Forum: empire-en

Board: [818] General Discussion

Topic: [295690] My blog

[-295690] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 7:19 a.m.

Link : https://tipsfindergoodgameempirere.wordpress.com/

Make sure to visit it!

Interested at working? Pm me now!

[4242024] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 9:02 a.m.

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

[4242057] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 9:33 a.m.

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

[4242072] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 9:47 a.m.

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

[4242132] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 10:46 a.m.

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

Yes, but attacker gets a chance to defeat 2 flanks, so attackers whole army will fight at the courtyard and the defender will lose as the defender didnt finish any units of the attacker.

[4242184] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 11:33 a.m.

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

Yes, but attacker gets a chance to defeat 2 flanks, so attackers whole army will fight at the courtyard and the defender will lose as the defender didnt finish any units of the attacker.

I personally would prefer to make sure to keep one flank when offline then to risk trying to hold two flanks because if they take two flanks they DON'T get an advantage where if they all three flanks they get the +30% bonus in courtyard

[4242189] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 11:45 a.m.

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

Yes, but attacker gets a chance to defeat 2 flanks, so attackers whole army will fight at the courtyard and the defender will lose as the defender didnt finish any units of the attacker.

I personally would prefer to make sure to keep one flank when offline then to risk trying to hold two flanks because if they take two flanks they DON'T get an advantage where if they all three flanks they get the +30% bonus in courtyard

If you defend 2 flanks, you will get a chance of destroying their units. If you defend 1 flank, the attacker will send his full army at these 2 flanks which have no army with courtyard bonus, and it will fight at the courtyard which will finish off your defenders.

EDIT : 100/0/0 is the best when you dont have maximum level towers.

[4242202] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 12:03 p.m.

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

Yes, but attacker gets a chance to defeat 2 flanks, so attackers whole army will fight at the courtyard and the defender will lose as the defender didnt finish any units of the attacker.

I personally would prefer to make sure to keep one flank when offline then to risk trying to hold two flanks because if they take two flanks they DON'T get an advantage where if they all three flanks they get the +30% bonus in courtyard

If you defend 2 flanks, you will get a chance of destroying their units. If you defend 1 flank, the attacker will send his full army at these 2 flanks which have no army with courtyard bonus, and it will fight at the courtyard which will finish off your defenders.

EDIT : 100/0/0 is the best when you dont have maximum level towers.

How would they destroy my troops if they don't hit the flank with most troops, those troops will be in my courtyard 50-0-50 is good for a lot of attacks but it isn't ideal for an offline set-up as they are a max no. of troops that can be on your wall e.g I can hold 200 on my wall if I do 100-0-0 all those troops will be in the left flank, if I do 50-0-50 one hundred will be in each flank. By the way you forgot about ratio in you blog.

[4242209] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 12:10 p.m.

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Devtking (IN1) said:

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Isn't 100-0-0/0-0-100 the offline set-up?

No, it was always 50/0/50

I also have another settings for defence 

33/34/33 I don't know if it helps to defend, I never used it.

100-0-0 is better for offline as you hold one flank normally so the attackers won't get +30% strength in keep. 33/34/33 is pretty bad as the attacker will normally beat all 3 walls, getting a +30% strength in keep.

Yes, but attacker gets a chance to defeat 2 flanks, so attackers whole army will fight at the courtyard and the defender will lose as the defender didnt finish any units of the attacker.

I personally would prefer to make sure to keep one flank when offline then to risk trying to hold two flanks because if they take two flanks they DON'T get an advantage where if they all three flanks they get the +30% bonus in courtyard

If you defend 2 flanks, you will get a chance of destroying their units. If you defend 1 flank, the attacker will send his full army at these 2 flanks which have no army with courtyard bonus, and it will fight at the courtyard which will finish off your defenders.

EDIT : 100/0/0 is the best when you dont have maximum level towers.

How would they destroy my troops if they don't hit the flank with most troops, those troops will be in my courtyard 50-0-50 is good for a lot of attacks but it isn't ideal for an offline set-up as they are a max no. of troops that can be on your wall e.g I can hold 200 on my wall if I do 100-0-0 all those troops will be in the left flank, if I do 50-0-50 one hundred will be in each flank. By the way you forgot about ratio in you blog.

Hmm, whatever helps you. I will post about ratio

[4242638] bobjoerock (US1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 10:11 p.m.

the problem is that when you only have 50% troops of one flank, it can be very easy to lose that flank so yes against medium attacks but against large  ruby attack you going to get destroyed. 

[4242639] bobjoerock (US1) [None] :: Dec. 31, 2015, 10:12 p.m.

the problem is that when you only have 50% troops of one flank, it can be very easy to lose that flank so yes against medium attacks but against large  ruby attack you going to get destroyed. 

[4242866] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Jan. 1, 2016, 6:48 a.m.

bobjoerock (US1) said:

the problem is that when you only have 50% troops of one flank, it can be very easy to lose that flank so yes against medium attacks but against large  ruby attack you going to get destroyed. 

Yes, if you have maximum level towers, you can have a chance of winning those flanks.

[4242883] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 1, 2016, 7:58 a.m.

Devtking (IN1) said:

bobjoerock (US1) said:

the problem is that when you only have 50% troops of one flank, it can be very easy to lose that flank so yes against medium attacks but against large  ruby attack you going to get destroyed. 

Yes, if you have maximum level towers, you can have a chance of winning those flanks.

With lv5 walls + lv5 towers you can only hold 320 without cast effects, meaning 50-0-50 setup is 160 troops on both flanks.
 Against a player who knows what they're doing and planned out their attack properly, you would lose.

[4242958] darkmaster (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 1, 2016, 11:15 a.m.

Also two-handed swordsman/heavy crossbowman are not the best attack troops. There are horrors, demon slayers etc. Also some non ruby troops that are better are vet macemen/vet crossbowman

[4243321] Devtking (IN1) [None] :: Jan. 1, 2016, 6:31 p.m.

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Also two-handed swordsman/heavy crossbowman are not the best attack troops. There are horrors, demon slayers etc. Also some non ruby troops that are better are vet macemen/vet crossbowman

darkmaster (GB1) said:

Also two-handed swordsman/heavy crossbowman are not the best attack troops. There are horrors, demon slayers etc. Also some non ruby troops that are better are vet macemen/vet crossbowman

That's for basic people only, I didnt mention special units did I?

[4245369] vampire empire (GB1) [None] :: Jan. 4, 2016, 2:28 a.m.

vets ain't special units tho. and horrors ain't that premium units as you can get them in the fire village using glasses.