Goodgame Studios forum archives ::

Topic: [321379] Why do big alliances take advantage of smaller ones?

[4595133] Maiden of the S (US1) (Banned) [None] :: Oct. 17, 2016, 10:20 a.m.

FarmingforDayz (US1) said:

Let me get this straight. Alliance A was getting beat up by alliance B owing to their smaller size. Alliance C steps in to beat up alliance B as a result of A's plea for help. Now alliance B is getting beat up by a bigger alliance because they aren't big enough to stop it. Makes sense.

Yay for double standards.

To be honest, I don't actually care. Allow me to rephrase: DT can beat up whoever they want without a reason in my opinion because that's just how this game works and it should have no ties to RL long term happiness anyway. I think it's funny that in this case, however, they chose a reason...and that reason is retaliation against bullying. Irony? I dunno. I used to know how to use that word.

Pardon the rambling.

Not really no. Alliance B stole an OP from alliance A and repeatedly hit alliance A and their leader wrote a nasty message to the player. Alliance C stepped in and hit the main perpetrators in Alliance B. The leader and the one who stole the OP.

[4595134] Maiden of the S (US1) (Banned) [None] :: Oct. 17, 2016, 10:21 a.m.

Deadly (US1) said:

Everyone who participated in getting this gentleman's outpost back should form a new league of alliances revolving around maintaining justice and avenging the wrongfully oppressed in GGE. You can even call it "The Justice League" and bring in other like-minded individuals who seek to play this game peacefully.

I would gladly return to GGE to help ensure that this righteous project succeeds, if there's a real effort to follow through with it. I see some great opportunities here.

You'd be the first person to have to take out, but luckily you've already quit

Multiple times. Sometimes the trash takes itself out!

[4595336] outlaw_always (US1) [US1] :: Oct. 17, 2016, 3:21 p.m.

Wow are we going to need a person C to take out this person A who is being mean to person B?

[4595355] president_ro (US1) [None] :: Oct. 17, 2016, 3:37 p.m.

She is mean yes

[4595651] K1LLER (US1) [US1] :: Oct. 17, 2016, 9:08 p.m.

Responding to an alliance hitting a smaller alliance than theirs by having an even bigger alliance or two coming in and hitting that first alliance lol fun. Stealing OPs is part of this game, I may have capped and occupied a few in my time :P RVs too
People gotta understand how the game is meant to be, Its been morphed over the years sadly to being you get to it first you have it forever. I think fighting for your property makes the game more fun.
Yeah you lose some but you win some in the end as well.
Don't complain, just deal with it.
I've been stripped of maybe 300 RVs in wars and early morning masses, it happens.

[4595776] Coolking4716 (US1) [None] :: Oct. 18, 2016, 12:25 a.m.

Notagoodplaya (US1) said:

Deadly (US1) said:

A mercenary alliance is fundamentally different, though. Such an alliance's operations are based solely on cost-benefit analysis.

I'm talking about a truly righteous league of allies who operate based on their own ideals.

"The Justice League" or the "League of Justice" are both suitable names. These fine folks here didn't gain anything from helping this person redeem his rightful property. They did it out of the goodness of their hearts, and I think more players should follow suit to ensure that no one person's rights are violated just because they are more vulnerable.

League of Justice sounds better. This sounds pretty cool, It really sounds like they are actual super heroes, I guess you can call it a Super Alliance?

Who are you? I seen you in the Forums for a long time but everytime I try to search you up, you never show up. I try to make sure I spell your name right but its pretty basic. Dead-ly,

NGP

lol, collective 2.0, I wanna watch this

« first previous Page 2 of 2.