Forum: empire-en

Board: [817] War Updates

Topic: [346353] GB1 Server War

[4903659] msantos29 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 6:56 p.m.

Batten (GB1) said:

@UltraFlavoured (GB1) thank you for the screenshot and the clarification it is appreciated.  It would be a lot of reports possibly requiring employing someone to do it.  Shame GGE can't offer that as a service during war as an war correspodent service from CM's lol.  Hopefully gives people a flavour as was pretty epic point in the conflict.  Just felt it would be the type of thing players not directly involved might be interested to see and help people to understand the level of support and attacks involved.  Tough to say for sure but probably somewhere in region of 160,000 -200,000 attackers incoming.  Maybe slightly less.   Not sure I've seen that before outside of Command Centre attacks.  Right call on the flags and I'm sure the player concerned appreciates it.  You can see why op captures are problematic from the level of support.  Virtually no individual or alliance could without significant time or effort release an op from capture without a. a lot of time b. a disproportionately large number of troops and c.  without focusing a wider conflict down to one single point of attack.  Not sure how that parallels US Server but interested to hear their views.  Maybe Op's is an area of game could be looked at and developed.       

@Batten (GB1) 
i can see 446 attacks coming in Ultras screenshot.

Most players on the "Baddies" Team have 6 waves, so the armies will have about 2500/3000 troops each.

But lets say the armies have 2250 troops each.

446 attacks x 2250 troops per army =1 003 500 troops - so thats 1 million attackers that died, right? 

[4903667] samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 7:04 p.m.

msantos29 (GB1) said:

Batten (GB1) said:

@UltraFlavoured (GB1) thank you for the screenshot and the clarification it is appreciated.  It would be a lot of reports possibly requiring employing someone to do it.  Shame GGE can't offer that as a service during war as an war correspodent service from CM's lol.  Hopefully gives people a flavour as was pretty epic point in the conflict.  Just felt it would be the type of thing players not directly involved might be interested to see and help people to understand the level of support and attacks involved.  Tough to say for sure but probably somewhere in region of 160,000 -200,000 attackers incoming.  Maybe slightly less.   Not sure I've seen that before outside of Command Centre attacks.  Right call on the flags and I'm sure the player concerned appreciates it.  You can see why op captures are problematic from the level of support.  Virtually no individual or alliance could without significant time or effort release an op from capture without a. a lot of time b. a disproportionately large number of troops and c.  without focusing a wider conflict down to one single point of attack.  Not sure how that parallels US Server but interested to hear their views.  Maybe Op's is an area of game could be looked at and developed.       

i can see 446 attacks coming in Ultras screenshot.

Most players on the "Baddies" Team have 6 waves, so the armies will have about 2500/3000 troops each.

But lets say the armies have 2250 troops each.

446 attacks x 2250 troops per army =1 003 500 troops - so thats 1 million attackers that died, right? 

there were a lot of tool cleans so losses would be less than that, dont matter shit load of attackers taken out regardless.

[4903673] msantos29 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 7:08 p.m.

samasensei (US1) said:

msantos29 (GB1) said:

Batten (GB1) said:

@UltraFlavoured (GB1) thank you for the screenshot and the clarification it is appreciated.  It would be a lot of reports possibly requiring employing someone to do it.  Shame GGE can't offer that as a service during war as an war correspodent service from CM's lol.  Hopefully gives people a flavour as was pretty epic point in the conflict.  Just felt it would be the type of thing players not directly involved might be interested to see and help people to understand the level of support and attacks involved.  Tough to say for sure but probably somewhere in region of 160,000 -200,000 attackers incoming.  Maybe slightly less.   Not sure I've seen that before outside of Command Centre attacks.  Right call on the flags and I'm sure the player concerned appreciates it.  You can see why op captures are problematic from the level of support.  Virtually no individual or alliance could without significant time or effort release an op from capture without a. a lot of time b. a disproportionately large number of troops and c.  without focusing a wider conflict down to one single point of attack.  Not sure how that parallels US Server but interested to hear their views.  Maybe Op's is an area of game could be looked at and developed.       

i can see 446 attacks coming in Ultras screenshot.

