English Standard Version The Seventh Seal and the Golden Censer 1When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. 2Then I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and seven trumpets were given to them. 3And another angel came and stood at the altar with a golden censer, and he was given much incense to offer with the prayers of all the saints on the golden altar before the throne, 4and the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, rose before God from the hand of the angel. 5Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings,a flashes of lightning, and an earthquake. The Seven Trumpets 6Now the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared to blow them. 7The first angel blew his trumpet, and there followed hail and fire, mixed with blood, and these were thrown upon the earth. And a third of the earth was burned up, and a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up. 8The second angel blew his trumpet, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood. 9A third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed. 10The third angel blew his trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, blazing like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. 11The name of the star is Wormwood.b A third of the waters became wormwood, and many people died from the water, because it had been made bitter. 12The fourth angel blew his trumpet, and a third of the sun was struck, and a third of the moon, and a third of the stars, so that a third of their light might be darkened, and a third of the day might be kept from shining, and likewise a third of the night. 13Then I looked, and I heard an eagle crying with a loud voice as it flew directly overhead, “Woe, woe, woe to those who dwell on the earth, at the blasts of the other trumpets that the three angels are about to blow!” |
Pineapple Joe (US1) said:Would you like to back that up with any actual facts? That is utterly absurd.LightSwayer (US1) said:Well I used to think...
Maybe MISC would win with the help of Dream Team
Until they decided to surrender when they (undirectly) started the war
Sure
Secondary Information(might be a little un accurate)
So basically what I heard was that DT and KON weren't really the best of friends and when DT got too close too MISC Serry- as any leader- separated from MISC and I don't know the rest......
Yes my INFO is little and might be un accurate, so please feel free to explain if you wish
Heartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
Who are you talking to me or Cormyria
LightSwayer (US1) said:Pineapple Joe (US1) said:Would you like to back that up with any actual facts? That is utterly absurd.LightSwayer (US1) said:Well I used to think...
Maybe MISC would win with the help of Dream Team
Until they decided to surrender when they (undirectly) started the war
Sure
Secondary Information(might be a little un accurate)
So basically what I heard was that DT and KON weren't really the best of friends and when DT got too close too MISC Serry- as any leader- separated from MISC and I don't know the rest......
Yes my INFO is little and might be un accurate, so please feel free to explain if you wish
That doesn't back anything up. You started the post with (Might be a little inaccurate) and "What I heard"
If you make a claim, back it up with evidence you know to be true. Somebody can say that aliens are invading. Does not mean it is true.
Cormyria (US1) said:all i was trying to say to light here is that he was free to choose his own path and maintain his own loyaltiesLightSwayer (US1) said:Heartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
Who are you talking to me or Cormyria
in order to demonstrate procedure I.E. all "Rebels" in my little "alliance" are volunteers and not conscripted so they are free to come and go as they see fit and i do not attempt to hold sway over their destiny via coercion or force of arms "in game " or on FORUM ...... now as per the ROE .... and with MY APOLOGIES .....
MY point is that this thread is "irrelevant" as NEPH will NEVER "end" due to the fact that you cannot ever "take out" a player castle here so any "resistance" to NEPH cannot hope to oppose them much less "end" them by "taking out" NEPH under ANY kind of "REAL TIME" combat ROE so it is therefor important to declare a relevant ROE and establish negotiations for all involved parties under selfsame wartime ROE and to do it on FORUM so that the "rebels" and the READERS could see how this is done with "large families " like NEPH in order to create a public example of said procedure under selfsame wartime ROE for the record and submitted for public review and analysis in my opinion ...... even if it means i need to burn for awhile to prove my point ( and reduce "collateral damages" in the interest of sanity and public safety )..... "There is no reason to go to war unless you are trying to create peace " ....... Cormyria aka FENRIR aka "Skeeter"
I can't say this enough times. Nobody understands what your posts mean. I have to read it over and over before I even have an idea what you are talking about.
