Forum: empire-en
Board: [590] Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
[-379655]
YourBloodyBase (US1) [US1]
:: Jan. 22, 2021, 7:15 a.m.
1. Multiple accounts @gazz65 (GB1) is right it's a huge problem The only benefit I really see is birding troops. But, povoing a level 13 and outpost capping is an epidemic on GB1 something needs to be done. For the benefit of that server. But, I still want the ability to send attackers under the bird while away from the game. My Alliance has spenders who bird currently but most alliances don't.
2. The random Fire burning and lagging glitch during train running on the Kahn tower during the nomads. Nothing like derailing your train or missing putting out an extra attack.
3. Train derailments during Kahn tower resets nothing like missing out on a train of attack because the tower leved.
4. A forward and backward arrow beside your command during attack setups. Would be nice to be able to adjust a missed selection. Or move quickly to the 35 commanders by pressing back. The back should be VIP commander then 35... etc. Same for Castilians in defensive setups.
5. The -1 one food glitch for Alliance donations. Needs to go. It's time.
6. Lag... During Alliance wars. Makes the game almost unpayable.
7. Pop-ups. It should be just like auto equipment selling we we receive an award nothing like getting interrupted all the time while running a train or trying to set up a defense. Fix it GGS, please.
8. The auto sell and if fixed correct reward/ pop up and click should be made smaller and in the top right corner nothing like lag during defense and offensive setups being covered when the time actually matters.
9. An upgrade to capitals/ metros troops food bonuses. Needs an adjustment to surprise us would be awesome. Mead Brewer would be a cool addition or something like labs even for it.
10. Free to play event rewards for f2p players. Would have to keep track of free to play gold sliver time skips banners and tools. Could be done. Though.
11. Clicking the offensive and defense tab and then autofill. Will allow you to send the allotted troop type. In spite of the problem seen with multi's, I believe sending your troops to protection is a major advantage to the game.
12. Being able to ship to any specified castle or outpost metros capitals included in the kingdom from the other kingdoms.
13. An easier way to move whole commanders. You could do this by making it so if you clicked on a commander on the top of the equipment window it just moved everything down the line and if you clicked and held it you could drop the whole set at on time in the area for equipment and remove the whole set. Even a couple of arrows under the commander selected to move it down or would be good naturally you'd want this to work with Castilians also.
14. Being able to transfer Aqua to players in Storm Island via the market barrows.
15. A builds all the same and heal all the same for barracks and hospitals. That we can heal of build all the same type of troop quickly
Would work also with tools.
16. Storm Forts Aqua storage increase or pay as you go option for Aqua for the new items in the vendor.
Feel Free to add to the list if ya'll think of anything as far as I got today. Got loot for food and get some rest.
14. Being able to transfer Aqua to players in Storm Island via the market barrows.
15. A builds all the same and heal all the same for barracks and hospitals. That we can heal of build all the same type of troop quickly
Would work also with tools.
16. Storm Forts Aqua storage increase or pay as you go option for Aqua for the new items in the vendor.
Feel Free to add to the list if ya'll think of anything as far as I got today. Got loot for food and get some rest.
[5174210]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 24, 2021, 12:42 p.m.
It's not all bad on uk server.
one way of making it better is to stop the abuse of players especially female players.
would ggs put adverts on tv telling people to come play a game and get abused and have
there game ruined no they would not so why let it happen.
agree with most of your above suggestions .
we all want the best for the game just need ggs to listen a bit more to players.
why not have a button on player messages when a player sends a disgusting message
to another player . we can press that button and that player gets a 7 day ban from the game.
but there castle doesn't go in to dove so we can hit them . only way you can press it is if they
they send abusive messages. saves players sending ticket to ggs and nothing happens.
one way of making it better is to stop the abuse of players especially female players.
would ggs put adverts on tv telling people to come play a game and get abused and have
there game ruined no they would not so why let it happen.
agree with most of your above suggestions .
we all want the best for the game just need ggs to listen a bit more to players.
why not have a button on player messages when a player sends a disgusting message
to another player . we can press that button and that player gets a 7 day ban from the game.
but there castle doesn't go in to dove so we can hit them . only way you can press it is if they
they send abusive messages. saves players sending ticket to ggs and nothing happens.
[5174696]
Wasso (INT3) [INT3]
:: Jan. 27, 2021, 11:47 p.m.
Why require the player who received the "disgusting message" to press the button? If the above were actually possible (IE: The system could tell when the message was "disgusting") why not make it automatic?gazz65 (GB1) said:why not have a button on player messages when a player sends a disgusting message
to another player . we can press that button and that player gets a 7 day ban from the game.
but there castle doesn't go in to dove so we can hit them . only way you can press it is if they
they send abusive messages. saves players sending ticket to ggs and nothing happens.
