Forum: empire-en

Board: [590] Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback

Topic: [74637] New soldiers

[1356512] Danger1602 [None] :: May 3, 2012, 11:56 p.m.

they should be a little faster

[1356560] bartman2000 [None] :: May 5, 2012, 4:27 a.m.

i think we could have a catepult for defence

[1356570] Itt2 [None] :: May 5, 2012, 6:28 a.m.

bartman2000 wrote: »

i think we could have a catepult for defence

You mean like something that you could build and then put on your wall and it would throw stones at your enemy?

[1356574] DarkAsgard [None] :: May 5, 2012, 10:12 a.m.

I think there are should be assasins, but it would be expensive to train, cost like about 100-300 or watever, the killing rate will be high, and could be use to espionage, if discovered it could defense itself

[1356575] DarkAsgard [None] :: May 5, 2012, 10:15 a.m.

Oh and i think the tools list should have ballista ( make by coins) and the ballista with explosives (make by rubies)

[1356577] DarkAsgard [None] :: May 5, 2012, 10:37 a.m.

I think there are should be assasins, could use to espionage or in battles
In espionage, when the assasins discovered they can fight the guards in the castle, if you have too few guards you will fail, too much you will win the assasins, the assasins still could spying the military or the economic after the fight (if you win).
In battles, you can recruit the assasins but the price will be high, both coins and rubies could use to recruit it, like 50 rubies or 100 - 300 coins to recruit one, the killing rate is high and the die rate will be low.

[1356578] Unknown :: May 5, 2012, 10:55 a.m.

thats manageable.

[1356617] Danger1602 [None] :: May 5, 2012, 9:29 p.m.

A heavy longbowmen

[1356618] Unknown :: May 5, 2012, 9:44 p.m.

a ranger. he uses a sword and bow, bow for defend, sword for attack

[1356624] Danger1602 [None] :: May 5, 2012, 11:02 p.m.

Awesome!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[1356647] Danger1602 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 1:23 p.m.

the ballista sounds great and a trebuche for defense

[1356648] 12kroko [None] :: May 6, 2012, 1:31 p.m.

I hate the idea for new soilders whats wrong with the soilders we have right now? 99% of the people that are posting on this thread dont even have over 500 good soilders and you want more types ?

[1356649] Danger1602 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 2:09 p.m.

yes it would make this game a lot more interesting

[1356650] Unknown :: May 6, 2012, 2:09 p.m.

I cant feed 500 soldiers. I can barely feed 150 even with my food outposts.

[1356652] Danger1602 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 3:32 p.m.

If you don't care don't post 12kroko

[1356653] Itt2 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 3:46 p.m.

No matter how many soldiers there are in the game, there are going to be 4 that everyone builds if they have them. The 2 best defenders and the 2 best attackers. Adding a large array of choices really is rather pointless.

[1356654] 12kroko [None] :: May 6, 2012, 4:14 p.m.

Jason Grace wrote: »

I cant feed 500 soldiers. I can barely feed 150 even with my food outposts.

eactly i can feed over 500 easily so why do you all want a stronger army when you dont even have a good amount of soilders now it would only benift the high lvl ppl. And your right itt2 in the end everyone is still going to make 4 types of soilders so whats the point oh and if you want new soilders get the vetrans

[1356664] Unknown :: May 6, 2012, 6:33 p.m.

Itt2 wrote: »

No matter how many soldiers there are in the game, there are going to be 4 that everyone builds if they have them. The 2 best defenders and the 2 best attackers. Adding a large array of choices really is rather pointless.

I actually use pure 1 handed swordsmen because they are good at just about everything in numbers

[1356672] Danger1602 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 11:04 p.m.

I agree with Jason

[1356673] Itt2 [None] :: May 6, 2012, 11:28 p.m.

Jason Grace wrote: »

I actually use pure 1 handed swordsmen because they are good at just about everything in numbers

If you were on world 1 I could help you test that theory out if you wanted. :P