ultra seems reasonable but rest dont know what they are on about lol
they must be smoking plastic
As he's a multi accounter ?Ahmed MERLIN (GB1) said:why is there 3 against hakhat lol
ultra seems reasonable but rest dont know what they are on about lol
they must be smoking plastic
This is all fictional , just something to relax to while I watch the Hollyoaks omnibus.
We congratulated CG , I would of congratulated more personally but by time it was ceased I was having Laptop problems.
Very concerning if players are multi-accounting to win if not fair play. Only you know if you cheated to win, Doesnt change the actual outcome either way.
Not sure what this means : HakHat (GB1) said:
What am I meant to be remembering ?Always remember, in game , in life , in anything you do :
~Ultra
multi accounts equals money money money
and may the sunshine bright in every ones life.
seems like they all have gone very strange
will have to get inspector clouseau on to this case.
give praise when is due lol
anyway those reports are actually good, usually people need 20k+ defenders for a 6th wave attack however toe has done it on 11k so i salute him and the others who did that in the war whether bsk or cg :-)
Alas, we have found a (modern) Sherlock among us......himnextdoor (GB1) said:Ahmed MERLIN (GB1) said:why is there 3 against hakhat lol
ultra seems reasonable but rest dont know what they are on about lol
they must be smoking plasticFor the second time today, I find myself saying, 'The lady doth protest...'
I was going to ignore your weak remonstrations, your posts without points, on the basis that you are obviously indulging in blind hero-worship but given that you are attempting to deflect enquiry rather than engage with it, I sense something more. I take it that CG and TRT have kissed and made up?
Why was HakHat banned do you think? Perhaps it is because it has been proven that he is a multi-accounter? And perhaps that explains why all his posts have disappeared here AND in other threads too. It seems to me that you know exactly who HakHat is and wish to defend him on that basis - Who would defend someone unless they had a vested interest in doing so?
And it makes me wonder; are you HakHat as well? I mean, both you and HakHat seem pleasantly disposed toward Ultra despite the fact he watches Hollyoaks and you both employ the same mocking phraseology - and like HakHat, you refuse to enter into an analysis of the facts.
We know that the player who has control of the HakHat account created the first list of links from within at least three accounts; his own, the Toe account and a BSK player's account. We know that the first three links of that post were produced one after the other over a short time period on three accounts... Unbeknown to you at this point is the fact that we have this link too:
Toe sent that message at about the same time as the second screenshot in his first list was produced and that places the time at about three in the afternoon...
At this point, Toe has the three links to the first three screenshots open in his explorer
After he sent that PM, Toe then assembled the screenshots of his reports from inside his own account. These screenshots were taken about a week earlier and over a period of some days and so he would have had to consult a list in order to locate them... Presumably, he had pasted the links into a notepad document or similar and saved it with the 'horrors wiped' annotations...
Then, with the screenshots opened on his explorer tabs and the notepad document open on his desktop, he logged onto the HakHat account, copied and pasted the three links open in his explorer to be posted here (in the wrong order), then copied and pasted the entire notepad document, with the annotations, into the same post... And about twenty minutes after he sent the 'HakHat is king' PM, HakHat posted that list of links on the forum.
The second set of links he posted shows that the person operating Toe's account also has access to AlderundLowe's account too.
Now, we all know how Toe likes to beat his chest and let everyone know how great he is and so his absence from the forum is very conspicuous... Why is that? Why doesn't Toe post tales of his own greatness here under his own name?
Well, it appears that the current user of the Toe account is the third person to 'own' it... I say 'own' but because he has no access to the e-mail address of the original Toe, he doesn't really have total control of the account. And so, in-game and with a false sense of security, Toe lauds HakHat, (himself) while in the less secure environment of the forum, HakHat lauds Toe, (also himself.) He also makes sure that AlderundLowe gets some kudos too. (Alder was very quiet during the war, by the way.)
And given that Itchy/Dermy put in a stunning performance in the war, it is noteworthy that neither HakHat,Toe nor yourself have been able to find it in yourselves to give credit where it is really due.
