Forum: empire-en
Board: [817] War Updates
Topic: [346353] GB1 Server War
[4902535]
Batten (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 11:21 a.m.
@UltimateJhon (GB1) I never said you described me as an idiot. I was referring to you describing Doc Martin as an idiot, you've also described players as "dummies" "Child" and so on. Perhaps if you read what I said you may have realised that instead you again jumped in and accused me of lying when I was simply relaying your own words from earlier in this thread back to you.
I'm sure players on En1 will also be interested to know that Taeliana has in the last couple of days returned to the game and is currently trying to capture ops from live and active players. So perhaps may be worth all alliances on En1 this morning that believe in fairplay and all En1 players who have invested in their ops looking to their defences. Dead accounts coming back to life near your castle is something for all of us to worry about now. Perhaps worth reconsidering your position and that of your alliance as this could be what the future looks like if you don't act now.
I'm sure players on En1 will also be interested to know that Taeliana has in the last couple of days returned to the game and is currently trying to capture ops from live and active players. So perhaps may be worth all alliances on En1 this morning that believe in fairplay and all En1 players who have invested in their ops looking to their defences. Dead accounts coming back to life near your castle is something for all of us to worry about now. Perhaps worth reconsidering your position and that of your alliance as this could be what the future looks like if you don't act now.
[4902546]
gazz65 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 11:56 a.m.
No fair play now on uk server that's gone right out of window.
the 6 alliances fighting cg odins revx wraith will get all the blame for fair play going
and also be to blame for everything else in the war.
ex multi account player Taeliana turns up all of a sudden
and takes 2 ops from a player well that in itself tells a story.
Disgraceful
the 6 alliances fighting cg odins revx wraith will get all the blame for fair play going
and also be to blame for everything else in the war.
ex multi account player Taeliana turns up all of a sudden
and takes 2 ops from a player well that in itself tells a story.
Disgraceful
[4902588]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 12:44 p.m.
CG Odins didn’t start using destruct commanders, Mikeshot2 and Praets were using them on 32 man
wolf attacks on firecasts, we then got a MM giving us the green light to return the favour.
Who started capping ops? Praetorians did and that’s why a member got kicked, but it’s too late. You guys
started that and CG are ending it, what do you expect? You admitted that’s the case in your
reply too so I don’t know why you went on to deny it later on.
Who bullied players to kick them out the game? CG declared for a fair 1v1 war, you guys declared (4 alliances)
on odins - so the answer would be you, not us.
We didnt start the RV war either, PG launched on our RVs before Sik gave us permission to return the favour
so I don’t see why you’re lying there either.
And again, PG were the first to hit in storm, we were very sternly told not to do it and the night Kaci and
Odins started getting fail spied in storms and then came the horns so we returned the favour,
please stop lying through your teeth lol.
i don’t know why you care so much about rules, it’s a bloody war where the only rules that count are the terms
ane comdiditons of the game which prevent things like multi accounting. Your server rules went out the window
when 4 alliances declared on one, you can’t expect any sort of fair play from us for that.
wolf attacks on firecasts, we then got a MM giving us the green light to return the favour.
Who started capping ops? Praetorians did and that’s why a member got kicked, but it’s too late. You guys
started that and CG are ending it, what do you expect? You admitted that’s the case in your
reply too so I don’t know why you went on to deny it later on.
Who bullied players to kick them out the game? CG declared for a fair 1v1 war, you guys declared (4 alliances)
on odins - so the answer would be you, not us.
We didnt start the RV war either, PG launched on our RVs before Sik gave us permission to return the favour
so I don’t see why you’re lying there either.
And again, PG were the first to hit in storm, we were very sternly told not to do it and the night Kaci and
Odins started getting fail spied in storms and then came the horns so we returned the favour,
please stop lying through your teeth lol.
i don’t know why you care so much about rules, it’s a bloody war where the only rules that count are the terms
ane comdiditons of the game which prevent things like multi accounting. Your server rules went out the window
when 4 alliances declared on one, you can’t expect any sort of fair play from us for that.
[4902607]
spontaneus1 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 1:01 p.m.
