Goodgame Studios forum archives ::

Topic: [79571] JRH is not joining badboys!!!!

[-79571] fdgfgfg3 [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 12:39 a.m.

Text has been deleted

[1416347] GhjHero [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 1:12 a.m.

fdgfgfg3 wrote: »

recently i have seen a thread where Joel R H posted we are joining Badboys!!!
we are not joining Badboys!!!
i would rather join steel!!!

if you join Badboys i am leaving with Half of JRH!!!
Or even more!!!!
MAking Team Royal Family once again!!!!

Do you want steel to crush us?!!?
do you know how much work i've done?
i have done 60% of the Growing of JRH!
i founded the Divisons! JRH sigma, prime, omega, alpha and the reson was all slowly founded!!!
if you destroy it i am gonna get angry!! it took me awhile to do that! as a level 59 i can join Badboys anytime but i don't because they are snobs!!! i Like Steel 100% more! also JRH isn't even big it is small!!!

i want badboys dead!!! for any JRH's reading this we are not joining badboys!!!
~Battle Comander Fdgfgfg

1. He is your leader and his choices should be followed wether you like them or not. If Joel R H is reading this I suggest demoting/ throwing him out at once. Not doing so would make you look like a weak leader.
2. Just because JRH is small and shouldn't join the war dosent mean that they can't.
3. Why would you want to side with STEEL when it looks like Hells Boys is begginning to emerge as the clear winner!? While fighting STEEL may make you lose a lot of members if you fight HB you will lose your whole family. A good leader does not doom his whole family to extinction just because he considers the other side 'snobs'.

[1416381] Luke Fierysword [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 1:51 a.m.

Nor does a good leader take part in problem's that do not concern his alliance.

If he truly is the hero to the family that he says he is, throwing him out will hurt unity a lot and possibly even cause a civil war. In an alliance, all members should have a say, being an autocrat hardly ever makes your people love you.

[1416392] GhjHero [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 1:56 a.m.

Luke Fierysword wrote: »

Nor does a good leader take part in problem's that do not concern his alliance.

If he truly is the hero to the family that he says he is, throwing him out will hurt unity a lot and possibly even cause a civil war. In an alliance, all members should have a say, being an autocrat hardly ever makes your people love you.

But while he might be very powerful he still isn't leader and should have protested his leaders decision less angrily.

[1416441] Joel R H [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 2:29 a.m.

well put ghjHero i have demoted fdgfgfg from general to member but i have not thoughn him out becouse he is the highest level in my alliance so we kind of need him but if we wasn't i would have seriously considered it!

[1416443] Joel R H [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 2:34 a.m.

you know what all of you are right fdgfgfg dose have a right to protest againsed my disision and again your right he should have protested less angrily and i also have reconsidered my tought and i'm not going to enter the war simply becouse i saw some coments of the thread i posted and they made me think and i saw just how big my alliance was compered to STEEL or HB so i'm staying out of the war and i'm not going to trust fdgfgfg for quite a while now main reson why becouse of the threats he made

[1416499] DillonCail [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 4:01 a.m.

STEEL is a very powerful alliance Ghjhero, The reports I am receiving imply no clear winner and I am well-informed.

[1416506] GhjHero [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 4:11 a.m.

DillonCail wrote: »

STEEL is a very powerful alliance Ghjhero, The reports I am receiving imply no clear winner and I am well-informed.

I am not disagreeing but from what I've read and researched I've found a lot of information saying that STEEL is becoming weaker. Probably the biggest example I've found is that STEEL just lost a capital to KK. And when I searched for all the alliances on their website I could only find 23, nowhere close to the 50+ they showed on their website. These are the two main points of information I am basing my statements on. I am 100% open to new ideas and evidence that would show STEEL might have an edge.

[1416532] Unknown :: Nov. 7, 2012, 4:53 a.m.

GhjHero wrote: »

3. Why would you want to side with STEEL when it looks like Hells Boys is begginning to emerge as the clear winner!? While fighting STEEL may make you lose a lot of members if you fight HB you will lose your whole family. A good leader does not doom his whole family to extinction just because he considers the other side 'snobs'.

Is this propaganda? Because to me it does not look that way and im in the middle of it

I am not going to say anything to upset our former members but I think merging the stronger players and moving the weaker ones out is a positive thing.

I think it is wise to leave it at that.

[1416536] Unknown :: Nov. 7, 2012, 4:57 a.m.

GhjHero wrote: »

I am not disagreeing but from what I've read and researched I've found a lot of information saying that STEEL is becoming weaker. Probably the biggest example I've found is that STEEL just lost a capital to KK. And when I searched for all the alliances on their website I could only find 23, nowhere close to the 50+ they showed on their website. These are the two main points of information I am basing my statements on. I am 100% open to new ideas and evidence that would show STEEL might have an edge.

STEEL used to go for strength in numbers, this tactic does not work anymore. Nowadays its better to have 10 strong branches instead of 50 weak ones.

Capital moving to KK means nothing since they are friends and STEEL as a whole did not profit anyways from that capital as the teams holding it did not fight much. If the capital went to BB for example, I would have said "GhjHero you are absolutely right" but now.... no.

[1416934] GhjHero [None] :: Nov. 7, 2012, 10:09 p.m.

Oxydrene wrote: »

STEEL used to go for strength in numbers, this tactic does not work anymore. Nowadays its better to have 10 strong branches instead of 50 weak ones.

Capital moving to KK means nothing since they are friends and STEEL as a whole did not profit anyways from that capital as the teams holding it did not fight much. If the capital went to BB for example, I would have said "GhjHero you are absolutely right" but now.... no.

I was just stating my views and how I felt.

[1417339] marco37 [None] :: Nov. 8, 2012, 5:24 p.m.

Oxydrene wrote: »

STEEL used to go for strength in numbers, this tactic does not work anymore. Nowadays its better to have 10 strong branches instead of 50 weak ones.

Capital moving to KK means nothing since they are friends and STEEL as a whole did not profit anyways from that capital as the teams holding it did not fight much. If the capital went to BB for example, I would have said "GhjHero you are absolutely right" but now.... no.

Just a way how you look at it but ok, steel still got 2 capitals and round 40 alliance of those 40, round 20 are very weak or on fire / burning . So we can say Steel have got round 20 - 25 alliance. There where 65+ alliance of Steel. i think a great lose. Even if you are getting most of them in a few big alliances. Don't know where this will go, we will see.