Perversely though, GGS have banned the only account for which 'Toe' has the e-mail details... It will be interesting to see who else speaks on his behalf...
At the moment, Ahmed, that would be you.
A) if i opened up the screenie of pete sending a surrender message, then of a battle report from yourself hmd then of a screenie of my own then took a screenie of all those tabs open, would that mean i owned an account in bsk your account and mine?
it is well known you in particular dislike CG and some particular players, are you sure this isnt just an old grudge?C)why the heck would anyone want 3 accounts lol, 1 is more than enough trouble, and someone must be very lucky to be able to finance playing 3 accounts at the level the 3 you mentioned are
sorry for typos...on holidy so on a tiny phone lol
Probably shouldn't get involved, but couldn't all those screenies come from one account? just need the battle reps?himnextdoor (GB1) said:HakHat (GB1) said:http://prntscr.com/c2yxk9
http://prntscr.com/c2yxqc
http://prntscr.com/c2yxun
http://prntscr.com/c2yxyw
http://prntscr.com/c2yy4e
http://prntscr.com/c2yy89
the amount of 6wave full horror hits we held on the wall... LOL
BSK did not do as well by a long shot
Will give props to Lord Ginn who managed to hold one of my hits with my typical , economical , set up - rarely do players manage to do that.Is it just me or have some of HakHat's posts gone missing? This list of reports tells a story too,,,
Look at the names of the links, they were taken one after the other over a short time period; just like the first three links in HakHat's other post. Here, Toe did the first five in his own account, jumped onto AlderundLowe's account to do the sixth one and then, with all the links open in their own tabs, he jumped onto the HakHat account in order to copy, paste and post them here.
Just how many accounts is Toe running?
you done A for pull and c for one
Well I have just rang interpol about this multi accounts and they are looking
in to this right now.
and that was my thinking too ang
I probably shouldn't get involved either but I did some detective work. If you look carefully in the background of the screenshots you can see the castle matches up with Toe's castle but those screenshots were posted by HakHat which means HakHat = Toe. Therefore HakHat got banned so he's probably in Toe's account since that wasn't banned.ang1243 (GB1) said:Probably shouldn't get involved, but couldn't all those screenies come from one account? just need the battle reps?himnextdoor (GB1) said:HakHat (GB1) said:http://prntscr.com/c2yxk9
http://prntscr.com/c2yxqc
http://prntscr.com/c2yxun
http://prntscr.com/c2yxyw
http://prntscr.com/c2yy4e
http://prntscr.com/c2yy89
the amount of 6wave full horror hits we held on the wall... LOL
BSK did not do as well by a long shot
Will give props to Lord Ginn who managed to hold one of my hits with my typical , economical , set up - rarely do players manage to do that.Is it just me or have some of HakHat's posts gone missing? This list of reports tells a story too,,,
Look at the names of the links, they were taken one after the other over a short time period; just like the first three links in HakHat's other post. Here, Toe did the first five in his own account, jumped onto AlderundLowe's account to do the sixth one and then, with all the links open in their own tabs, he jumped onto the HakHat account in order to copy, paste and post them here.
Just how many accounts is Toe running?
Still need to investigate Alderundlowe though.
http://prntscr.com/c595nn
http://prntscr.com/c596vq
who would post someone else's screenie?hornby19 (GB1) said:doesnt proove anything mate...if i posted one of your screenie does that mean i am you?
i know that they arent multi qccounts but it seems you are convinced they arehimnextdoor (GB1) said:hornby19 (GB1) said:doesnt proove anything mate...if i posted one of your screenie does that mean i am you?
HakHat said:"Will give props to Lord Ginn who managed to hold one of my hits with my typical , economical , set up - rarely do players manage to do that. "
But HakHat didn't send a single effective attack at anyone. HakHat was writing as Toe... Look at this:
Notice how Toe makes the same grammatical error as HakHat does by placing a space before the comma.
There is absolutely no doubt that HakHat and Toe are the same person. And that means that Toe/HakHat is guilty of infracting GGS's Terms and Conditions which in turn means that the Toe account at least should be deleted on the basis that it was bought, sold and traded.