Forum: empire-en
Board: [587] Alliance introductions & searches
Topic: [115857] Decent Alliances??
[1995406]
Highness Ho (GB1) [None]
:: June 14, 2015, 10:31 p.m.
killdavies wrote: »But you acknowledge you have multi accounters...But your not harbouring them... Logic...
Meh call yourselves what ya want im going to and probably always will refer to you as the connected
Do you think we are the only alliance in the server who has multis? If I could press a button to solve it, I would, but I can't. We are working to eliminate the problem, as I stated before......
Have fun calling us that and whatever else you call us
[1995422]
HawkRed (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 14, 2015, 10:48 p.m.
we're getting rid of the multi acconters; that's why we changed our name, a new start
[1995453]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 14, 2015, 11:14 p.m.
Highness Ho wrote: »Do you think we are the only alliance in the server who has multis? If I could press a button to solve it, I would, but I can't. We are working to eliminate the problem, as I stated before......
Have fun calling us that and whatever else you call us
Oh no I don't think your the only alliance that has multi accounters several do its just i have evidence of your alliance multiaccounting so you got the shit end of the stick so to speak and also if there was a button to kill all the multi accounts you would be leaderless and missing half of your members...
[1995454]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 14, 2015, 11:16 p.m.
pyromanica wrote: »we're getting rid of the multi acconters; that's why we changed our name, a new start
Ah but what encouraged this "new start" hmm? The past things the connected did isn't going to vanish because you changed your name and the past thing your members and leader aren't going to vanish either...
[1995538]
I AM SPARTA (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 2:02 a.m.
Highness Ho wrote: »Nope, we just want a new start. That would be stupid otherwise. That message must have been old, and since then, people have been kicked.
and with new start are you going to change from 1----1
98 in defence as well
[1995539]
ang1243 (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 2:04 a.m.
I AM SPARTA wrote: »and with new start are you going to change from 1----1
98 in defence as well
lol........
[1995681]
Highness Ho (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 10:20 a.m.
killdavies wrote: »Oh no I don't think your the only alliance that has multi accounters several do its just i have evidence of your alliance multiaccounting so you got the shit end of the stick so to speak and also if there was a button to kill all the multi accounts you would be leaderless and missing half of your members...
As you say, we have the "sh*t end of the stick", but there's a difference between us and you. We're admitting and trying to change, whereas I'm sure a few of your players are secretly multis, but hide behind the covers eh? Oh and by the way, please send me the evidence about how half the alliance does this hmm? As of two days ago, we have a no tolerance for multis or password sharing.
killdavies wrote: »Ah but what encouraged this "new start" hmm? The past things the connected did isn't going to vanish because you changed your name and the past thing your members and leader aren't going to vanish either...
What do you think encouraged it? We just want to hide and pretend it never happened?
Speak for yourself:I AM SPARTA wrote: »and with new start are you going to change from 1----1
98 in defence as well
http://prntscr.com/7h5p94
[1995691]
I AM SPARTA (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 10:59 a.m.
Speak for yourself:
http://prntscr.com/7h5p94[/QUOTE]
thank you for pointing that out only with us lately and he will get told off right away many thanks mean it, as not tolerated in our alliance at all.
http://prntscr.com/7h5p94[/QUOTE]
thank you for pointing that out only with us lately and he will get told off right away many thanks mean it, as not tolerated in our alliance at all.
[1995694]
I AM SPARTA (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 11:09 a.m.
Speak for yourself:
http://prntscr.com/7h5p94[/QUOTE]
highness i double checked at 100% spies it is dummies on wall see here which is fine by me
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pr7x86brvhxqa9q/Screenshot%202015-06-15%2012.06.28.png?dl=0
http://prntscr.com/7h5p94[/QUOTE]
highness i double checked at 100% spies it is dummies on wall see here which is fine by me
https://www.dropbox.com/s/pr7x86brvhxqa9q/Screenshot%202015-06-15%2012.06.28.png?dl=0
[1995706]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 11:37 a.m.
