Forum: empire-en

Board: [816] News from the world of Empire

Topic: [344403] Information about the Uniform of the nutcracker warrior set

[-344403] ang1243 (GB1) [GB1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 5:02 p.m.

Hey guys,

Due to the reports we got, we want to inform you about a display issue regarding a set bonus for the Uniform of the nutcracker warrior.

It currently says Attack cooldown against NPC targets, which should obviously include also NPCs like the Nomads. Unfortunately, the description is wrong. The correct text should be Attack cooldown against robber baron castles.This is the reason the bonus does not work on Nomands. We will fix this in our next update.

Also, due to the feedback we have received regarding the issue, we are also evaluating this very set bonus within the team. As soon as we have more info on how we want to proceed with this issue, we will let you know.

Apologies for the inconvenience!

Best,
Your Empire Family

[4872927] ali hassan (INT1) [INT1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 5:36 p.m.

It's a ridiculous set for me then 

[4872935] Scandy (GB1) [GB1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 5:39 p.m.

utter and complete waste of space if only against RBs (which isn't even correct as it works agains towers in Ice, Fire and Sand which aren't Robber Barons technically).

Would be interesting to find out what is a robber baron and what is not. 

Only logical thing would be to change the effect rather than the description. I understand it can't work in Storm or against Dragons or Fortresses, but it should work against Nomads, Sams and Khan Camps

[4872949] gman3073 (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 5:54 p.m.

hahahahaha no

[4872952] Jer1 (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 5:55 p.m.

so will the correction be to just change the words, or will you actually change the cooldown effect to actually work on ALL NPCs?
cause if its only gonna work on RBCs its a waste of equipment

[4872961] WarriorDspong (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 6:06 p.m.

agree with all the above!   Make effective against all NPC targets.   The only reason to get this equip set and to spend the effort to max it out is if it is useful in events.  Especially against the khan tower.   Please make the cool down effective for events, especially nomads.  Otherwise, its pretty useless.   


We were all excited about this set of equipment to help especially with khan tower cool down.  If you make it only against robber barons, its a waste of space.

[4872973] dustinlj21 (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 6:16 p.m.

We had all counted on the cooldown for ALL NPCs, namely the samurai camps, nomad camps, and especially the Khan tower.  

A lot of players rushed through the event book to have this commander for the samurai event only to be disappointed.  Fix your "false advertising" by making the commander work as advertised, not by changing its description.  THAT is what's fair.

[4873006] Awesomecastle13 (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 6:55 p.m.

So we are wasting our time.  Many of us wanted that set to be cool down vs all NPCs.  Particularly with the Khan Tower event.  I want the tools wasted on this then back.  Go to Hell, GGE!

[4873019] UltimateJhon (GB1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:07 p.m.

Refunds please

[4873024] sir-haba (SKN1) [SKN1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:09 p.m.

yep its GGS bullshit again

[4873026] Death77 (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:13 p.m.

it said (NPC) not RBC not ice towers not Fire towrs nor Dessert towers   NPC means NPC 

Very Disappointing GGE

-Death77   >:( 

[4873029] Lord septimus (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:22 p.m.

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

[4873032] Friedrich IV (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:27 p.m.

Lord septimus (US1) said:

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

It wasn't mentioned because it wasn't known until people started getting mad that it wasn't working

Oversight on developer's part to label it improperly

When it's discussed on Monday, as it says, we'll try and convince them to make it what we thought it was going to be.

[4873035] Lord septimus (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:30 p.m.

BM_Friedrich said:

Lord septimus (US1) said:

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

It wasn't mentioned because it wasn't known until people started getting mad that it wasn't working

Oversight on developer's part to label it improperly

When it's discussed on Monday, as it says, we'll try and convince them to make it what we thought it was going to be.

Thanks for the insight, when you say it wasn't known does that mean the developers accidently made it only work on towers or it was intentional? 

I appreciate the response, and good luck on monday. 

[4873040] Lady Nym (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:34 p.m.

GGE you are just amazing. Lord Septimus had a nice wish for you all. I will add mine: for christmas i hope you all get chronic ingrown toenails.

[4873041] Friedrich IV (US1) [None] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 7:34 p.m.

Lord septimus (US1) said:

BM_Friedrich said:

Lord septimus (US1) said:

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

It wasn't mentioned because it wasn't known until people started getting mad that it wasn't working

Oversight on developer's part to label it improperly

When it's discussed on Monday, as it says, we'll try and convince them to make it what we thought it was going to be.

Thanks for the insight, when you say it wasn't known does that mean the developers accidently made it only work on towers or it was intentional? 

I appreciate the response, and good luck on monday. 

It was intended to only work on towers, but the text reading NPC was unintentional. It was mislabeled, it should have been robber baron castles instead of NPCs.

I don't know how they didn't realize this as it seems like an obvious error, but it basically created an environment of false advertising for all of us.

I wouldn't have pushed as hard to get it this fast if I knew it was just for towers

[4873069] Kiwikiler95 (AU1) [AU1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 8:06 p.m.

yeah im now going to put in zero effort to collect this set now can this event just have a weird issue and have to be shutdown like now and bring on next months seasonal with a much better more usefull com please

Edit: i might put in some effort just for the gems put all 4 on a different set get some nice bonuses

[4873083] sir-haba (SKN1) [SKN1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 8:16 p.m.

BM_Friedrich said:

Lord septimus (US1) said:

BM_Friedrich said:

Lord septimus (US1) said:

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

It wasn't mentioned because it wasn't known until people started getting mad that it wasn't working

Oversight on developer's part to label it improperly

When it's discussed on Monday, as it says, we'll try and convince them to make it what we thought it was going to be.

Thanks for the insight, when you say it wasn't known does that mean the developers accidently made it only work on towers or it was intentional? 

I appreciate the response, and good luck on monday. 

It was intended to only work on towers, but the text reading NPC was unintentional. It was mislabeled, it should have been robber baron castles instead of NPCs.

I don't know how they didn't realize this as it seems like an obvious error, but it basically created an environment of false advertising for all of us.

I wouldn't have pushed as hard to get it this fast if I knew it was just for towers

yes, they make totally new commander with totally new feature(or is some else commander only for rbc) but just write it wrong, and it looks like the old commanders but slightly better.

[4873161] Awesomecastle13 (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 10:20 p.m.

BM_Friedrich said:

Lord septimus (US1) said:

That's complete dogshit.

You guys just took out the biggest reason why most people were going to try and get it.

And I like how you guys "accidently" had a display issue with it while never talking about it during the actual announcement of the set.

GGE I hope that everywhere you walk you step on legos. 

It wasn't mentioned because it wasn't known until people started getting mad that it wasn't working

Oversight on developer's part to label it improperly

When it's discussed on Monday, as it says, we'll try and convince them to make it what we thought it was going to be.

Thanks for this info, if they don't change it to what it was advertized as then they ought pay back those who wasted tools and tokens on it.

[4873174] Awesomecastle13 (US1) [US1] :: Dec. 1, 2017, 10:46 p.m.

I would like to thank GGE for wasting my time on a worthless commander set.  I spent valuable time, 80k of SAMS tokens, tons of tools, coins and men to get this done only to find out that GGE the "bait and switch" on the Merry Moon set.  Only reason I did it was for that cool down VS NPCs.  Not freaking idiotic RBCs.  If it does not get fixed to effect all NPCs then I want a full refund of materials, men and coins back.