Slow down, don't use the caps over and over. Use proper punctuation. Maybe try going back to 6th grade English?
It would help if we can understand what you say, that way we know whether to agree or not.
No I'm not leaving. Just letting you guys have your threadCormyria (US1) said:what you aren't leaving NOW ?? are you? ? GK ??? we need to convince you to join us and help us "take out" KON LOLManatee (US1) said:Editing out my reply from earlier. Came out harsh when I didn't mean it that way, lol.
Have fun with this thread guys!
ps i APOLOGIZE for not bothering to PM you in game with my pleas and "warnings" as i was to busy dealing with my own mailbox and answering all the "warnings" i was getting ... every hour or so ... from KON wannabes thinking they are going to "warn" me off my course so once more I APOLOGIZE for not attempting to bother you in game ....
Can't let KoN have all the fun...Heartnoir (US1) said:Seriously I have no idea what you just said. However, the fact is that we don't even have your alliance painted red. What is YOUR point???Cormyria (US1) said:yup that's right you got me good pilgrim ... i am done fer now just cause i tried to make a pointHeartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
i NEVER ADVOCATED ANYTHING i just inferred referrence (with the help of "Skeeter" and some nice flash pics of early cold war ATOMIC TESTS on BIMINI ATOLL ) as to the ULTIMATE COST of WAR in the finality of ESCALATION .... thank you for illustrating this in your efforts to undermine me here . YOU ARE getting closer so keep up the fight ....please be advised WE are NOT attacking anyone in game outside of ROE by declaration of selfsame wartime ROE ... I am being attacked in game CONSTANTLY just for posting my OPINIONS here ( just like i was hoping KON would do FYI as per MY ROE ).... I wonder why that is ? I wonder .....please keep in mind that as per manatee's VERY CREATIVE suggestions i have decided to use "trained sugar gliders" as the "delivery system" for my so called "strategic airstrike offensive" so this is a discussion about "hypothetical consequences" and for some reason a "hypothetical discussion " has ESCALATED into a "real time " in game combat situation and at this time KON has still not declared ROE or issued their demands ( effectively the arguable equivalent of a nuclear detonation to the alleged image of professionalism KON so desperately tries to maintain in terms of the "PR SHOCK WAVE" that you are no doubt already even now beginning to experience first hand ).... now would you like to STATE YOUR DEMANDS under selfsame wartime ROE ? or should we just keep debating "rhetoric" and "semantics" and all of the relevant applications of the previously mentioned rhetoric (and semantic discourse ) as used in a "spin control" campaign ???? FYI i AM not glorifying Che Guevara I AM simply quoting him to illustrate a point , it is not like i have a megaphone and a molotov here , i have a keyboard and WIKI OL and the ability to imbed gif's thanks to MANATEE and his "challenge" to produce "sugar gliders" en masse in the hopes of proving a point to me so i did just that in the hopes of proving a point to him ipso facto ergo; i guess what it all boils down to now is WHAT is your POINT ????

Oh yeah don't waste your coins...

Had just about enough of this bugger on the forums, now I know what it's like to those against me in the past.
Well, there is about 4,500 years of war history that disagrees with that quote, lol.Cormyria (US1) said:so does that mean you are ready to "join the resistance " and help us "debate our way to FREEDOM" yet ??? lol? "There is no reason to go to war unless you are trying to create peace " ....... Cormyria ....
