Forum: empire-en
Board: [817] War Updates
Topic: [346353] GB1 Server War
[4904266]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 24, 2018, 10:49 p.m.
Some nice defenses there.
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.


~Ultra
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.


~Ultra
[4904289]
Spirit Bear (AU1) [None]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 1:01 a.m.
OMG ITS A MERICAL CG can beat empty/open castles!UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:Some nice defenses there.
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.
~Ultra
[4904294]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 1:37 a.m.
You beg for reports then resort to childish slander when they’re posted.Spirit Bear (AU1) said:OMG ITS A MERICAL CG can beat empty/open castles!UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:Some nice defenses there.
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.
~Ultra
[4904327]
smatter (INT1) [None]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 9:06 a.m.
Foolish comment. The combined posts by DarkerThenDark and Ultra show that Darker's side can still defend with numbers, but ultra's side are still hammering them hard enough that they have to chose where to defend. When they call this a strategy game, this is what they mean. One day you will get it.......Then again, maybe not.Spirit Bear (AU1) said:OMG ITS A MERICAL CG can beat empty/open castles!UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:Some nice defenses there.
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.
~Ultra
[4904332]
marc58 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 9:09 a.m.
smatter (INT1) said:Foolish comment. The combined posts by DarkerThenDark and Ultra show that Darker's side can still defend with numbers, but ultra's side are still hammering them hard enough that they have to chose where to defend. When they call this a strategy game, this is what they mean. One day you will get it.......Then again, maybe not.Spirit Bear (AU1) said:OMG ITS A MERICAL CG can beat empty/open castles!UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:Some nice defenses there.
Just to add a bit of true context to reports., Give or take a few of the ones already posted these are the last reports in my inbox.
~Ultra
Great Post, agree maybe not lol
[4904334]
STEVIEBEANZ (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 9:40 a.m.
wat?ScorpionBK (GB1) said:. Fairplay rules say that war is only fair if it is agreed or if an alliance is responding to a breach in the fairplay rules.
....
As far as fairplay rules go, the main cause was CG declaring on Prae, and that was against the rules....

[4904335]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 9:45 a.m.
@Spirit Bear (AU1) Not sure who you are in game but for players not involved or looking on form another server I just wanted to give a true reflection on what is happening.
They are some great defense reports - but all attacks are nit defended - Its strategy.
I dont get why theres a need for a slagging off match, Its a game you win some you lose some.
If you notice from my reports. I post the wins and the losses (Except the one previously)
~Ultra
They are some great defense reports - but all attacks are nit defended - Its strategy.
I dont get why theres a need for a slagging off match, Its a game you win some you lose some.
If you notice from my reports. I post the wins and the losses (Except the one previously)
~Ultra
[4904348]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 10:52 a.m.
Will try and keep these reps as unbiased as possible 
Reps i found in my inbox today, if i am missing any its either because they weren't forwarded or way too embarrassing to post it so feel free to post it yourself




















Never said thy were of all going to be quality reps but those are ALL of the ones in my inbox, as said if theres any missing post em

Reps i found in my inbox today, if i am missing any its either because they weren't forwarded or way too embarrassing to post it so feel free to post it yourself





















Never said thy were of all going to be quality reps but those are ALL of the ones in my inbox, as said if theres any missing post em

[4904490]
Xerxes I (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 5:34 p.m.
What happened has happened guys, now let's go back to the battlefield.
[4904508]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 6:02 p.m.
Here are some reports from my inbox from this afternoons incomings.