Ah yes, because the system is too flawed to actually make that determination. What about the really bad typists (like me) who don't always space properly, and don't always proof read their text? Certain trailing letters combined with the next word's leading letters can spell some "bad words". The auto filter HAS caught those on occasion, even when they were not meant as a way to try to circumvent the filter.
I would agree that a simple process to flag a message sounds great! But, it would then have to be reviewed and actioned. Any guess how many people would press that button if it showed up on a message from their rival? Justified or not.
Also, to prove my point above about the leading letters: It isn't always safe to press the 'button'.........
[5174769]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 28, 2021, 4:28 p.m.
agree with what your saying about spelling and spacing words out
which might look like they swearing or being abusive.
but we all know what words mean and we all know when some
one is being abusive. if say your a woman and someone sends
you a message with you fffing c-w and leave the game if you don't like
being attacked that's abusive and we should be able to press a button which
bans that player.
imagine if these players got the ban and there castles were then
wide open for players to attack them. I think the language would stop quite a bit.
maybe when someone gets the ban ggs can then look at that message and decide
if it should stay or be lifted. only an idea that's all I am trying to say.
which might look like they swearing or being abusive.
but we all know what words mean and we all know when some
one is being abusive. if say your a woman and someone sends
you a message with you fffing c-w and leave the game if you don't like
being attacked that's abusive and we should be able to press a button which
bans that player.
imagine if these players got the ban and there castles were then
wide open for players to attack them. I think the language would stop quite a bit.
maybe when someone gets the ban ggs can then look at that message and decide
if it should stay or be lifted. only an idea that's all I am trying to say.
[5174809]
Wasso (INT3) [INT3]
:: Jan. 29, 2021, 1:58 a.m.
Like I said, I AGREE that it would be great to have a simple process like that. But, the ability to ABUSE the anti-abuse button, is way to high.
Think about it, if the button to auto ban someone was ALWAYS there and available, why wouldn't you press it on your enemy in war? Even if they just sent a message saying "Nice hit!" (Yes, I have actually sent that message and meant it in a positive way) But, the word "hit" is in there. That could be abusive. If the system flagged that and allowed the button to activate: BAM! Insta-ban on an innocent player. Then, since there is no protection, the entire Alliance burns them hard and fast.
Giving that power to the Playerbase, simply would not work.
IF there was a button to send the message for REVIEW by GGS to action as they saw fit, maybe. But, you would have to accept the silence that would come with it. It could take a while to get to each and every report. I would expect the number of false reports would be high. Maybe give a ban out to someone who sends in a blatantly false report? - But, this would also be a judgement call on many of them. Just look at the closed thread on that similar topic about WORDS and the expectation that people have to make judgment calls on when those words are really bad enough.......
Again, I do AGREE that there are some pretty low life people who say some apprehensible things on this game. They think it is just in the name of "fun". Along with the perceived anonymity that the internet provides, it can bring out the worst in people. But, to give the power to insta-ban someone without protection? That is just too much temptation for even the "nice" people to be given.......
Think about it, if the button to auto ban someone was ALWAYS there and available, why wouldn't you press it on your enemy in war? Even if they just sent a message saying "Nice hit!" (Yes, I have actually sent that message and meant it in a positive way) But, the word "hit" is in there. That could be abusive. If the system flagged that and allowed the button to activate: BAM! Insta-ban on an innocent player. Then, since there is no protection, the entire Alliance burns them hard and fast.
Giving that power to the Playerbase, simply would not work.
IF there was a button to send the message for REVIEW by GGS to action as they saw fit, maybe. But, you would have to accept the silence that would come with it. It could take a while to get to each and every report. I would expect the number of false reports would be high. Maybe give a ban out to someone who sends in a blatantly false report? - But, this would also be a judgement call on many of them. Just look at the closed thread on that similar topic about WORDS and the expectation that people have to make judgment calls on when those words are really bad enough.......
Again, I do AGREE that there are some pretty low life people who say some apprehensible things on this game. They think it is just in the name of "fun". Along with the perceived anonymity that the internet provides, it can bring out the worst in people. But, to give the power to insta-ban someone without protection? That is just too much temptation for even the "nice" people to be given.......
[5174874]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 29, 2021, 1:52 p.m.
Game would be good if we could sort out the abusive bullying players and the bugs.Wasso (INT3) said:Like I said, I AGREE that it would be great to have a simple process like that. But, the ability to ABUSE the anti-abuse button, is way to high.
Think about it, if the button to auto ban someone was ALWAYS there and available, why wouldn't you press it on your enemy in war? Even if they just sent a message saying "Nice hit!" (Yes, I have actually sent that message and meant it in a positive way) But, the word "hit" is in there. That could be abusive. If the system flagged that and allowed the button to activate: BAM! Insta-ban on an innocent player. Then, since there is no protection, the entire Alliance burns them hard and fast.