And no, I'm not interested in debating freedom, or resisting anything. I'm interested in playing GGE, a game about empires and fighting, and a little bit of farmville elements on the side
Cormyria (US1) said:WAR? you say? do you have demands under WARTIME ROE ?GodsNobleman (US1) said:Can't let KoN have all the fun...Heartnoir (US1) said:Seriously I have no idea what you just said. However, the fact is that we don't even have your alliance painted red. What is YOUR point???Cormyria (US1) said:yup that's right you got me good pilgrim ... i am done fer now just cause i tried to make a pointHeartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
i NEVER ADVOCATED ANYTHING i just inferred referrence (with the help of "Skeeter" and some nice flash pics of early cold war ATOMIC TESTS on BIMINI ATOLL ) as to the ULTIMATE COST of WAR in the finality of ESCALATION .... thank you for illustrating this in your efforts to undermine me here . YOU ARE getting closer so keep up the fight ....please be advised WE are NOT attacking anyone in game outside of ROE by declaration of selfsame wartime ROE ... I am being attacked in game CONSTANTLY just for posting my OPINIONS here ( just like i was hoping KON would do FYI as per MY ROE ).... I wonder why that is ? I wonder .....please keep in mind that as per manatee's VERY CREATIVE suggestions i have decided to use "trained sugar gliders" as the "delivery system" for my so called "strategic airstrike offensive" so this is a discussion about "hypothetical consequences" and for some reason a "hypothetical discussion " has ESCALATED into a "real time " in game combat situation and at this time KON has still not declared ROE or issued their demands ( effectively the arguable equivalent of a nuclear detonation to the alleged image of professionalism KON so desperately tries to maintain in terms of the "PR SHOCK WAVE" that you are no doubt already even now beginning to experience first hand ).... now would you like to STATE YOUR DEMANDS under selfsame wartime ROE ? or should we just keep debating "rhetoric" and "semantics" and all of the relevant applications of the previously mentioned rhetoric (and semantic discourse ) as used in a "spin control" campaign ???? FYI i AM not glorifying Che Guevara I AM simply quoting him to illustrate a point , it is not like i have a megaphone and a molotov here , i have a keyboard and WIKI OL and the ability to imbed gif's thanks to MANATEE and his "challenge" to produce "sugar gliders" en masse in the hopes of proving a point to me so i did just that in the hopes of proving a point to him ipso facto ergo; i guess what it all boils down to now is WHAT is your POINT ????
Oh yeah don't waste your coins...
Had just about enough of this bugger on the forums, now I know what it's like to those against me in the past.
or are you just in the habit of declaring WAR for no reason
in short WHAT IS YOUR OBJECTIVE under your ROE ???
thank you for helping me illustrate ALL my points here by the way ...
My objective:
-Help you get over your stubbornness
-I have nothing better to do, my inner grandparent is coming out
-Bump up my looting rank
Happy now, buddy??
DarkAwesomeman1 (US1) said:Even if you guys don't like what cormyria is saying you shouldn't be totally dening him for stating his opinion. Why this thread is even on here im not sure (since the fourm was made to keep people updated and for people who have questions) But still ifyou don't like what cormyria is saying you could at least ask him why hes doing it. not just go ballistic for him stating HIS personal opinion. Which you can disagree to.
He can state his opinion as many times as he wants. It's a forum, that's what your supposed to do. Nobody in here is telling him he can't. I've never said I didn't like what he said, it's just that I couldn't understand what he said. That is due to overuse of capitals, punctuation, faces, etc...
