Forum: empire-en
Board: [590] Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
Topic: [74620] Alliance Officers' rights and options
[-74620]
IZINobleman [None]
:: March 23, 2012, 12:33 p.m.
Currently, there are only 3 possible roles in an alliance: Leader, General(s), Sergeant(s).
Each of these comes with a predefined set of what they can do.
I suggest that functions be separated from attributes, in such a way that a regular alliance member can also be given the right to mass email the other alliance members, post update bulletins, etc.
Each of these comes with a predefined set of what they can do.
I suggest that functions be separated from attributes, in such a way that a regular alliance member can also be given the right to mass email the other alliance members, post update bulletins, etc.
[1354729]
LegoNenen [None]
:: March 23, 2012, 1:32 p.m.
I agree
This is a very good idea!
This is a very good idea!
[1354730]
LittleMon2 [None]
:: March 23, 2012, 2:07 p.m.
i think the leader should decide what duties to allow the generals to do--there could be a checklist type page to let the leader choose. Some things the leader might not want to do and that could be someof the duties for the generals, but reserve all rights such as deciding how to use the donations and who to invite to the alliance.
[1354731]
LegoNenen [None]
:: March 23, 2012, 3:23 p.m.
Yes that is a GREAT idea
but it should be for any rank.
but it should be for any rank.
[1354735]
epictrollface [None]
:: March 23, 2012, 5:03 p.m.
No, the lowest rank has no privileges for a reason, if the Alliance leader doesn't want anyone to mess with anything such as the announcement board, then how can he stop others from messing with it if there are no ranks which prevent players from doing so, also there aren't any duties that need to be specifically given to one person, as a leader or a general, administrating an alliance is fairly simple and can be done alone.
[1354739]
bobbysbro [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 6:29 a.m.
dont like it,cos in my alliance only the people who are loyal and i trust i let be genrals otherwise people mess up the alliance
[1354747]
epictrollface [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 2:50 p.m.
Exactly, that's what those ranks are for...
[1354749]
LegoNenen [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 5:01 p.m.
This idea is that the leader could CHOOSE what privilege you want somebody to have (SPECIFIC)
It is a great idea.
It is a great idea.
[1354752]
epictrollface [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 7:34 p.m.
IZINobleman wrote: »in such a way that a regular alliance member can also be given the right to mass email the other alliance members, post update bulletins, etc.
Not exactly, he did clearly say that a regular alliance member could do all those things that could potentially mess up an alliance if those privileges were put into the wrong hands.
[1354753]
12kroko [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 7:44 p.m.
no i like things they way they are
[1354755]
Unknown
:: March 24, 2012, 9:33 p.m.
great idea I wish I could do this in my alliance
Jason Grace Praetor to the First Legion
SPQR
Jason Grace Praetor to the First Legion
SPQR
[1354756]
Itt2 [None]
:: March 24, 2012, 10:27 p.m.
I agree, that it would probably be nice for the leader to have more control over who can do what. But, look at all the post we already have about "How do I add someone to my alliance." "How do I make someone an Officer." How do I..."
And that is just what we see. How many of these does support get?
I think the developers probably want to keep it simple.
And that is just what we see. How many of these does support get?
I think the developers probably want to keep it simple.
[1354757]
IZINobleman [None]
:: March 25, 2012, 2:29 a.m.
Indeed, my suggestion would not make the game simpler.
However, I believe it would only be fair that experienced players have the option of having more control over gameplay and their alliance.
My suggestion went along the lines of the Leader being able to grant each and any individual specific privileges - check list style. Not to give everyone all the rights. It's about precision and details.
However, I believe it would only be fair that experienced players have the option of having more control over gameplay and their alliance.
My suggestion went along the lines of the Leader being able to grant each and any individual specific privileges - check list style. Not to give everyone all the rights. It's about precision and details.
[1354772]
LegoNenen [None]
:: March 26, 2012, 1:13 p.m.
This idea could go along with the current one.
This is about the leader being able to choose what privileges somebody has.
This is about the leader being able to choose what privileges somebody has.
[1354793]
SpartnWrrior117 [None]
:: March 30, 2012, 1:53 a.m.
What are the specific roles' privileges of right now?
[1357009]
marcocokoo [None]
:: May 14, 2012, 5:13 a.m.
yea... a fellow christian...
agreed...but i still do not know how to give rank and responsiblity to others..
wanting to divide the responsibility
this seems to be a christian thread... wonderful
agreed...but i still do not know how to give rank and responsiblity to others..
wanting to divide the responsibility
this seems to be a christian thread... wonderful
[1357272]
bagofrice [None]
:: May 15, 2012, 1:41 a.m.
They should have an emergency leader rank. Only one person can fill the rank. This person gets to be leader if ever the leader is away for 1 day or more. but when the leader is there he acts like a general
[1357279]
StrongRoddy [None]
:: May 15, 2012, 4:35 a.m.
I like that ideaan emergency leader rank. Only one person can fill the rank. This person gets to be leader if ever the leader is away for 1 day or more.
[1357317]
America1 [None]
:: May 15, 2012, 10:04 a.m.
I like this idea a lot, because things like mass email do not really help only officers but everyone. Also, i think we should have the option of multiple leaders because if a leader does not want another leader, then they dont have to have one but if they do they can. Maybe like a senior leader and a junior leader, both have the privilages of a leader but the senior one has power over the junior one.
[1357318]
Aldreni-Warrior [None]
:: May 15, 2012, 10:11 a.m.
What if:
Leader
Co-Leader
General
Sergeant
Soldier
But it should be only 1Co-Leader when the Leader isnt here, so he will give him access to play in his role?
Leader
Co-Leader
General
Sergeant
Soldier
But it should be only 1Co-Leader when the Leader isnt here, so he will give him access to play in his role?