Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

InsaneDuckling (GB1) said:

Not necessarily. Hornby has a point; you'll be more helpful to your alliance if you can support your comrades - same with them. I don't have fully decked out bakeries yet, but I've already started spending on stables. With all the events going on, looting is something that can keep you going for a while; a bakery is only a little boost to the amount of time you have left every night, so a stable is worth the purchase.

It also depends on how active you are, and as Hornby already stated, if you're in a fairly large alliance or not. If you can only get online sparingly, it'll be more difficult to loot so you can comtinue feeding your troops, so you'd focus on upgrading your bakery for lower food consumption.

A bakery is a big boost to how many troops a person can hold.

Still say stables is better in every way, can feed your troops faster, should be relying on loot, not food production/consumption

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

InsaneDuckling (GB1) said:

Not necessarily. Hornby has a point; you'll be more helpful to your alliance if you can support your comrades - same with them. I don't have fully decked out bakeries yet, but I've already started spending on stables. With all the events going on, looting is something that can keep you going for a while; a bakery is only a little boost to the amount of time you have left every night, so a stable is worth the purchase.

It also depends on how active you are, and as Hornby already stated, if you're in a fairly large alliance or not. If you can only get online sparingly, it'll be more difficult to loot so you can comtinue feeding your troops, so you'd focus on upgrading your bakery for lower food consumption.

A bakery is a big boost to how many troops a person can hold.

Still say stables is better in every way, can feed your troops faster, should be relying on loot, not food production/consumption

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

Or just have the troops anyway and feed them with loot...

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

InsaneDuckling (GB1) said:

Not necessarily. Hornby has a point; you'll be more helpful to your alliance if you can support your comrades - same with them. I don't have fully decked out bakeries yet, but I've already started spending on stables. With all the events going on, looting is something that can keep you going for a while; a bakery is only a little boost to the amount of time you have left every night, so a stable is worth the purchase.

It also depends on how active you are, and as Hornby already stated, if you're in a fairly large alliance or not. If you can only get online sparingly, it'll be more difficult to loot so you can comtinue feeding your troops, so you'd focus on upgrading your bakery for lower food consumption.

A bakery is a big boost to how many troops a person can hold.

Still say stables is better in every way, can feed your troops faster, should be relying on loot, not food production/consumption

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

Or just have the troops anyway and feed them with loot...

you're not a non-buyer, so you don't have the correct perspective.

besides, barracks help you feed them with loot.

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

InsaneDuckling (GB1) said:

Not necessarily. Hornby has a point; you'll be more helpful to your alliance if you can support your comrades - same with them. I don't have fully decked out bakeries yet, but I've already started spending on stables. With all the events going on, looting is something that can keep you going for a while; a bakery is only a little boost to the amount of time you have left every night, so a stable is worth the purchase.

It also depends on how active you are, and as Hornby already stated, if you're in a fairly large alliance or not. If you can only get online sparingly, it'll be more difficult to loot so you can comtinue feeding your troops, so you'd focus on upgrading your bakery for lower food consumption.

A bakery is a big boost to how many troops a person can hold.

Still say stables is better in every way, can feed your troops faster, should be relying on loot, not food production/consumption

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

Or just have the troops anyway and feed them with loot...

you're not a non-buyer, so you don't have the correct perspective.

besides, barracks help you feed them with loot.

I was a non buyer for a long time, and still remember it, loot is the answer, could afford most of the ruby buildings without buying, I say most, some of them, level 4 bakery, level 3 stables, level 3 WT

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

InsaneDuckling (GB1) said:

Not necessarily. Hornby has a point; you'll be more helpful to your alliance if you can support your comrades - same with them. I don't have fully decked out bakeries yet, but I've already started spending on stables. With all the events going on, looting is something that can keep you going for a while; a bakery is only a little boost to the amount of time you have left every night, so a stable is worth the purchase.

It also depends on how active you are, and as Hornby already stated, if you're in a fairly large alliance or not. If you can only get online sparingly, it'll be more difficult to loot so you can comtinue feeding your troops, so you'd focus on upgrading your bakery for lower food consumption.

A bakery is a big boost to how many troops a person can hold.

Still say stables is better in every way, can feed your troops faster, should be relying on loot, not food production/consumption

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

Or just have the troops anyway and feed them with loot...

you're not a non-buyer, so you don't have the correct perspective.

besides, barracks help you feed them with loot.

I was a non buyer for a long time, and still remember it, loot is the answer, could afford most of the ruby buildings without buying, I say most, some of them, level 4 bakery, level 3 stables, level 3 WT

Flare (GB1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

ang1243 (GB1) said:

Pallu (IN1) said:

except the difference in having each troops consuming 4/6 food and 2.4/3.6 food per hour is huge.

