Forum: empire-en

Board: [587] Alliance introductions & searches

Topic: [115857] Decent Alliances??

[1931952] heehee3 [None] :: Feb. 7, 2015, 9:37 p.m.

Hyris V wrote: »

Me and heehee didnt get on well but Pugs are a v good choice imo and others

We are allies now! Let me send you some resources!

[1931982] Monkey17179 (GB1) [None] :: Feb. 7, 2015, 10:10 p.m.

heehee3 wrote: »

We are allies now! Let me send you some resources!

What a nice way to become friends

[1944586] Legendary Fire [None] :: March 1, 2015, 8:26 a.m.

tdn iho musks is a good alliance

[1945709] Monkey17179 (GB1) [None] :: March 3, 2015, 6:55 a.m.

Legendary Fire wrote: »

tdn iho musks is a good alliance

They stole my rvs when i was out of my alliance for 5 hours Great Alliance would have asked

[1945807] Conan (GB1) [None] :: March 3, 2015, 12:33 p.m.

join.... CHICKEN HEAD or We Are RONIN.

[1945821] heehee3 [None] :: March 3, 2015, 1:17 p.m.

hot gamer wrote: »

join.... CHICKEN HEAD or We Are RONIN.

Wooo! Yes!

[1945873] ang1243 (GB1) [GB1] :: March 3, 2015, 3:33 p.m.

heehee3 wrote: »

Wooo! Yes!

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA................No

[1945879] heehee3 [None] :: March 3, 2015, 3:49 p.m.

ang1243 wrote: »

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHA................No

Ahahahahaha!

Dropping Roy's RVs while he hides under dove

Sir Winalot declared

U mad?

[1993301] Emporer Hagi (GB1) [None] :: June 10, 2015, midnight

Lol people get some rumours going out of nothing

[1993317] I AM SPARTA (GB1) [None] :: June 10, 2015, 12:45 a.m.

ang1243 wrote: »

http://prntscr.com/60uiiz

there not angus

[1993319] I AM SPARTA (GB1) [None] :: June 10, 2015, 12:51 a.m.

anyway he would be fine with any pw sharing alliance as its standard in the connected where he is now
i sent a message to there diplomat and got this in reply

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rg4wsof4ih1phxx/Screenshot%202015-06-10%2001.49.17.png?dl=0

[1993434] ang1243 (GB1) [GB1] :: June 10, 2015, 11:03 p.m.

I AM SPARTA wrote: »

there not angus

Was when I made that comment

[1995258] ParaREXX [None] :: June 14, 2015, 3:17 p.m.

[1995370] killdavies (GB1) [GB1] :: June 14, 2015, 8:59 p.m.

I AM SPARTA wrote: »

anyway he would be fine with any pw sharing alliance as its standard in the connected where he is now
i sent a message to there diplomat and got this in reply

https://www.dropbox.com/s/rg4wsof4ih1phxx/Screenshot%202015-06-10%2001.49.17.png?dl=0

Lols is that why the connected changed there name to The Saxons to try and avoid being noted as a multiaccounting alliance xD

Tut tut not ganna work connected...

[1995373] Highness Ho (GB1) [None] :: June 14, 2015, 9:19 p.m.

killdavies wrote: »

Lols is that why the connected changed there name to The Saxons to try and avoid being noted as a multiaccounting alliance xD

Tut tut not ganna work connected...

Nope, we just want a new start. That would be stupid otherwise. That message must have been old, and since then, people have been kicked.

[1995375] killdavies (GB1) [GB1] :: June 14, 2015, 9:30 p.m.

Highness Ho wrote: »

Nope, we just want a new start. That would be stupid otherwise. That message must have been old, and since then, people have been kicked.

Moleman7 hasn't been kicked and he admitted to me that he multi accounted to poach members... Opps was I not supposed to throw your leader under the bus?

[1995378] Highness Ho (GB1) [None] :: June 14, 2015, 9:34 p.m.

killdavies wrote: »

Moleman7 hasn't been kicked and he admitted to me that he multi accounted to poach members... Opps was I not supposed to throw your leader under the bus?

I said people. Not all people. Give us some time, we are changing.

[1995395] killdavies (GB1) [GB1] :: June 14, 2015, 10:03 p.m.

Highness Ho wrote: »

I said people. Not all people. Give us some time, we are changing.

Oh so you admit you still harbour multiaccounters and that your leader is one...

10/10 for your failing efforts of defending the connected

[1995400] Highness Ho (GB1) [None] :: June 14, 2015, 10:08 p.m.

killdavies wrote: »

Oh so you admit you still harbour multiaccounters and that your leader is one...

10/10 for your failing efforts of defending the connected

I did not admit we still harbor multis. Neither did I say Mole was one. I admit that this is a problem here, but we're rooting it out.

Oh and by the way, we're not The Connected anymore, we're The Saxons

[1995405] killdavies (GB1) [GB1] :: June 14, 2015, 10:27 p.m.

Highness Ho wrote: »

I did not admit we still harbor multis. Neither did I say Mole was one. I admit that this is a problem here, but we're rooting it out.

Oh and by the way, we're not The Connected anymore, we're The Saxons

But you acknowledge you have multi accounters...But your not harbouring them... Logic...

Meh call yourselves what ya want im going to and probably always will refer to you as the connected