Most players on the "Baddies" Team have 6 waves, so the armies will have about 2500/3000 troops each.

But lets say the armies have 2250 troops each.

446 attacks x 2250 troops per army =1 003 500 troops - so thats 1 million attackers that died, right? 

there were a lot of tool cleans so losses would be less than that, dont matter shit load of attackers taken out regardless.

Tool cleans????  really??? So you're saying we have Batten, Mikeshot, etc.. involved with toolcleaning?



Pretty useless also... with so many on the CY, winning the wall kinda loses relevance.
But seeing the brilliance of this plan, im not sure it's organisers would be able to understand this....

this was probably the worst plan in the whole history of planning.

[4903739] samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 8:44 p.m.

msantos29 (GB1) said:

samasensei (US1) said:

msantos29 (GB1) said:

Batten (GB1) said:

@UltraFlavoured (GB1) thank you for the screenshot and the clarification it is appreciated.  It would be a lot of reports possibly requiring employing someone to do it.  Shame GGE can't offer that as a service during war as an war correspodent service from CM's lol.  Hopefully gives people a flavour as was pretty epic point in the conflict.  Just felt it would be the type of thing players not directly involved might be interested to see and help people to understand the level of support and attacks involved.  Tough to say for sure but probably somewhere in region of 160,000 -200,000 attackers incoming.  Maybe slightly less.   Not sure I've seen that before outside of Command Centre attacks.  Right call on the flags and I'm sure the player concerned appreciates it.  You can see why op captures are problematic from the level of support.  Virtually no individual or alliance could without significant time or effort release an op from capture without a. a lot of time b. a disproportionately large number of troops and c.  without focusing a wider conflict down to one single point of attack.  Not sure how that parallels US Server but interested to hear their views.  Maybe Op's is an area of game could be looked at and developed.       

i can see 446 attacks coming in Ultras screenshot.

Most players on the "Baddies" Team have 6 waves, so the armies will have about 2500/3000 troops each.

But lets say the armies have 2250 troops each.

446 attacks x 2250 troops per army =1 003 500 troops - so thats 1 million attackers that died, right? 

there were a lot of tool cleans so losses would be less than that, dont matter shit load of attackers taken out regardless.

Tool cleans????  really??? So you're saying we have Batten, Mikeshot, etc.. involved with toolcleaning?



Pretty useless also... with so many on the CY, winning the wall kinda loses relevance.
But seeing the brilliance of this plan, im not sure it's organisers would be able to understand this....

this was probably the worst plan in the whole history of planning.

lol bit of an over exaggeration there, unless u meant worse planning in the game,   i dont know about them sending tool cleans probably didnt, but i did lol rip my 500 wolves 

[4903785] msantos29 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 9:35 p.m.

i wouldn't know anything about Odins, except they're gonna get it next, as the 4th team in the might point ranking.

who was in 4th place before?

oh right.... look what happened to that thriving team....

poor choices have been made, or so the facts say.

[4903796] msantos29 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 9:45 p.m.

To every action there's a reaction..

Cant you at least get decent attackers to join??

[4903799] spontaneus1 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 9:48 p.m.

Another expert mass attack:

[4903803] UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 9:58 p.m.

@Karem GK (GB1)
Once again - Trying to bring me down to your level. Why has that image got anything to do with me..

@samasensei (US1)
 Seen as @Karem GK (GB1)  is my Number one groupie and cant keep my name out of their mouth for 2 minutes.
I can confirm 2 of the 3 players mentioned about tool knocking. Did for sure. and one did it when it was 1 v 1.

I for one have never done it. WOW Its pretty high up here :P 

@DarkerThenDark (GB1)
Nice screenshots. I believe theres a few missing.
Not sure who deserves the credit though. You guys for defending or James for sending 3 players full Defense on HoL in such as short space of time.

~Ultra

[4903808] samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:14 p.m.

UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:

@DarkerThenDark (GB1)
Nice screenshots. I believe theres a few missing.
Not sure who deserves the credit though. You guys for defending or James for sending 3 players full Defense on HoL in such as short space of time.

~Ultra

As a great forum warrior once said "Then post them"

[4903815] UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:24 p.m.