Or just have the troops anyway and feed them with loot...

you're not a non-buyer, so you don't have the correct perspective.

besides, barracks help you feed them with loot.

I was a non buyer for a long time, and still remember it, loot is the answer, could afford most of the ruby buildings without buying, I say most, some of them, level 4 bakery, level 3 stables, level 3 WT

Bakery should be a priority since in ice/sands/peaks all the towers will be close to you so a few seconds less travel time won't make much difference to your looting. In green I would expect non-buyers to have found outposts with stables at a high level already so there should be no need to upgrade those.

I will only upgrade my stables to level 2/3 once I have bakery lvl 6 and WT lvl 3 everywhere.

kojo123 (IN1) said:

I appreciate to spend rubies on stables and bakery if u have these then u wud be one of the top players

kojo123 (IN1) said:

If u have stables then u can hit fc much faster than others if u have bakery u can hit all four nomanf camps at a time this is what u need in evnts without these things u may win events at lower lvls but u can't sustain at higher lvls wich am dng now i neglected upgrading my bakery and now iam unable to keep enough sols and have to loot fud instead of resources to kep them alive and not upgrading stables resulted for me to attack fc it takes one hrs even after spending max rubies whereas others reach the fc on ten mins

ShadowOfEvil (GB1) said:

kojo123 (IN1) said:

If u have stables then u can hit fc much faster than others if u have bakery u can hit all four nomanf camps at a time this is what u need in evnts without these things u may win events at lower lvls but u can't sustain at higher lvls wich am dng now i neglected upgrading my bakery and now iam unable to keep enough sols and have to loot fud instead of resources to kep them alive and not upgrading stables resulted for me to attack fc it takes one hrs even after spending max rubies whereas others reach the fc on ten mins

Lv3 stables and max rubies still take 50mins for me to get there also FL isn't really a priority as far as event goes the horrors are nice and all but nomad/samurai are much more importent

tomtomtomwest (GB1) said:

 

Yeah...with a Glitchgame Empire nomads and nomads 2.0 are not better priorities. FC rewards are nice with Horrors, but I don't play as much to be able to get them (throw as many noob (or as I should say, n00b) jokes, but I'm not on this game taking care of a virtual empire 24/7!!) I prefer to smash the non- shiny wood outpost of an inactive ruby buyer. 

Wow.

What level are you? 30 or 60? Hard to tell...

tomtomtomwest (GB1) said:

ShadowOfEvil (GB1) said:

kojo123 (IN1) said:

If u have stables then u can hit fc much faster than others if u have bakery u can hit all four nomanf camps at a time this is what u need in evnts without these things u may win events at lower lvls but u can't sustain at higher lvls wich am dng now i neglected upgrading my bakery and now iam unable to keep enough sols and have to loot fud instead of resources to kep them alive and not upgrading stables resulted for me to attack fc it takes one hrs even after spending max rubies whereas others reach the fc on ten mins

Lv3 stables and max rubies still take 50mins for me to get there also FL isn't really a priority as far as event goes the horrors are nice and all but nomad/samurai are much more importent

Yeah...with a Glitchgame Empire nomads and nomads 2.0 are not better priorities. FC rewards are nice with Horrors, but I don't play as much to be able to get them (throw as many noob (or as I should say, n00b) jokes, but I'm not on this game taking care of a virtual empire 24/7!!) I prefer to smash the non- shiny wood outpost of an inactive ruby buyer. 

Ehmmm... Nomad/samurai are better priorities as you can get good deco, good cast and good comms from them

And four hits in five days without buying rubies was enough to get me in top 50 so I don't play 24/7 either

ShadowOfEvil (GB1) said:

tomtomtomwest (GB1) said:

ShadowOfEvil (GB1) said:

kojo123 (IN1) said:

If u have stables then u can hit fc much faster than others if u have bakery u can hit all four nomanf camps at a time this is what u need in evnts without these things u may win events at lower lvls but u can't sustain at higher lvls wich am dng now i neglected upgrading my bakery and now iam unable to keep enough sols and have to loot fud instead of resources to kep them alive and not upgrading stables resulted for me to attack fc it takes one hrs even after spending max rubies whereas others reach the fc on ten mins

Lv3 stables and max rubies still take 50mins for me to get there also FL isn't really a priority as far as event goes the horrors are nice and all but nomad/samurai are much more importent

Yeah...with a Glitchgame Empire nomads and nomads 2.0 are not better priorities. FC rewards are nice with Horrors, but I don't play as much to be able to get them (throw as many noob (or as I should say, n00b) jokes, but I'm not on this game taking care of a virtual empire 24/7!!) I prefer to smash the non- shiny wood outpost of an inactive ruby buyer. 

Ehmmm... Nomad/samurai are better priorities as you can get good deco, good cast and good comms from them

And four hits in five days without buying rubies was enough to get me in top 50 so I don't play 24/7 either