~Ultra




~Ultra
[4904560]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 25, 2018, 7:34 p.m.
@The Torrent (GB1) Yeah , Although some one the rules are justify some at massively outdated and open to interpretation.
Where possible makes no sense - 1 v 1's are 100% absolutely possible. Its how these wars started in the basics of them.
Still laugh that Odins Fury have got their own rules. But they actually go back to the roots of the game.
And in my opinion try and limit the amount of players using fire cast.
The worst of which is the BLATANT reverse tool knocking - which a player build one house to Level 5 - to make sure there farmers/militia on the wall. While hiding behind a fire/loot cast. Totally Laughable when you find them in 'Top' alliances that preach about fair play but are perfectly happy to allow that.
I dont tool knock at all.
~Ultra
Where possible makes no sense - 1 v 1's are 100% absolutely possible. Its how these wars started in the basics of them.
Still laugh that Odins Fury have got their own rules. But they actually go back to the roots of the game.
And in my opinion try and limit the amount of players using fire cast.
The worst of which is the BLATANT reverse tool knocking - which a player build one house to Level 5 - to make sure there farmers/militia on the wall. While hiding behind a fire/loot cast. Totally Laughable when you find them in 'Top' alliances that preach about fair play but are perfectly happy to allow that.
I dont tool knock at all.
~Ultra
[4905086]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 4 p.m.
Only goal in cg and odins game plan is the destructing of uk server and all other alliances
they see as competition to them.
they will say different but they want everything done by there way, ultra doesn't care
about gondor and what's happened to them. all he is interested in is himself and cg and cg twin alliance odins.
As for odins we all know what they want , not long ago they were at war and said they would hit everyone in
top 10 but odins never said only alliance they will never hit is cg.
they see as competition to them.
they will say different but they want everything done by there way, ultra doesn't care
about gondor and what's happened to them. all he is interested in is himself and cg and cg twin alliance odins.
As for odins we all know what they want , not long ago they were at war and said they would hit everyone in
top 10 but odins never said only alliance they will never hit is cg.
[4905101]
-CJ- (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 5:21 p.m.
I daresay today has been interesting. Several records have been broken i.e Philt with the 4k honour:
http://prntscr.com/i6emdm
On an unrelated note, the loot record has also been broken:
http://prntscr.com/i6en06
Returning to the related note prior to the unrelated one, honour looks strikingly high for those in the war. It is interesting to watch, for those who don't
One must find other ways to enjoy watching things when there are no reps!!! pmsl, nah joking.
Any reps for that 'failed' attempt? @Karem GK (GB1)
Can't have a war thread with no war reps!!!
http://prntscr.com/i6emdm
On an unrelated note, the loot record has also been broken:
http://prntscr.com/i6en06
Returning to the related note prior to the unrelated one, honour looks strikingly high for those in the war. It is interesting to watch, for those who don't

Any reps for that 'failed' attempt? @Karem GK (GB1)
Can't have a war thread with no war reps!!!
[4905114]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 6:07 p.m.
@gazz65 (GB1) Your becoming pathetic . False accusations
CG want destruction of UK server? Hmm 4 alliances v 1 alliance turn to 7 v 4.Yeah sounds like we wanted destruction of the UK sever.
I dont care? How do you know? You dont know me. My friends go far and wide.
I dont Dislike anyone within a game , but if I did you would be close to being one for your blatant ignorance.
All youve done is complain. Your boring me and most likely everyone else.
@Karem GK (GB1) I was rudely awoken before but when I was on I was also saving reps.
I will still post. Some will be the defense reports from your attack ones but cant be botherd to resort them.
All been good fun. I am sure the on lookers are enjoying the reads.
@ScorpionBK (GB1) If you send 400 attacks - 1 or 2 are going to get through. lol Nice observation though.
~Ultra
CG want destruction of UK server? Hmm 4 alliances v 1 alliance turn to 7 v 4.Yeah sounds like we wanted destruction of the UK sever.
I dont care? How do you know? You dont know me. My friends go far and wide.
I dont Dislike anyone within a game , but if I did you would be close to being one for your blatant ignorance.
All youve done is complain. Your boring me and most likely everyone else.
@Karem GK (GB1) I was rudely awoken before but when I was on I was also saving reps.
I will still post. Some will be the defense reports from your attack ones but cant be botherd to resort them.
All been good fun. I am sure the on lookers are enjoying the reads.
@ScorpionBK (GB1) If you send 400 attacks - 1 or 2 are going to get through. lol Nice observation though.
~Ultra
[4905116]
-CJ- (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 6:21 p.m.
@UltraFlavoured (GB1) I am 'confuddled', so to speak, as to what you are answering/replying to?
If you mean the bit about 'Odin's failed attempt', I treat it with caution. Couldn't know until, we on this forum, saw the reps!
If you mean the mass on the OP's, that depends on quantity/quality of troops defending, defences, attack strategy and quantity/qaulity of troops attacking.
However, if you're talking in general, then yes, despite depending on other such factors, generally, you would expect one or two to go through as did Odin's on those reps (I couldn't say that those reps amount to 400 though).
1 or 2 is better than none!
This war seems pretty eventful thus far, don't you agree?
If you mean the bit about 'Odin's failed attempt', I treat it with caution. Couldn't know until, we on this forum, saw the reps!
If you mean the mass on the OP's, that depends on quantity/quality of troops defending, defences, attack strategy and quantity/qaulity of troops attacking.
However, if you're talking in general, then yes, despite depending on other such factors, generally, you would expect one or two to go through as did Odin's on those reps (I couldn't say that those reps amount to 400 though).
1 or 2 is better than none!
This war seems pretty eventful thus far, don't you agree?