Ohh I love to smell of hypocrisy in the morning. When the 4v1 was declared every player was warned we consider it a war outside any normal fair play rules, please don't now act shocked that we are hitting with full force. The exact words used where the full extent of gameplay mechanics if I;m not wrong. The option to leave the war was presented at all times. As far as I know all of the following are part of gameplay mechanics: @Karem GK (GB1)
Rv caps
Destruct comms
Storm hits
op capping( pretty much the reason this is in the game as no way did ggs mean ops to be passed down from player to player when they quit)
The beauty of the fact jaxsta sat in pro while gondor has been taken apart around him, while mouthing off, only to be smashed as soon as he comes out of pro is poetic.
As for players being bullied out of the game? Would you care to provide evidence on these accusations or we going for the approach of crying victim, when you are actually the agressors in the war(not that there is a problem with this), just don't moan you have bitten off more than you chew.
Rv caps
Destruct comms
Storm hits
op capping( pretty much the reason this is in the game as no way did ggs mean ops to be passed down from player to player when they quit)
The beauty of the fact jaxsta sat in pro while gondor has been taken apart around him, while mouthing off, only to be smashed as soon as he comes out of pro is poetic.
As for players being bullied out of the game? Would you care to provide evidence on these accusations or we going for the approach of crying victim, when you are actually the agressors in the war(not that there is a problem with this), just don't moan you have bitten off more than you chew.
[4902612]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 1:08 p.m.
One of those are incorrect. From my point of view which I dont admit to knowing everything ( I missed the start of war)
But the game is escalation - Fire casts /Coms and Destruction Coms should be removed from the game. Would stop all the cop out excuses.
One uses fire cast, Its escalates to fire coms. Then one uses fire cast permanently and tools knocks. Escalates to Destruction commanders.
As I have mentioned previously I am part of CG but I haven't bullied anyone.
Lots of stupid things( In my opinion ) happen in war and this one has been no different.
A PG player stole My Rvs. Without me doing a single thing. Escalation makes me take one back.
The only alliance I have seen as innocent are Praetorions as far as im aware. No RVs steals.
@Karem GK (GB1) BSK broke up players went to alliances on both sides of the fence. Technically I started On CG's side as I was related briefly via 'The Dark Union'.
The way the server sees it - is what it is I have no idea what that is. But I will mentioned this. @Vengence (GB1) has had everything thrown at him - RV/OUTPOSTS Taken Burnt/ Destruction commanders and hit in storm. Yet I believe from talks with him hes sees it as a war game. A game of friendship. You do what you can for your alliances.
And now we fight side by side.
On the words of Tae - Shes returned to the game in her own account. Unlike half of the rest of the server so pointless bringing up that.
@Batten (GB1) That was the perfect amount of words and paragraphs for my simple brain to assess.
~Ultra
But the game is escalation - Fire casts /Coms and Destruction Coms should be removed from the game. Would stop all the cop out excuses.
One uses fire cast, Its escalates to fire coms. Then one uses fire cast permanently and tools knocks. Escalates to Destruction commanders.
As I have mentioned previously I am part of CG but I haven't bullied anyone.
Lots of stupid things( In my opinion ) happen in war and this one has been no different.
A PG player stole My Rvs. Without me doing a single thing. Escalation makes me take one back.
The only alliance I have seen as innocent are Praetorions as far as im aware. No RVs steals.
@Karem GK (GB1) BSK broke up players went to alliances on both sides of the fence. Technically I started On CG's side as I was related briefly via 'The Dark Union'.
The way the server sees it - is what it is I have no idea what that is. But I will mentioned this. @Vengence (GB1) has had everything thrown at him - RV/OUTPOSTS Taken Burnt/ Destruction commanders and hit in storm. Yet I believe from talks with him hes sees it as a war game. A game of friendship. You do what you can for your alliances.
And now we fight side by side.
On the words of Tae - Shes returned to the game in her own account. Unlike half of the rest of the server so pointless bringing up that.
@Batten (GB1) That was the perfect amount of words and paragraphs for my simple brain to assess.
~Ultra
[4902637]
Spirit Bear (AU1) [None]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 1:53 p.m.
this is why I hate humanity
[4902642]
spontaneus1 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 2:03 p.m.
Since you are seemingly purposely missing the point, please point me towards the set of set of rules odins have broke? I am yet to see a set or rules produced for a server war, apart from hit everything in red. As for destruct comms/fire comms, odins have been using fire comms vs fire casts, as anyone would do. As for bd comms, as I am aware none of us had used them yet, apart from myself on 1 hit. Odins and CG are completely separate alliances, as anyone who has ever been in either will tell you, rather than useless speculation from outside sources who know as much as a player from the US server would.Not sure where you have got the idea cg and odins are the same from. As it certainly wasn't from my post.