Cormyria (US1) said:not quite yetGodsNobleman (US1) said:Cormyria (US1) said:WAR? you say? do you have demands under WARTIME ROE ?GodsNobleman (US1) said:Can't let KoN have all the fun...Heartnoir (US1) said:Seriously I have no idea what you just said. However, the fact is that we don't even have your alliance painted red. What is YOUR point???Cormyria (US1) said:yup that's right you got me good pilgrim ... i am done fer now just cause i tried to make a pointHeartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
i NEVER ADVOCATED ANYTHING i just inferred referrence (with the help of "Skeeter" and some nice flash pics of early cold war ATOMIC TESTS on BIMINI ATOLL ) as to the ULTIMATE COST of WAR in the finality of ESCALATION .... thank you for illustrating this in your efforts to undermine me here . YOU ARE getting closer so keep up the fight ....please be advised WE are NOT attacking anyone in game outside of ROE by declaration of selfsame wartime ROE ... I am being attacked in game CONSTANTLY just for posting my OPINIONS here ( just like i was hoping KON would do FYI as per MY ROE ).... I wonder why that is ? I wonder .....please keep in mind that as per manatee's VERY CREATIVE suggestions i have decided to use "trained sugar gliders" as the "delivery system" for my so called "strategic airstrike offensive" so this is a discussion about "hypothetical consequences" and for some reason a "hypothetical discussion " has ESCALATED into a "real time " in game combat situation and at this time KON has still not declared ROE or issued their demands ( effectively the arguable equivalent of a nuclear detonation to the alleged image of professionalism KON so desperately tries to maintain in terms of the "PR SHOCK WAVE" that you are no doubt already even now beginning to experience first hand ).... now would you like to STATE YOUR DEMANDS under selfsame wartime ROE ? or should we just keep debating "rhetoric" and "semantics" and all of the relevant applications of the previously mentioned rhetoric (and semantic discourse ) as used in a "spin control" campaign ???? FYI i AM not glorifying Che Guevara I AM simply quoting him to illustrate a point , it is not like i have a megaphone and a molotov here , i have a keyboard and WIKI OL and the ability to imbed gif's thanks to MANATEE and his "challenge" to produce "sugar gliders" en masse in the hopes of proving a point to me so i did just that in the hopes of proving a point to him ipso facto ergo; i guess what it all boils down to now is WHAT is your POINT ????
Oh yeah don't waste your coins...
Had just about enough of this bugger on the forums, now I know what it's like to those against me in the past.
or are you just in the habit of declaring WAR for no reason
in short WHAT IS YOUR OBJECTIVE under your ROE ???
thank you for helping me illustrate ALL my points here by the way ...
My objective:
-Help you get over your stubbornness
-I have nothing better to do, my inner grandparent is coming out
-Bump up my looting rank
Happy now, buddy??
now that you have stated your demands and your force of arms are arguably superior to my own we will begin the "peace talks" as MY only choice is capitulation under WARTIME ROE so as soon as you are willing to be more realistic and define EXACTLY what you want me to do to "enforce" your will here i would like you to please define your ROE ....please keep in mind that YOU choose to make an "example" out of me ( i saved your letter and i am prepared to copy paste it to this thread in order to further illustrate my point if needed) so that is PRECISELY what we are going to do here and now we will use me as an "example" of how new players and old players alike should conduct themselves under WARTIME ROE and we will discuss it on this thread until conflict resolution is achieved and we can all have LASTING PEACE .... thank you for your cooperation in this matter i could not have done this without you ... seriously i OWE you BIG TIME for this ... lol ...or do you truly intend to "use me as a farm" as you so eloquently stated it in the letter you sent me in response to my inquiry about your demands under your wartime ROE .... please keep in mind that ROE violations in WARTIME are defined as "WAR CRIMES" under the GENEVA CONVENTIONS pursuant to the LAWS OF ARMED CONFLICT in a war zone ....What you said in your letter sounds like a threat to me ?
would you like to try again or should i "copy paste " your letter as your official stance in this matter? be advised you are past the point of no return here because YOU posted this "declaration of WAR" on a VERY popular forum thread .....oh look at that SOME ONE finally took the bait and walked into my carefully laid trap (yay strategy!!) i couldn't have asked for a more eloquent response "truth is ALWAYS stranger than fiction and the truth always comes out in the light of the blood moon " FENRIR ...
