Goodgame Studios forum archives ::

[-283259] JmsuddabyPlayer (GB1) [None] :: Sept. 11, 2015, 9:03 p.m.

is it ok for a member of the crimson guard lvl 70 to attack a player who is 270 legendary levels below him (big difference) but this player is well know for attacking well below his levels (outposts not mains) the big guy he is is this not a very short form of bully YES i think so the player has to be named as saddi (crimsom guard) request to all top ten alliances this type of player will lose so many players from the game just as much as to many comps will there should be a decrease honor lvl set at the higher lvls also maybe 50 legandary below as this would help the (non rubie players compete in the game ) otherwise they will leave in flocks please comment on this topic and post through the forum as this game will be dead in less than 12 months

[4112892] Graycat (US1) (Banned) [None] :: Sept. 11, 2015, 9:28 p.m.

Alliance News section is a better place for this thread.

[4113047] Rajan37 (IN1) [None] :: Sept. 11, 2015, 11:26 p.m.

JmsuddabyPlayer (GB1) said:

is it ok for a member of the crimson guard lvl 70 to attack a player who is 270 legendary levels below him (big difference) but this player is well know for attacking well below his levels (outposts not mains) the big guy he is is this not a very short form of bully YES i think so the player has to be named as saddi (crimsom guard) request to all top ten alliances this type of player will lose so many players from the game just as much as to many comps will there should be a decrease honor lvl set at the higher lvls also maybe 50 legandary below as this would help the (non rubie players compete in the game ) otherwise they will leave in flocks please comment on this topic and post through the forum as this game will be dead in less than 12 months

I think it wouldn't be fair.

[4113673] eagle strike (GB1) [None] :: Sept. 12, 2015, 11:39 a.m.

Technically no, but yes because if you remove legendary levels it would just be a level 70 attacking a level 70 but one stronger that that other. You can't really say that not fair because if legendary levels weren't added you would of said its fair because you wouldn't of known how far above you he is!

[4114359] Rajan37 (IN1) [None] :: Sept. 12, 2015, 7:57 p.m.

But now you have legendary levels.

[4116457] fujiwara (GB1) [GB1] :: Sept. 14, 2015, 8:57 a.m.

eagle strike (GB1) said:

Technically no, but yes because if you remove legendary levels it would just be a level 70 attacking a level 70 but one stronger that that other. You can't really say that not fair because if legendary levels weren't added you would of said its fair because you wouldn't of known how far above you he is!

If you remove legendary levels you probably take away a 5th wave and any other goodies applying to the attack too

That said, I also kinda don't get the objection. It's a war game. People attack each other. You're both level 70, it's hard to complain about. Playing a war game means getting burned sometimes, and being attacked by people out of your strength league sometimes. C'est la vie, put out fires, rebuild, off we go again