Forum: empire-en
Board: [588] Alliance News & Diplomacy
Topic: [81720] War with Sparta Romans!
[1445079]
GhjHero [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 12:41 a.m.
DraftBeef7 wrote: »I'm at war too
How wonderfully unrelated. Please start your own thread if you must but dont comment here about it.
[1445080]
Luke Fierysword [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 12:43 a.m.
[1445084]
vaderader [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 12:47 a.m.
For all BigQd2's threats and other nonsense I still say that he must have a lot of courage to take on the top alliance in the game.
okay sorta of topic but i just had to say this top allaince not exact ONE OF the top alliances is like it cuz BB sparta and HW are all strong i dont want to start a off topic fight so im saying they are all strong
and bigQd2 hope this time you dont keep your gates open last time i read that you left gates open 24/7
[1445094]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 12:55 a.m.
Ironically I was just attacked by 1032 troops and won
Was that you mate?
I would love to see the battle report from this attack, because the spy report I got showed you couldn't handle an attack of 500, much less over 1000.
[1445095]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:01 a.m.
and bigQd2 hope this time you dont keep your gates open last time i read that you left gates open 24/7
Well opening gates is part of the game. However, I have no intention of doing that, unless sparta does like last time and launch everything they have in their combined network of alliances at my castles, preceded by 6 or 8 tool removal attacks on each castle. I calculated the cost of lost tools and damage and figured it was a lot cheaper to open gates than to lose all those tools and troops. I'm sure anyone in my situation would have done the same.
[1445096]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:03 a.m.
I would love to see the battle report from this attack, because the spy report I got showed you couldn't handle an attack of 500, much less over 1000.
Ikr

I lost more than 700 troops in that battle, so I had 800 before

I don't have the combat report now, but I can always get an alliance member to help me out

[1445097]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:04 a.m.
Luke Fierysword wrote: »
Ya, it is unfortunate that Lizz is so close to the guy that attacked her. She isn't very active and very inexperienced in battle. Hopefully this beating will help her improve her game.
[1445100]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:13 a.m.
So BigQD, what do you think. Do you accept my apologies? And I can show you the combat report if you give me more time....
[1445103]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:14 a.m.
I don't need to see the report. I have no problem with you and no apology is necessary, but if you continue to challenge me, I will respond accordingly.
[1445107]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:18 a.m.
I don't need to see the report. I have no problem with you and no apology is necessary, but if you continue to challenge me, I will respond accordingly.
Ok BigQd. I am not afraid, I just didn't appreciate the way you responded to king avalon 2. Perhaps some respect from all members on this thread is required

[1445113]
King Avalon 2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:26 a.m.
Dun Gon I appreciate you having my back but BigQd and I have been messaging each other and everything is okay. Now I must ask you to not have this war with bigqd. Again thank you Dun
i will be messaging you soon to fil you in


[1445114]
Luke Fierysword [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:26 a.m.
Ya, it is unfortunate that Lizz is so close to the guy that attacked her. She isn't very active and very inexperienced in battle. Hopefully this beating will help her improve her game.
Ah, I find it encouraging that you believe in your loyal members so much....
[1445116]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:28 a.m.
Luke Fierysword wrote: »Can you do both sides a favor bro?
That was my idea too. A TEMPORARY cease-fire until January 2nd, 2013. During this time, we can hold diplomatic discussions. If a solution is not reached, we will get right back to war.
I attempted this today and sent a message to Ace Hunter in game. I assumed by your attacks today and lack of response to my message that it was not an option. I expected the attack on me from Don Rico, since I stole his food village in ice to replace the one that was stolen from me, but didn't expect to see the ass whooping on lizz.
As I said in my message. I got back what I wanted to get back and we can end this war right now. I never wanted to go to war, but knowing how sparta rolls, I didn't see that we had much choice. I knew I wasn't going to be able to take back a village without an all out war. Now that I have replaced the village, we can continue with the war or stop, it's up to you guys. I got what I came for and didn't have to bully and steal from a little guy to get it. I just wanted to make things right.
[1445118]
Luke Fierysword [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:32 a.m.
I attempted this today and sent a message to Ace Hunter in game. I assumed by your attacks today and lack of response to my message that it was not an option. I expected the attack on me from Don Rico, since I stole his food village in ice to replace the one that was stolen from me, but didn't expect to see the ass whooping on lizz.
As I said in my message. I got back what I wanted to get back and we can end this war right now. I never wanted to go to war, but knowing how sparta rolls, I didn't see that we had much choice. I knew I wasn't going to be able to take back a village without an all out war. Now that I have replaced the village, we can continue with the war or stop, it's up to you guys. I got what I came for and didn't have to bully and steal from a little guy to get it. I just wanted to make things right.
Well if you put it that way, guess you can say that we too, might want to make things right.
Btw, the lack of response on that long message (that proposes no clear plan or terms) is due to the fact that we are discussing the response.
[1445121]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:34 a.m.
Luke Fierysword wrote: »Ah, I find it encouraging that you believe in your loyal members so much....
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger right?