[4905128]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 6:30 p.m.
@ScorpionBK (GB1) Just to the Honour rankings. Sorry Didnt fully read the rest - Lots of rumours and mishaps appear in war. Whether true or not I just keep to basics.
Having an issue with created Imgs at moment so Reps will be later than planned .
~Ultra
Having an issue with created Imgs at moment so Reps will be later than planned .
~Ultra
[4905133]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 6:48 p.m.
It’s funny how you say we wanted the war but you lot declaredgazz65 (GB1) said:Only goal in cg and odins game plan is the destructing of uk server and all other alliancesKarem GK (GB1) said:UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:@Karem GK (GB1) It all makes sense now. You dont actually read. You just take parts of my words and use them.
I said I will spin that story,. You dont come out with proof you just talk lol.
You make up a story , I make up a story.
Events
CG Declare on Praets.
Odins Declare on TRT
Gondor,SE & PG declare and land a mass at the exact same time.
Make of that what you will.
Surrender? Not heard nothing - You got a screenshot?
Although the Alliance leader boards make an upsetting read.
4th to 20th.
Numbers dropping.
Assets moving.
Nice
~Ultra
Well done both anyway
they see as competition to them.
they will say different but they want everything done by there way, ultra doesn't care
about gondor and what's happened to them. all he is interested in is himself and cg and cg twin alliance odins.
As for odins we all know what they want , not long ago they were at war and said they would hit everyone in
top 10 but odins never said only alliance they will never hit is cg.
[4905135]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 6:54 p.m.
This is completely made up and untrue.
Defiance asked us for peace. https://prnt.sc/i6fltu
We told them we would be taking our RVs back before we accepted, we did. A defiance member started rogue launching on our RVs, we hit him at every castle.
Defiance members got mad at this as they wanted us to agree to their terms, even though they came to us and we owed them nothing. Defiance redeclared and then asked for a ceasefire,
defiance broke that ceasefire and we continued as normal.
Defiance asked us for peace. https://prnt.sc/i6fltu
We told them we would be taking our RVs back before we accepted, we did. A defiance member started rogue launching on our RVs, we hit him at every castle.
Defiance members got mad at this as they wanted us to agree to their terms, even though they came to us and we owed them nothing. Defiance redeclared and then asked for a ceasefire,
defiance broke that ceasefire and we continued as normal.
[4905139]
-CJ- (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 7:10 p.m.
@UltraFlavoured (GB1) I see what you mean now! More hits, more chance of wins ratio wise. Therefore, more honour.
It is possible. By the looks of it both sides must be doing their fair share of hitting considering the balance in the higher honour holders.
It is possible. By the looks of it both sides must be doing their fair share of hitting considering the balance in the higher honour holders.
[4905150]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 27, 2018, 8:09 p.m.
We didn’t ask, we took them back. If they wanted peace, they had to accept that.