Giving that power to the Playerbase, simply would not work.
IF there was a button to send the message for REVIEW by GGS to action as they saw fit, maybe. But, you would have to accept the silence that would come with it. It could take a while to get to each and every report. I would expect the number of false reports would be high. Maybe give a ban out to someone who sends in a blatantly false report? - But, this would also be a judgement call on many of them. Just look at the closed thread on that similar topic about WORDS and the expectation that people have to make judgment calls on when those words are really bad enough.......
Again, I do AGREE that there are some pretty low life people who say some apprehensible things on this game. They think it is just in the name of "fun". Along with the perceived anonymity that the internet provides, it can bring out the worst in people. But, to give the power to insta-ban someone without protection? That is just too much temptation for even the "nice" people to be given.......
at least I got a free deco over 3k PO of ggs. must be going to bring out 3k plus po
items to buy in shop soon.
[5174991]
flug (NL1) [NL1]
:: Jan. 30, 2021, 8:50 a.m.
in the dutch server there is an button in mailbox where you can ignore that playergazz65 (GB1) said:agree with what your saying about spelling and spacing words out
which might look like they swearing or being abusive.
but we all know what words mean and we all know when some
one is being abusive. if say your a woman and someone sends
you a message with you fffing c-w and leave the game if you don't like
being attacked that's abusive and we should be able to press a button which
bans that player.
imagine if these players got the ban and there castles were then
wide open for players to attack them. I think the language would stop quite a bit.
maybe when someone gets the ban ggs can then look at that message and decide
if it should stay or be lifted. only an idea that's all I am trying to say.
[5175198]
Wasso (INT3) [INT3]
:: Jan. 31, 2021, 11:29 p.m.
All servers have that. But, @gazz65 (GB1) is looking for something with more consequences........flug (NL1) said:in the dutch server there is an button in mailbox where you can ignore that playergazz65 (GB1) said:agree with what your saying about spelling and spacing words out
which might look like they swearing or being abusive.
but we all know what words mean and we all know when some
one is being abusive. if say your a woman and someone sends
you a message with you fffing c-w and leave the game if you don't like
being attacked that's abusive and we should be able to press a button which
bans that player.
imagine if these players got the ban and there castles were then
wide open for players to attack them. I think the language would stop quite a bit.
maybe when someone gets the ban ggs can then look at that message and decide
if it should stay or be lifted. only an idea that's all I am trying to say.
[5175563]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 2, 2021, 9:26 a.m.
Correct I am looking for longer bans instead of one day to start of with.Wasso (INT3) said:All servers have that. But, @gazz65 (GB1) is looking for something with more consequences........flug (NL1) said:in the dutch server there is an button in mailbox where you can ignore that playergazz65 (GB1) said:agree with what your saying about spelling and spacing words out
which might look like they swearing or being abusive.
but we all know what words mean and we all know when some
one is being abusive. if say your a woman and someone sends
you a message with you fffing c-w and leave the game if you don't like
being attacked that's abusive and we should be able to press a button which
bans that player.
imagine if these players got the ban and there castles were then
wide open for players to attack them. I think the language would stop quite a bit.
maybe when someone gets the ban ggs can then look at that message and decide
if it should stay or be lifted. only an idea that's all I am trying to say.
first ban one week with your castles not in dove so you can be attacked.
second ban two week ban and third one total ban.
think once players got a weeks ban and come back to being burnt and nothing
left they might think twice about it.
would even go as far as not letting alliance support them while banned.
keep smiling it's good for your heart
[5175603]
flug (NL1) [NL1]
:: Feb. 2, 2021, 11:49 a.m.
so then i can ban my enemy even when he didn't say or do anything wrong?
that would be a great update
that would be a great update
[5175746]
UD1 (INT1) [INT1]
:: Feb. 2, 2021, 8:46 p.m.
My biggest annoyance is the unavailability of BTH resources , i spent 1500k coins to upgrade all the new research , i can onestly say i doubt if i complete 1 of the because it requires BTH resources , so guys do not waste your time or coins to upgrade them. believe me i have tried BTH several ways and to my shame money also , i even thought i might get some resources, and then you get swarm by big spending alliances that hit you non stop until your cleaned out .
I think the worst part is being on when points are counted because that is when you are swarmed and if you not there you have zero chance to defend even if you stack it with 20k defence they just send enough cleaners .
it just my opinion and all in all no one from my servers has not even tried to get them
I think the worst part is being on when points are counted because that is when you are swarmed and if you not there you have zero chance to defend even if you stack it with 20k defence they just send enough cleaners .
it just my opinion and all in all no one from my servers has not even tried to get them
[5175812]
flug (NL1) [NL1]
:: Feb. 3, 2021, 1:19 p.m.
i don't go to BTH because of that.