![]()
we are NOW in the "endgame" of this "resistance" and will now commence "negotiations " for peace talks if you will and soon we will have the right to exist here and NOT be KON .... this is almost over i hope Welcome to the new world .....![]()
XtraXtraXTRa ...SPECIAL THANKS TO ;
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPSTHE BASIC SCHOOLMARINE CORPS TRAINING COMMANDCAMP BARRETT, VIRGINIA 22134-5019LAW OF WAR/INTRODUCTION TO RULESOF ENGAGEMENTB130936STUDENT HANDOUTB130936 Law of War/Introduction to Rules of Engagement2 Basic Officer CourseLaw of War/Introduction to Rules of EngagementIntroduction The Law of War is defined as that part of international lawthat governs the conduct of armed hostilities. Included inthis lesson are the principles underlying the Law of War, aswell as classification of persons that may be found on thebattlefield. The Law of War is often referred to as the law ofarmed conflict (LOAC). The two terms are interchangeable.The Rules of Engagement (ROE) are those directives thatdelineate the circumstances and limitations under whichUnited States (US) forces will initiate and/or continuecombat engagement.Importance; The importance of understanding the Law of War in thecurrent operational environment cannot be overstressed.All we need to do is look at one of the several cases wherequestionable actions have been publicly showcased tounderstand its importance. It is imperative that we asleaders not only know what the Law of War is, but we alsohave the ability to conceptualize these principles and trainour Marines to the same standards. Semper Fi .... Do or Die ...
It took a couple times reading it...but I have an idea. I think?
What does ROE stand for? Rules of? I don't know, but you say it a lot. So I'm curious.
And in what part did they "Fall into your trap"? All you have gained is multiple alliance's declaring war on you. I wouldn't call that a win. But hey, if you think a castle that's on fire is a win. Then great job to you.
What do you mean "Have the right to exist here and not be KoN"? From how you stated that, you are saying we are close to being able to be on this forum with ought liking or being allied to KoN. When in reality that is not true.
Again, I didn't understand what exactly you were saying, so if my claim was inaccurate, please point it out.
Cormyria (US1) said:some one here just declared war on me (and posted his declaration on this thread and sent attacks to my assets in game ) because he took offense to my stated opinions here ... when do ROE violations cross the line into TOS violations i wonder ? when does censorship cross the line and become "oppressive" ? what can one player hope to do in the face of naked aggression and overwhelming odds so some one can make an "example" out of me ? as this story ESCALATES and we continue to reiterate the necessity of established and well defined ROE ......xXDeathExistsXx (US1) said:DarkAwesomeman1 (US1) said:Even if you guys don't like what cormyria is saying you shouldn't be totally dening him for stating his opinion. Why this thread is even on here im not sure (since the fourm was made to keep people updated and for people who have questions) But still ifyou don't like what cormyria is saying you could at least ask him why hes doing it. not just go ballistic for him stating HIS personal opinion. Which you can disagree to.
He can state his opinion as many times as he wants. It's a forum, that's what your supposed to do. Nobody in here is telling him he can't. I've never said I didn't like what he said, it's just that I couldn't understand what he said. That is due to overuse of capitals, punctuation, faces, etc...
What is exactly your ROE or TOS? And there is a difference from people declaring war on you because they don't agree, then people declaring because they took offense.
People can declare on you for what ever reason. I can attack you because your username starts with a C, and that's a reason. It's a war game, people will start wars for the heck of it.
However, nobody has yet to say "Cormyria, your opinion sucks, get off the forums." And if somebody says that, then you have the right to tell them to shut up. Forums are a place to express your opinions through words.
Cormyria (US1) said:don't you see it yet ?xXDeathExistsXx (US1) said:Cormyria (US1) said:not quite yetGodsNobleman (US1) said:Cormyria (US1) said:WAR? you say? do you have demands under WARTIME ROE ?GodsNobleman (US1) said:Can't let KoN have all the fun...Heartnoir (US1) said:Seriously I have no idea what you just said. However, the fact is that we don't even have your alliance painted red. What is YOUR point???Cormyria (US1) said:yup that's right you got me good pilgrim ... i am done fer now just cause i tried to make a pointHeartnoir (US1) said:By all means let's glorify a man who advocated the use of atomic warfare as a means of achieving socialist liberation. By the way, your heroic "freedom fighter" opposed freedom of speech, religion, press, assembly and protest; mounted a campaign to have homosexuals jailed and supported the repression of rock 'n roll in Cuba.Cormyria (US1) said:ok so thanks for the help? i guess ? it was fun til it wasn't right? ? ?LightSwayer (US1) said:Yes I was going to help cormyria take down KON but I found too many "issues" with his plan, Therefore, I backed up the plan and joined TNP Gathering
but hey "What is the point of being a FREEDOM FIGHTER if you can't live FREE " ... Che Guevara .... and any other FREEDOM FIGHTER you may or may not have known like EVER .....