@samasensei (US1)  I dont tend to save reports that are not during a mass and even thats rare.
Plus no one wants to see fire casts reports. Just pointing out that was one biased screenshot.
And as mentioned all defenses are Defense HoL.

@Karem GK (GB1) If we go back to the start , You needed another 3 alliances to take on Odins. How well is that going for everyone ?
Your just an Ultra Groupie. While your at it my keyboard needs dusting

I thought he left to join TRT? Someone telling porkies. 


~Ultra

[4903824] spontaneus1 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:32 p.m.

Karem GK (GB1) said:

@UltraFlavoured (GB1)

How many times we said that that those Oddbins declared on us ? did we know who else was going to war them ? No we don't .. ^^ 3 to beat Oddbins ? LMAO , Wish Musks was still here would be more funny than that  

I'm sure it was a major coincidence that we had over 20+ incomings from trt when we declared. Sure, always the victims.

[4903829] UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:35 p.m.

@Karem GK (GB1) LOL EXACTLY MY POINT
You asked for help from 3 other alliances within minutes.
Bring 3 alliances into a war they could of avoided.

Just how you spin your biased stories - I will spin that one.

Shame on you guys. 
But as always I will play the villain. 

~Ultra

[4903830] UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:40 p.m.

Everyone on the forum can see which players have bad negative messages.

Maybe its just a coincidence they are all fighting on the same side.

We are at war. We are out numbered. We have to look after ourselves.
and We are doing just fine.

Hopefully my groupies wont use my name to bring me in on some biased war related text or images and I can relax.

~Ultra

[4903832] msantos29 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:41 p.m.

if you're going to gang up on another team, dont choose PG and SE as your side kicks man, ffs....

by the way, guess here to party wasn't really looking for a party... he's back at his home now.

[4903841] marc58 (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

RX made the call to join......Surrendered really get your facts right

[4903842] UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:53 p.m.

@Karem GK (GB1)  It all makes sense now. You dont actually read. You just take parts of my words and use them.
I said I will spin that story,. You dont come out with proof you just talk lol.
You make up a story , I make up a story. 
Events
CG Declare on Praets.
Odins Declare on TRT
Gondor,SE & PG declare and land a mass at the exact same time.

Make of that what you will.

Surrender? Not heard nothing - You got a screenshot?

Although the Alliance leader boards make an upsetting read.
4th to 20th.
Numbers dropping.
Assets moving.

Nice

~Ultra

[4903844] -CJ- (GB1) [GB1] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 10:54 p.m.

PG Tips is allowed in the war. It is a wing of Prae @msantos29 (GB1) so your point remains invalid there. You declared on Prae, so you declared on their whole family knowing what you were up against. As for SE and Gondor, two alliances for two alliances is more than a fair deal. Whoever brought Defiance into the war did that to themselves, to their own demise.

You declared on two more alliances. They were swapping players, but I am not mistaken to be under the impression that you too decided to swap players at the start of the war? What was that, 'Every action is met with a reaction'?

This war thread is getting boring. Less bickering, more fighting. Let's see more reports!!!

[4903849] UltimateJhon (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 11:04 p.m.

Let me just quickly summarise the war and how it’s going for you in reality, get your head out Mike’s bottom for a minute. 

Firstly, the proof you asked people to join in is that you planned this war for a month in advance and we were told. You wanted to win storm then declare on Odins, we knew that so we decided to win storm instead and in the last 48 hours we started storm and caught up and overtook by 300k and won.

You then sent 20 incomings at us and we pre-emptively declared war ahead of your schedule and timeline.

Then, as planned, all your alliances declared on us at the set time and sent your 265 attacks. Seeing as you breached the general rules of war that we follow, being only single alliance wars, we decided to stay a step ahead of you, again, and scale the war to RV’s. This crippled your weaker 5 alliances and made Mikeshot2 ask Sw / Sik for peace very quickly, but didn’t agree to terms (?).

Fast forward to recently, your side has asked for peace 12 times (counting all your alliances here) and tried to pull out of the RV war and then cunningly steal RV’s, your side has lost not far of a hundred players that’s triple digits, whereas we’ve only dropped 2 of our actual players and the rest went back to DMH because they were only here for storm. 