Highness Ho wrote: »As you say, we have the "sh*t end of the stick", but there's a difference between us and you. We're admitting and trying to change, whereas I'm sure a few of your players are secretly multis, but hide behind the covers eh? Oh and by the way, please send me the evidence about how half the alliance does this hmm? As of two days ago, we have a no tolerance for multis or password sharing.
What do you think encouraged it? We just want to hide and pretend it never happened?
Your openly accusing my alliance of multi accounting? Please show me this evidence and as for the half of your alliance multi account I was being a bit dramatic but seeing as you want proof of connected multi accounting heres the proof that moleman mulit accounts
http://prntscr.com/7h0mdm
Ha your alliance is going to need more than a name change to get a new start for people to forget you multi account
[1995743]
Highness Ho (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 12:53 p.m.
Lol, I was being a bit dramatic also, and probably should have said "I wouldn't be surprised if there were multis in your place". There's no way of tellingkilldavies wrote: »Your openly accusing my alliance of multi accounting? Please show me this evidence and as for the half of your alliance multi account I was being a bit dramatic but seeing as you want proof of connected multi accounting heres the proof that moleman mulit accounts
http://prntscr.com/7h0mdm
Ha your alliance is going to need more than a name change to get a new start for people to forget you multi account
I don't know what that conversation was entirely about, so not sure what to say. It does seem to state that he doesn't multi now.
It's more than a name change, and nobody has to forget that that was a problem. It won't be a problem in the future though, from now on.
[1995748]
Zenzer (INT2) [INT2]
:: June 15, 2015, 1:02 p.m.
No doubt! KON is your home! They will train you to become a serial killer.
[1995750]
Highness Ho (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 1:05 p.m.
Wrong server budHeroTheLegend wrote: »No doubt! KON is your home! They will train you to become a serial killer.
[1995796]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 2:12 p.m.
Highness Ho wrote: »Lol, I was being a bit dramatic also, and probably should have said "I wouldn't be surprised if there were multis in your place". There's no way of telling
I don't know what that conversation was entirely about, so not sure what to say. It does seem to state that he doesn't multi now.
It's more than a name change, and nobody has to forget that that was a problem. It won't be a problem in the future though, from now on.
Re read it "i don't multi that much anymore" so he does still multi but just not as much so therefore you must kick your own leader...
[1995802]
Highness Ho (GB1) [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 2:23 p.m.
Well, if it means he did multi, as of now he doesn't multikilldavies wrote: »Re read it "i don't multi that much anymore" so he does still multi but just not as much so therefore you must kick your own leader...
[1995830]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 3:10 p.m.
Highness Ho wrote: »Well, if it means he did multi, as of now he doesn't multi
But it clearly states he does multi a little now so he is still multiaccounting so he must step down and leave connected correct?
[1995831]
jollyjack82 [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 3:13 p.m.
Well, it's not multi accounting... It's a very good, and fair strategy for doing well. Can't you talk to players out of the game? Can't they tell you if you're under attack or vice versa?
Mustakeem... I attacked SnH a fair bit whilst you were in their wing. I tested on -Ares- too, yep, changed setup, massive support, unless you expect me to believe most your members will get up at 4am without fail for an attack? Nope, that's proof enough for me to safely say they pass-share
Why would I 'diss' my own alliance? Since we're not the ones pass-sharing. Or the fact that it's the alliance I'm in.
Sorry to crash your thread, Highness, but this guy... *subtle bump*
I know -ares- pw shares, he admitted it and I know somebody that's account got messed up by -ares-
[1995832]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 3:21 p.m.
jollyjack82 wrote: »I know -ares- pw shares, he admitted it and I know somebody that's account got messed up by -ares-
Everyone knows -ares- is a second account I cant remember whos though
[1995838]
Mustakeem [None]
:: June 15, 2015, 3:36 p.m.
-Ares- isn't a second account I know him, im not backing him up just because I was in his alliance its just the truth, I don't think he even likes me anymore lolkilldavies wrote: »Everyone knows -ares- is a second account I cant remember whos though
[1995842]
killdavies (GB1) [GB1]
:: June 15, 2015, 3:50 p.m.
-Ares- isn't a second account I know him, im not backing him up just because I was in his alliance its just the truth, I don't think he even likes me anymore lol
He is a second account or was I haven't spoken to him in a while