Forum: empire-en

Board: [584] Players ask Players

Topic: [76454] Defense, 1000+ vers 800 lost???

[1384739] joe96 [None] :: Sept. 3, 2012, 7:17 a.m.

should do 0-65-35, you would kill all soldiers on gate if they only have 1 or 2 waves of tools ( its counts on what tools you both using) but seeing that you use normal tools you should only do this when a normal attacker attacking you. if rubie attacker and two waves of tools, then with 50-0-50 you may win on flanks unless they using it on 3 waves, then you should use 0-0-100 but with 0% you could lose 500-600 soldiers at keep counting on what soldiers they using and if they use armor tools on all 4 waves and you using normal tools with 0-0-100, you have a great change of losing unless you have about 2100 defence soldiers there.

[1384741] MaJeStiic [None] :: Sept. 3, 2012, 7:38 a.m.

joe96 wrote: »

should do 0-65-35, you would kill all soldiers on gate if they only have 1 or 2 waves of tools ( its counts on what tools you both using) but seeing that you use normal tools you should only do this when a normal attacker attacking you. if rubie attacker and two waves of tools, then with 50-0-50 you may win on flanks unless they using it on 3 waves, then you should use 0-0-100 but with 0% you could lose 500-600 soldiers at keep counting on what soldiers they using and if they use armor tools on all 4 waves and you using normal tools with 0-0-100, you have a great change of losing unless you have about 2100 defence soldiers there.

0-65-35 is a horrible idea. I don't really understand anything past the numbers you just put. But he needs to put more tools on the walls is what he needs to do. The % doesn't matter with only 3 tools which didn't even cover the first wave of attacks. 0-0-100 would have been your best bet here because then you would have had a SMALL chance at least of alleviating the 30% bonus for the attacker.

[1386088] Eric768 (US1) [US1] :: Sept. 5, 2012, 3:11 a.m.

Ok, I may be slightly confused here, but the overview shows that many troops (193) in total and the second wave of attacks shows no defenders on the walls at all.

Either I'm being really stupid as I haven't had my coffee yet or there's something a wrong with this report.

Yeah, sorry to say Baldrick, but it looks like you havent had your coffee. In the first wave the attackers killed all the defenders, therefore they weren't carried over to the second wave. I was slightly confused with it until I noticed that.

[1386244] Baldrick (GB1) [None] :: Sept. 5, 2012, 11:39 a.m.

Hmmm, there's still something fishy about this.