“To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary … These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution!” - Che
i NEVER ADVOCATED ANYTHING i just inferred referrence (with the help of "Skeeter" and some nice flash pics of early cold war ATOMIC TESTS on BIMINI ATOLL ) as to the ULTIMATE COST of WAR in the finality of ESCALATION .... thank you for illustrating this in your efforts to undermine me here . YOU ARE getting closer so keep up the fight ....please be advised WE are NOT attacking anyone in game outside of ROE by declaration of selfsame wartime ROE ... I am being attacked in game CONSTANTLY just for posting my OPINIONS here ( just like i was hoping KON would do FYI as per MY ROE ).... I wonder why that is ? I wonder .....please keep in mind that as per manatee's VERY CREATIVE suggestions i have decided to use "trained sugar gliders" as the "delivery system" for my so called "strategic airstrike offensive" so this is a discussion about "hypothetical consequences" and for some reason a "hypothetical discussion " has ESCALATED into a "real time " in game combat situation and at this time KON has still not declared ROE or issued their demands ( effectively the arguable equivalent of a nuclear detonation to the alleged image of professionalism KON so desperately tries to maintain in terms of the "PR SHOCK WAVE" that you are no doubt already even now beginning to experience first hand ).... now would you like to STATE YOUR DEMANDS under selfsame wartime ROE ? or should we just keep debating "rhetoric" and "semantics" and all of the relevant applications of the previously mentioned rhetoric (and semantic discourse ) as used in a "spin control" campaign ???? FYI i AM not glorifying Che Guevara I AM simply quoting him to illustrate a point , it is not like i have a megaphone and a molotov here , i have a keyboard and WIKI OL and the ability to imbed gif's thanks to MANATEE and his "challenge" to produce "sugar gliders" en masse in the hopes of proving a point to me so i did just that in the hopes of proving a point to him ipso facto ergo; i guess what it all boils down to now is WHAT is your POINT ????
Oh yeah don't waste your coins...
Had just about enough of this bugger on the forums, now I know what it's like to those against me in the past.
or are you just in the habit of declaring WAR for no reason
in short WHAT IS YOUR OBJECTIVE under your ROE ???
thank you for helping me illustrate ALL my points here by the way ...
My objective:
-Help you get over your stubbornness
-I have nothing better to do, my inner grandparent is coming out
-Bump up my looting rank
Happy now, buddy??
now that you have stated your demands and your force of arms are arguably superior to my own we will begin the "peace talks" as MY only choice is capitulation under WARTIME ROE so as soon as you are willing to be more realistic and define EXACTLY what you want me to do to "enforce" your will here i would like you to please define your ROE ....please keep in mind that YOU choose to make an "example" out of me ( i saved your letter and i am prepared to copy paste it to this thread in order to further illustrate my point if needed) so that is PRECISELY what we are going to do here and now we will use me as an "example" of how new players and old players alike should conduct themselves under WARTIME ROE and we will discuss it on this thread until conflict resolution is achieved and we can all have LASTING PEACE .... thank you for your cooperation in this matter i could not have done this without you ... seriously i OWE you BIG TIME for this ... lol ...or do you truly intend to "use me as a farm" as you so eloquently stated it in the letter you sent me in response to my inquiry about your demands under your wartime ROE .... please keep in mind that ROE violations in WARTIME are defined as "WAR CRIMES" under the GENEVA CONVENTIONS pursuant to the LAWS OF ARMED CONFLICT in a war zone ....What you said in your letter sounds like a threat to me ?
would you like to try again or should i "copy paste " your letter as your official stance in this matter? be advised you are past the point of no return here because YOU posted this "declaration of WAR" on a VERY popular forum thread .....oh look at that SOME ONE finally took the bait and walked into my carefully laid trap (yay strategy!!) i couldn't have asked for a more eloquent response "truth is ALWAYS stranger than fiction and the truth always comes out in the light of the blood moon " FENRIR ...