[4902643]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 2:05 p.m.
@Karem GK (GB1) I never said anything was right or wrong. I haven't captured any active players outposts.
If hers was still hers no extra outposts could of been captured.
The game has gone down this path of of times.
No one is being forced to War though. These things are happening now. If a player or an alliances doesn't want to take part , leave.
Anything that is happening can be avoided - If players are choosing not to avoid it - Then you cant really complain.
Lots of things being said about CG/Odins yet there are many others in this war.
~Ultra
If hers was still hers no extra outposts could of been captured.
The game has gone down this path of of times.
No one is being forced to War though. These things are happening now. If a player or an alliances doesn't want to take part , leave.
Anything that is happening can be avoided - If players are choosing not to avoid it - Then you cant really complain.
Lots of things being said about CG/Odins yet there are many others in this war.
~Ultra
[4902655]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 2:20 p.m.
You mean Prae tried to steal CG ops and CG did the exact same thing back, how OUTRAGEOUS pmsl
[4902656]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 2:22 p.m.
'lol @UltraFlavoured (GB1) just relaying a message for Ahmed Merlin he said you are the biggest hypocrite.
[4902676]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 2:50 p.m.
@samasensei (US1) LOL
I am not sure he understands. I haven't complained about anything during war. I have never started any of the underhand tactics except adding a little fire to my commanders.
I certainly havent cried about anything that I could of prevented.
I love him to provide us with some evidence.
In fact I have only mentioned things from my point on view. Also @Karem GK (GB1) never denied a player was taking outposts.
Funnily enough Taes former outposts are in Praetorians right now.
One could suggest this all started from Praetorians - But I have no idea how they ended up in there.
I am here talking through boredom - Like I have always done. I have a little moan here and there.
~Ultra
I am not sure he understands. I haven't complained about anything during war. I have never started any of the underhand tactics except adding a little fire to my commanders.
I certainly havent cried about anything that I could of prevented.
I love him to provide us with some evidence.
In fact I have only mentioned things from my point on view. Also @Karem GK (GB1) never denied a player was taking outposts.
Funnily enough Taes former outposts are in Praetorians right now.
One could suggest this all started from Praetorians - But I have no idea how they ended up in there.
I am here talking through boredom - Like I have always done. I have a little moan here and there.
~Ultra
[4902710]
Batten (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 3:19 p.m.
There is a difference between outside the fairplay rules and outside the game rules. My understanding is the original account holder was contacted on Skype and when asked about the capture was unaware of it. So if the account holder isn't playing the account who is. If that is happening then that is a problem for all alliances regardless of side. And from what I can see Praetorians on discovering an account being played in an inappropriate way in removing the player acted appropriately so looked forward to CG following their example to balance the scales and remove the Taeliana account until such as time as the original player can assume control of the account. I'm sure GGE support on request would lock the account if there is an issue.
[4902713]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 3:23 p.m.
.....UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:@samasensei (US1) LOL
I am not sure he understands. I haven't complained about anything during war. I have never started any of the underhand tactics except adding a little fire to my commanders.
I certainly havent cried about anything that I could of prevented.
I love him to provide us with some evidence.
In fact I have only mentioned things from my point on view. Also @Karem GK (GB1) never denied a player was taking outposts.
Funnily enough Taes former outposts are in Praetorians right now.
One could suggest this all started from Praetorians - But I have no idea how they ended up in there.
I am here talking through boredom - Like I have always done. I have a little moan here and there.
~Ultra
[4902742]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 3:54 p.m.
Zero proof. Again.Batten (GB1) said:There is a difference between outside the fairplay rules and outside the game rules. My understanding is the original account holder was contacted on Skype and when asked about the capture was unaware of it. So if the account holder isn't playing the account who is. If that is happening then that is a problem for all alliances regardless of side. And from what I can see Praetorians on discovering an account being played in an inappropriate way in removing the player acted appropriately so looked forward to CG following their example to balance the scales and remove the Taeliana account until such as time as the original player can assume control of the account. I'm sure GGE support on request would lock the account if there is an issue.
