Forum: empire-en
Board: [590] Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
Topic: [74625] Alliance player limit
[-74625]
warclown [None]
:: April 6, 2012, 1:33 a.m.
Hey there ,you should remove the rubies needed for expand the number of allies.Its hard to make big alliances.
[1356579]
UltimateKing23 [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 12:23 p.m.
i totally agree
its unfair at the moment because no ruby players with alliances cant expand
poll please
its unfair at the moment because no ruby players with alliances cant expand
poll please
[1356581]
AmazingDobby888 [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 12:31 p.m.
lol i now right
[1356587]
M a x [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 6:16 p.m.
The problem with this is that people are going to make huge alliances, people will join, and then there will be like 5 alliances in the game. Plus the other people who are not in alliances will lose out so whole game and the whole war prospect of the game will be done. Also this has come up that gge needs ruby buyers to help the pay for the game.
[1356600]
Meisangry [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 7:35 p.m.
Im sorry but ggs need no make money. Im bored to death of non ruby player complaining that people who PAY get more advantages. Stop moaning about a free game which lets you pay to be better. I have donated over 50k rubies to my alliance an other over 100k. I would be annoyed if they were to be wasted. Anyway without the ruby cost any player with big resources could have 45 member alliances and then being in an alliance, like honour points, would mean nothing.
Rant Done.
Rant Done.
[1356602]
Bossdude [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 7:40 p.m.
The problem with this is that people are going to make huge alliances, people will join, and then there will be like 5 alliances in the game. Plus the other people who are not in alliances will lose out so whole game and the whole war prospect of the game will be done. Also this has come up that gge needs ruby buyers to help the pay for the game.
yes. then everyone will be in one alliance and then the game is pointless because you cant attack anyone in your alliance.
[1356604]
12kroko [None]
:: May 5, 2012, 7:51 p.m.
yep max is right
[1356655]
Danger1602 [None]
:: May 6, 2012, 4:23 p.m.
I agree with max but I say they should decrease the amount of rubies needed by a little bit
[1356666]
Luke Fierysword [None]
:: May 6, 2012, 8:07 p.m.
Danger1602 wrote: »I agree with max but I say they should decrease the amount of rubies needed by a little bit
Any by little bit I hope you mean a lot cuz even players who buy the cheaper rubies can't always donate the huge amounts of rubies needed to increase the membership limit
[1356683]
GranteD [None]
:: May 7, 2012, 8:10 a.m.
It is a donation and if all member donate bit by bit it will be enough not just depends on one or two person in the alliance to donate the rubies.Bit by bit you get increase members more ppl can donate then more then more.
[1356684]
Andrea50 [None]
:: May 7, 2012, 9:07 a.m.
OK all up you need just over 1.2 million rubies so you divide this buy 45 in the end you will only have to donate like 30,000 rubies each and this isn't that expensive as some players donate about 200,000 rubies. Stop you'r winging and continue to play and there is still a 45 member max on an alliance. So if they did this they would make up to 100 members so they still make the same amount of rubies.
[1356702]
Bossdude [None]
:: May 7, 2012, 7:34 p.m.
and also you can just get 70 rubies a week if you log on every day so you can build off of that.
[1357641]
StrongRoddy [None]
:: May 16, 2012, 11:16 p.m.
bumpalumpidydump
[1357643]
StrongRoddy [None]
:: May 16, 2012, 11:19 p.m.
The problem with this is that people are going to make huge alliances, people will join, and then there will be like 5 alliances in the game. Plus the other people who are not in alliances will lose out so whole game and the whole war prospect of the game will be done. Also this has come up that gge needs ruby buyers to help the pay for the game.
Im sorry but ggs need no make money. Im bored to death of non ruby player complaining that people who PAY get more advantages. Stop moaning about a free game which lets you pay to be better. I have donated over 50k rubies to my alliance an other over 100k. I would be annoyed if they were to be wasted. Anyway without the ruby cost any player with big resources could have 45 member alliances and then being in an alliance, like honour points, would mean nothing.
Rant Done.
I agree with both of these to the fullest, but I think they should just increase the amount of players to 5 or even 3, it really isn't too easy to get 890 rubies. GG please get a contract with some kind of game card company so I can just go down to 7 eleven and spend 5 bucks do get some rubies, I have neither a credit card nor a phone with administrative rights. I'ma make a thread about that right now
[1357786]
Devinology (INT1) [None]
:: May 17, 2012, 11:32 p.m.
The cost is extortionate for such a low budget game. I can't believe I even played this game for so long. This game is a royal piece of crap.
and by the way, the whole giant alliance thing is obviously already happening. i'll attack some crappy player from any alliance with the word "royalty" in it and all of a sudden i get stomped 8 times by top level players in another alliance with the word "royalty" in it. this game is a joke.
and by the way, the whole giant alliance thing is obviously already happening. i'll attack some crappy player from any alliance with the word "royalty" in it and all of a sudden i get stomped 8 times by top level players in another alliance with the word "royalty" in it. this game is a joke.
[1357789]
M a x [None]
:: May 17, 2012, 11:51 p.m.
Well, you should actually look how many "Royalties" there are. You mess with the bull, you get the horns(or in this case you mess with one bull, you get the other bulls horns).Devinology wrote: »The cost is extortionate for such a low budget game. I can't believe I even played this game for so long. This game is a royal piece of crap.
and by the way, the whole giant alliance thing is obviously already happening. i'll attack some crappy player from any alliance with the word "royalty" in it and all of a sudden i get stomped 8 times by top level players in another alliance with the word "royalty" in it. this game is a joke.
[1359912]
Jaded Sky [None]
:: June 7, 2012, 7:54 p.m.
The limit makes the game anti social to have that low of a limit right off the bat. You would think a higher player limit would be good for them in that it helps player retention.