[1445126]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 1:40 a.m.
Luke Fierysword wrote: »Well if you put it that way, guess you can say that we too, might want to make things right.
Btw, the lack of response on that long message (that proposes no clear plan or terms) is due to the fact that we are discussing the response.
Sounds good. We can do this formal part in game if you prefer. It doesn't matter to me, but I try to keep the formal stuff in game but the informal is fun to share with the public, that's why I sent the pm in game and not here. However, as far as plans or terms go, I thought we had terms before, after our last war, but I was shown otherwise, or played a fool. My only terms are show me and my alliance the respect that we show sparta and don't attack or steal from us.
We are however always open to a friendly scrimmage, where we can set some rules or guidelines to follow, then have a kick ass battle, without the risk of serious damage or annihilation to anyone. As I said in my message. This game can be quite boring when there are no battles, but it's hard to do battle because it is very dangerous with so many huge alliance networks that go around terrorizing everyone and making everyone afraid to attack anyone or even retaliate when being attacked. Most people in this game that aren't in huge alliances resemble dogs with their tails between their legs. If I have to be like that, I would see no reason to play this game anymore.
[1445154]
Dun Gon (INT2) [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 2:07 a.m.
Sounds good. We can do this formal part in game if you prefer. It doesn't matter to me, but I try to keep the formal stuff in game but the informal is fun to share with the public, that's why I sent the pm in game and not here. However, as far as plans or terms go, I thought we had terms before, after our last war, but I was shown otherwise, or played a fool. My only terms are show me and my alliance the respect that we show sparta and don't attack or steal from us.
We are however always open to a friendly scrimmage, where we can set some rules or guidelines to follow, then have a kick ass battle, without the risk of serious damage or annihilation to anyone. As I said in my message. This game can be quite boring when there are no battles, but it's hard to do battle because it is very dangerous with so many huge alliance networks around that go around terrorizing everyone and making everyone afraid to attack anyone. Most people in this game that aren't in huge alliances resemble dogs with their tails between their legs. If I have to be like that, I would see no reason to play this game anymore.
I agree with you. I struggle to survive OR have a friendly scrimmage in the games. But come back to the forum on the 28 of December and you will see our friendly scrimmage :P (a friendly scrimmage between 2 alliances)
[1445178]
vaderader [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 2:44 a.m.
Well opening gates is part of the game. However, I have no intention of doing that, unless sparta does like last time and launch everything they have in their combined network of alliances at my castles, preceded by 6 or 8 tool removal attacks on each castle. I calculated the cost of lost tools and damage and figured it was a lot cheaper to open gates than to lose all those tools and troops. I'm sure anyone in my situation would have done the same.
DUDE YOU HAVE AN ALLAINCE FOR A REASON if they can send support they are not good members oh yeah i forget they had there own castles to defend and failed at that too cuz your allaince is weak!
[1445187]
BigQd2 [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 2:54 a.m.
DUDE YOU HAVE AN ALLAINCE FOR A REASON if they can send support they are not good members oh yeah i forget they had there own castles to defend and failed at that too cuz your allaince is weak!
Them's fighten words punk! Was that your intention? Because that is how I am taking it.
[1445188]
vaderader [None]
:: Dec. 19, 2012, 2:59 a.m.
What doesn't kill you makes you stronger right?I try to tell people how serious the situation is and they better "D" up, and they dilly dally around. Sometimes a good whooping works better than encouraging talk.
that is only thing i agree on everything else you said i disagree your the leader if the dilly dally around then you are the leader responsible for making them listen so its your fault they dont listen that proves that your members are not loyal