And when when I ask people for it they don’t have any
[4902747]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 4 p.m.
not gonna lie i wouldnt bother showing you proof as u would claim its fake, u tried saying i fabricated a rep on you showing u losing when u clearly did. Think proof can be provided for what batten has saidUltimateJhon (GB1) said:Zero proof. Again.Batten (GB1) said:There is a difference between outside the fairplay rules and outside the game rules. My understanding is the original account holder was contacted on Skype and when asked about the capture was unaware of it. So if the account holder isn't playing the account who is. If that is happening then that is a problem for all alliances regardless of side. And from what I can see Praetorians on discovering an account being played in an inappropriate way in removing the player acted appropriately so looked forward to CG following their example to balance the scales and remove the Taeliana account until such as time as the original player can assume control of the account. I'm sure GGE support on request would lock the account if there is an issue.
And when when I ask people for it they don’t have any
[4902762]
Batten (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 4:50 p.m.
Zero proof of what Jhon?. What did you ask people for? Zero proof that the account was inactive? Zero proof that the player left the game having played in Defiance? Zero proof that the a player in Gondor has had two ops captured by a CG player who had previously left the game? Players in EN1 can just search and see the capture in process so presumably you would agree to that being accurate, unless we've all developed a previously unknown bug which effects our monitors. Support can of course and I'm sure will check. Happy to accept their decision. Who did you ask and what did they say? You seem to work in generalisations whilst we are working in specifics.UltimateJhon (GB1) said:Zero proof. Again.Batten (GB1) said:There is a difference between outside the fairplay rules and outside the game rules. My understanding is the original account holder was contacted on Skype and when asked about the capture was unaware of it. So if the account holder isn't playing the account who is. If that is happening then that is a problem for all alliances regardless of side. And from what I can see Praetorians on discovering an account being played in an inappropriate way in removing the player acted appropriately so looked forward to CG following their example to balance the scales and remove the Taeliana account until such as time as the original player can assume control of the account. I'm sure GGE support on request would lock the account if there is an issue.
And when when I ask people for it they don’t have any
[4902781]
UltimateJhon (GB1) [None]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 5:21 p.m.
Obviously I don’t need proof the op is being captured, stop feigning ignorance. I’m beginning to think you are indeed ignorant.Batten (GB1) said:Zero proof of what Jhon?. What did you ask people for? Zero proof that the account was inactive? Zero proof that the player left the game having played in Defiance? Zero proof that the a player in Gondor has had two ops captured by a CG player who had previously left the game? Players in EN1 can just search and see the capture in process so presumably you would agree to that being accurate, unless we've all developed a previously unknown bug which effects our monitors. Support can of course and I'm sure will check. Happy to accept their decision. Who did you ask and what did they say? You seem to work in generalisations whilst we are working in specifics.UltimateJhon (GB1) said:Zero proof. Again.Batten (GB1) said:There is a difference between outside the fairplay rules and outside the game rules. My understanding is the original account holder was contacted on Skype and when asked about the capture was unaware of it. So if the account holder isn't playing the account who is. If that is happening then that is a problem for all alliances regardless of side. And from what I can see Praetorians on discovering an account being played in an inappropriate way in removing the player acted appropriately so looked forward to CG following their example to balance the scales and remove the Taeliana account until such as time as the original player can assume control of the account. I'm sure GGE support on request would lock the account if there is an issue.
And when when I ask people for it they don’t have any
Proof of the account being being owned or ran by another player or not the original owner, or the owner denying capturing outposts...
[4902789]
UltraFlavoured (GB1) [GB1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 5:43 p.m.
To my knowledge it certainly sounds like the Original Tae.
Obviously they say they are the original Tae.
But no valid proof is here as I aint in any skype rooms she may be in anymore.
and also no valid proof it isnt the original. I think we will all have to agree to disagree.
Seems to be only one side of the story being read in all cases. Im always interested to hear both sides then make my own mind up.
~Ultra
Obviously they say they are the original Tae.
But no valid proof is here as I aint in any skype rooms she may be in anymore.
and also no valid proof it isnt the original. I think we will all have to agree to disagree.
Seems to be only one side of the story being read in all cases. Im always interested to hear both sides then make my own mind up.
~Ultra
[4902790]
Defectus (US1) [US1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 5:44 p.m.
Others have said it and I'll say it again: Stop bickering about fair play "rules" and let's see some reports.
[4902797]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Jan. 21, 2018, 6:04 p.m.
Maybe people are right about fairplay rules should be stopped, but maybe fairplay rules would never be needed if GGE did their damn job and enforced the actual rules lolTheBlueIcicle (US1) said:Others have said it and I'll say it again: Stop bickering about fair play "rules" and let's see some reports.