![]()
we are NOW in the "endgame" of this "resistance" and will now commence "negotiations " for peace talks if you will and soon we will have the right to exist here and NOT be KON .... this is almost over i hope Welcome to the new world .....![]()
XtraXtraXTRa ...SPECIAL THANKS TO ;
UNITED STATES MARINE CORPSTHE BASIC SCHOOLMARINE CORPS TRAINING COMMANDCAMP BARRETT, VIRGINIA 22134-5019LAW OF WAR/INTRODUCTION TO RULESOF ENGAGEMENTB130936STUDENT HANDOUTB130936 Law of War/Introduction to Rules of Engagement2 Basic Officer CourseLaw of War/Introduction to Rules of EngagementIntroduction The Law of War is defined as that part of international lawthat governs the conduct of armed hostilities. Included inthis lesson are the principles underlying the Law of War, aswell as classification of persons that may be found on thebattlefield. The Law of War is often referred to as the law ofarmed conflict (LOAC). The two terms are interchangeable.The Rules of Engagement (ROE) are those directives thatdelineate the circumstances and limitations under whichUnited States (US) forces will initiate and/or continuecombat engagement.Importance; The importance of understanding the Law of War in thecurrent operational environment cannot be overstressed.All we need to do is look at one of the several cases wherequestionable actions have been publicly showcased tounderstand its importance. It is imperative that we asleaders not only know what the Law of War is, but we alsohave the ability to conceptualize these principles and trainour Marines to the same standards. Semper Fi .... Do or Die ...
English Standard VersionThe Seventh Seal and the Golden Censer
1When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. 2Then I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and seven trumpets were given to them. 3And another angel came and stood at the altar with a golden censer, and he was given much incense to offer with the prayers of all the saints on the golden altar before the throne, 4and the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, rose before God from the hand of the angel. 5Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings,a flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.
The Seven Trumpets
6Now the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared to blow them.
7The first angel blew his trumpet, and there followed hail and fire, mixed with blood, and these were thrown upon the earth. And a third of the earth was burned up, and a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.
8The second angel blew his trumpet, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood. 9A third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.
10The third angel blew his trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, blazing like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. 11The name of the star is Wormwood.b A third of the waters became wormwood, and many people died from the water, because it had been made bitter.
12The fourth angel blew his trumpet, and a third of the sun was struck, and a third of the moon, and a third of the stars, so that a third of their light might be darkened, and a third of the day might be kept from shining, and likewise a third of the night.
13Then I looked, and I heard an eagle crying with a loud voice as it flew directly overhead, “Woe, woe, woe to those who dwell on the earth, at the blasts of the other trumpets that the three angels are about to blow!”
It took a couple times reading it...but I have an idea. I think?
What does ROE stand for? Rules of? I don't know, but you say it a lot. So I'm curious.![]()
And in what part did they "Fall into your trap"? All you have gained is multiple alliance's declaring war on you. I wouldn't call that a win. But hey, if you think a castle that's on fire is a win. Then great job to you.
What do you mean "Have the right to exist here and not be KoN"? From how you stated that, you are saying we are close to being able to be on this forum with ought liking or being allied to KoN. When in reality that is not true.
Again, I didn't understand what exactly you were saying, so if my claim was inaccurate, please point it out.![]()
i needed someone from or Klaiming to be KON to declare war on me and post the declaration here
so we could have an example for discussion to whit" Warhammer 40k vs . me the more KON declares on me at this point the more they are kicking a dead horse to prove what ? dominance? superiority? censorship? irrelevant to the discussion at hand IE what is the procedure for WAR here with KON under wartime ROE ???? We needed an example in order to commence negotiations and achieve a lasting peace here for all parties involved
otherwise we are only debating hypothetical scenarios and semantics mixed with recycled rhetoric ....
