*
this should get good
this should get good
[4932597]
Asterius (US1) (Banned) [None]
:: March 26, 2018, 12:43 a.m.
you shouldn't confess your "love" or true feelings here on forum...that's bold.ChadFighter (US1) said:I personally have no love for CR....
haven't you heard about love on the beach..err on the great empire.
[4932630]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 4:29 a.m.
lol chad you piece of shit, 1v1 me then. Thursday we start, I won't get any support and I expect the same from you. I am going to mop the floor with you.ChadFighter (US1) said:I personally have no love for CR.
I was a deputy at one of their former subs, and they dropped us out of no where. No warning just poof. When I tried to come back they told me I was banned. When I asked why they failed to come up with an answer.
Also not to mention their dirty tactics. They massed a smaller alliance, Nation Forces, because they were winning in storm and you guys were losing. Instead to trying to step up your game in storm you took the easier option which was to mass a smaller and independent alliance. So much for fair play.
And beating you in 1v1 isn't that much of a challenge. If you're tying to get players to prove their worth, come up with a harder challenge,
[4932646]
OxO (AU1) [AU1]
:: March 26, 2018, 5:53 a.m.
PvP players doesnt just mean attack people for loot lolDoomWalker (US1) said:Yeah, it does. We are not an event orientated alliance, we are looking for PvP players who can also hold their own in events. Not event players who can hold their own in pvp...OxO (AU1) said:lol active players and 4mil loot does not go together
[4932649]
Katukov (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 6:07 a.m.
Strong recruitment representation.DoomWalker (US1) said:lol chad you piece of shit, 1v1 me then. Thursday we start, I won't get any support and I expect the same from you. I am going to mop the floor with you.ChadFighter (US1) said:I personally have no love for CR.
I was a deputy at one of their former subs, and they dropped us out of no where. No warning just poof. When I tried to come back they told me I was banned. When I asked why they failed to come up with an answer.
Also not to mention their dirty tactics. They massed a smaller alliance, Nation Forces, because they were winning in storm and you guys were losing. Instead to trying to step up your game in storm you took the easier option which was to mass a smaller and independent alliance. So much for fair play.
And beating you in 1v1 isn't that much of a challenge. If you're tying to get players to prove their worth, come up with a harder challenge,

[4932666]
TannerM. (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 7:53 a.m.

I suck and this wasn't very hard to do even for me. I see why you'd challenge a level 59 to a 1v1.
Putting my money on Chad.
[4932822]
JYT (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 11:11 a.m.
Fair play? boi its a war gameChadFighter (US1) said:I personally have no love for CR.
I was a deputy at one of their former subs, and they dropped us out of no where. No warning just poof. When I tried to come back they told me I was banned. When I asked why they failed to come up with an answer.
Also not to mention their dirty tactics. They massed a smaller alliance, Nation Forces, because they were winning in storm and you guys were losing. Instead to trying to step up your game in storm you took the easier option which was to mass a smaller and independent alliance. So much for fair play.
And beating you in 1v1 isn't that much of a challenge. If you're tying to get players to prove their worth, come up with a harder challenge,
geez why do people keep forgetting that? Maybe because GGS is trying to kill off PvP...
[4932912]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 1:18 p.m.
Maybe this is why it was not very hard http://prntscr.com/iwjp94TannerM. (US1) said:
I suck and this wasn't very hard to do even for me. I see why you'd challenge a level 59 to a 1v1.
Putting my money on Chad.
hmh, very fair. You are only 239 LL's higher than me.
You only won a single battle. I'm not afraid of fires we can fight this out if you'd like.
[4932921]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 1:29 p.m.
I remind you that it was him who challenged me http://prntscr.com/iwjw69 and on top of that I could have said we start today or tomorrow. Instead, I am giving him until Thursday to prepare.TannerM. (US1) said:
I suck and this wasn't very hard to do even for me. I see why you'd challenge a level 59 to a 1v1.
Putting my money on Chad.
[4932926]
Friedrich IV (US1) [None]
:: March 26, 2018, 1:32 p.m.
really...............................................DoomWalker (US1) said:
hmh, very fair. You are only 239 LL's higher than me.
[4932942]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 1:47 p.m.
Oh, I see what he was saying now, lol Sorry I just got back from a long shift and am a little braindead. If you would like to though Tanner I would gladly 1v1 you instead? Chadfighter cannot really satisfy my battle hungry appetite for longBM_Friedrich said:really...............................................DoomWalker (US1) said:
hmh, very fair. You are only 239 LL's higher than me.
[4932982]
DoomWalker (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 2:29 p.m.
@BM_Friedrich
This was supposed to be a recruitment thread... I think its best if you would just close this forum. It's sad to see her go, but it's for the best
Btw, Tanner, I am serious about the 1v1, if you want to agree to it I will give it my all. Don't worry I will put up a fight
This was supposed to be a recruitment thread... I think its best if you would just close this forum. It's sad to see her go, but it's for the best
Btw, Tanner, I am serious about the 1v1, if you want to agree to it I will give it my all. Don't worry I will put up a fight
[4933015]
sandy wells (US1) (Banned) [None]
:: March 26, 2018, 3:04 p.m.
Good luck with your recruitment. You'll need all the luck you can get.
[4933168]
mnsc (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 6:42 p.m.
Lol doesn't matter if tanner's so many levels higher, if you use 4 flaming arrows as your afk defense setup (or even worse, that was your bright idea to hold the flank) then you clearly aren't cut out for pvp....DoomWalker (US1) said:Maybe this is why it was not very hard http://prntscr.com/iwjp94TannerM. (US1) said:
I suck and this wasn't very hard to do even for me. I see why you'd challenge a level 59 to a 1v1.
Putting my money on Chad.
hmh, very fair. You are only 239 LL's higher than me.
You only won a single battle. I'm not afraid of fires we can fight this out if you'd like.
[4933219]
hionmentho (US1) [US1]
:: March 26, 2018, 7:29 p.m.
I'd just like to point out that Tanner is garbage.