Ang has all the numbers on the war but I’m not sure how many Rev X and Wraith lost, but I’m confident that you guys will have hit triple digits very soon if not already. Gondor is out of top 20, correct me if I’m wrong please - Defiance is gone, SE is gone, PG is actually doing better than Gondor and I respect their staying but it isn’t a good idea as they stand to gain nothing.

We knocked Real Steel out the war in a day, and knocked RK out in hours. Gondor is just about out too, as with everything else except Praetorians and TRT who are only just starting to suffer and will fall below Odins might soon enough.

We don’t seem to need allies, CG and Odins alone would have won the war versus Defiance, Se, Pg, RS, Praets, TRT and Gondor just it would have taken longer. You declared with 4x the alliances and lost, you have no room to talk anymore. 

[4903851] razor69 (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

Duke Vincent (GB1) said:

I would like to comment on this thread and expose the underhand tactics employed by so called "fair play" alliances.

Defiance began a 1v1 alliance battle with Rev X about 10 days ago roughly. This was a straightforward affair, however Odins and CG then decided to both join in on it. They did not confine themselves to a war gaming battle, but threatened by message and followed up by systematically stealing and stripping resource villages from practically all Defiance players.

This has went on for over a week , eventually forcing Defiance players to try to reclaim lost rv's and recapture. Odins / Rev X and CG have carried out multiple repeated attacks on single Defiance players in mornings, daytimes and evenings, alongside repeated tool knocking attacks and rv thefts. Single players are being hit up to a dozen times a day when they are clearly no threat anymore and already burning and badly damaged. That's not "fair play" - it's nothing more than bullying.

For the record, I have never taken a single rv from any other players on this server since I began playing this game nearly four years ago. Yet I have had 8 rv's stolen to date from Odins and Rev X players combined. I have all screenshots to prove it. Here's just one.



A 1v1 alliance battle is one thing, but when you are attacked by CG + Odins + Rev X players repeatedly at the same time again and again and again without recourse up to 12 times a day, it really gets a bit much and raises serious questions about the mindset, character and behaviour of these players.

There was no requirement or need to stoop to such tactics by CG  + Odins + Rev X combined. For them to conduct themselves in such manner whilst claiming to be "fair play alliances" is truly abhorrent and exposes them for the bullies they are.

A very unhealthy, controlling and manipulative group who should be of grave concern to all other players on the GB1 server.

thanks for the rvs ;p just to clear things up cos u have clearly been asleep the whole war , defiance declared on rev x , when rev x was already at war, so ur 1v1 thing is complete rubbish, and for the rvs , defiance and steel went for our rvs first so thank ur leaders for losin urs, and the tool  knocking? lol defiance declared and we hit back straight away only to be met with  tool knocking setups. duke, i dont think castles is the game for u, maybe my little pony or pokemon would suit u better

[4903852] UltimateJhon (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 23, 2018, 11:10 p.m.

ScorpionBK (GB1) said:

PG Tips is allowed in the war. It is a wing of Prae @msantos29 (GB1) so your point remains invalid there. You declared on Prae, so you declared on their whole family knowing what you were up against. As for SE and Gondor, two alliances for two alliances is more than a fair deal. Whoever brought Defiance into the war did that to themselves, to their own demise.

You declared on two more alliances. They were swapping players, but I am not mistaken to be under the impression that you too decided to swap players at the start of the war? What was that, 'Every action is met with a reaction'?

This war thread is getting boring. Less bickering, more fighting. Let's see more reports!!!

When you declare on an alliance, you don’t declare on their family. You silly sausage, if you declared on their family you would declare on their family not one alliance. Two alliances for two isn’t what happened, you silly sausage. What happened was 4 alliances for one, then 3 more on either side.

Swapping players? I think you’re mistaking Gondor losing players to somehow your side swapping players, you’re just losing them, you silly sausage. CG have every right to do as they please with their war button, it’s their war button you silly sausage, it’s a server war and if they want to add people to the enemy side then I don’t think you should be complaining. 

Silly suasages always complain about the barbecue and forget that they aren’t pigs anymore, just sausages.