Heartnoir (US1) said:

ψ Sadness ψ (US1) said:


That right there is bullshit. The same thing happened to Morentz, where kon posted mannnnnny disturbing threads with real life pictures of him and his girlfriend, his phone number, skype, and other contact info encouraging others to harass him.

The above is patently untrue. Morentz/gf pic wasn't just "posted" nor were skype contact and certainly not phone number on the Forum. In explaining reasons for the start of the war, there were messages posted and those contained profile pics of the user's account. The intent was not to harass or insult, but to post a valid account of conversations that took place that had direct impact on the start of the war. Many many posts by MISC have been made that include KoN skype contact information so please stop attempting to twist events to suite your story line.

UltimateJhon (GB1) said:

outlaw_always (US1) said:

R.I.P. Thread. Not that it was ever useful or anything  

This'll get interesting

I'll be browsing the forums keeping one eye on this thread...

Lame ass meme, get on my level

UltimateJhon (GB1) said:

Firstly i read through allot of the recent posts so i am up to date, indeed. But i see allot of serious exaggeration in regards to GGS deleting threads, which i feel is justified in every route

This forum is their property not ours - They have the right to do what they want in every shape or form, you signed a TOS and agreed to that on day 1 so get of your high horse!

Secondly, how is it biased to delete a thread because of people crying over it? If a thread distresses someone so truly then who cares if they delete it, i would rather someones day not be ruined than a thread not be removed

Lastly, smh at you people who go out your way to stir and bandwagon hate on GGS for moderating their own forum. Nothing will be completely unbiased, ever. Thats life and if you earn money and spend it here, you should know there's never a fair system this big.

Coolking4716 (US1) said:

I do agree we need new mods, Temprance clearly has a bias towards alliances that will go unnamed, and we need more than one mod, I think Rosie or Stan should get rid of Temprance and hire 3 more mods, just my opinion.

-John

PizzaWarrior5 (US1) said:

@outlaw_always (US1)
Should be the new mod


If that doesnt work, @Heartnoir (US1)
Should be mod, Now let me wait and watch this be removed for moderation

Temprance said:

Coolking4716 (US1) said:

I do agree we need new mods, Temprance clearly has a bias towards alliances that will go unnamed, and we need more than one mod, I think Rosie or Stan should get rid of Temprance and hire 3 more mods, just my opinion.

-John

I agree

Temprance

Manatee (US1) said:

disgusting or disgraceful

Manatee (US1) said:

I don't want to be a moderator, it would mean I'd have to behave.

I may not be disgusting or disgraceful on here, but I do have my fun

NoPainNoGainFTW (US1) said:

I want to be mod.

VeeWeeZY (US1) said:

UltimateJhon (GB1) said:

Firstly i read through allot of the recent posts so i am up to date, indeed. But i see allot of serious exaggeration in regards to GGS deleting threads, which i feel is justified in every route

This forum is their property not ours - They have the right to do what they want in every shape or form, you signed a TOS and agreed to that on day 1 so get of your high horse!

Secondly, how is it biased to delete a thread because of people crying over it? If a thread distresses someone so truly then who cares if they delete it, i would rather someones day not be ruined than a thread not be removed

Lastly, smh at you people who go out your way to stir and bandwagon hate on GGS for moderating their own forum. Nothing will be completely unbiased, ever. Thats life and if you earn money and spend it here, you should know there's never a fair system this big.

If something is offending you dont read it.  Your subjective emotions cant be the rule of law.