I guess that would depend on how you look at things. I get where you are coming from, but the people attacking you may be thinking something else.
You say stuff they don't agree with, how do they get you to stop? They can't lash out on the forums, so they do so in game. It's not to prove they are better, or that KoN is better. It's to try to get the person that disagrees to stop.
Maybe that is not true for some of these people. I'm not them so I can't be for sure.
ccknoeppel (US1) said:I like hashbrowns.
Dude same
YepCormyria (US1) said:i feel that quotes really help establish relevance in what is essentially a semantic debate .....Cormyria (US1) said:This THREAD has always been irrelevant !!! ipso facto ergo do you have reasonable demands under ROE that will bring us to conflict resolution here ? or do you just want to Komplain about Cormyria like every other KON does ? do i KARE what you want KON unless it resolves this conflict ? what do you WANT KON to make this end ? be REALISTIC now and remember THIS IS WAR and WAR is not ALWAYS easy .... I APOLOGIZE but this is the way it is and the way it shall be here and now until the WAR is OVER get it now ? ... welcome to the new world please figure it out now ....WillaDean2 (US1) said:This thread has become more of an irritant and has become too laborious to even read. It is my opinion that GGE thought the new forum was not being utilized, so Cormyria was brought in to irritate the older forum spammers into action. He/She has done the job quite nicely. As for me, I cannot read anymore nonsense here, so unless less the prose and essays stop and legitimate forum information is briefly made, I will no longer read this.....(no word fits)...stuff.If you don't want to be productive here .. How about you make good on all your threats/warnings? than please and do just that ...
", I cannot read anymore nonsense here," take your own advice if my words concern you so and you do not know what you need to do to end this WAR ?.... at least you are willing to acknowledge that i am accomplishing my objectives here most eloquently if i do say so my self .... Since you like quotes Cormyria, here is one:Ecclesiastes 1:9New International Version (NIV)
9 What has been will be again,
what has been done will be done again;
there is nothing new under the sun.next stop?
revelations ....
English Standard VersionThe Seventh Seal and the Golden Censer
1When the Lamb opened the seventh seal, there was silence in heaven for about half an hour. 2Then I saw the seven angels who stand before God, and seven trumpets were given to them. 3And another angel came and stood at the altar with a golden censer, and he was given much incense to offer with the prayers of all the saints on the golden altar before the throne, 4and the smoke of the incense, with the prayers of the saints, rose before God from the hand of the angel. 5Then the angel took the censer and filled it with fire from the altar and threw it on the earth, and there were peals of thunder, rumblings,a flashes of lightning, and an earthquake.
The Seven Trumpets
6Now the seven angels who had the seven trumpets prepared to blow them.
7The first angel blew his trumpet, and there followed hail and fire, mixed with blood, and these were thrown upon the earth. And a third of the earth was burned up, and a third of the trees were burned up, and all green grass was burned up.
8The second angel blew his trumpet, and something like a great mountain, burning with fire, was thrown into the sea, and a third of the sea became blood. 9A third of the living creatures in the sea died, and a third of the ships were destroyed.
10The third angel blew his trumpet, and a great star fell from heaven, blazing like a torch, and it fell on a third of the rivers and on the springs of water. 11The name of the star is Wormwood.b A third of the waters became wormwood, and many people died from the water, because it had been made bitter.
12The fourth angel blew his trumpet, and a third of the sun was struck, and a third of the moon, and a third of the stars, so that a third of their light might be darkened, and a third of the day might be kept from shining, and likewise a third of the night.
13Then I looked, and I heard an eagle crying with a loud voice as it flew directly overhead, “Woe, woe, woe to those who dwell on the earth, at the blasts of the other trumpets that the three angels are about to blow!”

