Forum: empire-en
Board: [590] Ideas, Suggestions & Feedback
Topic: [74639] Get Free Rubies
[1356875]
pirana23 [None]
:: May 12, 2012, 10:14 p.m.
What happens if you use all your money and rubies and you have nothing left
[1356876]
Taron2 [None]
:: May 12, 2012, 10:22 p.m.
What happens if you use all your money and rubies and you have nothing left
then you have no money or rubies left. nothing happens.
[1356886]
Itt2 [None]
:: May 13, 2012, 4:06 a.m.
You build a few more dwellings so that you can collect more taxes so that you can build more soldiers so that you can attack more robber barons so that you can collect more rubies.
[1356895]
bobbysbro [None]
:: May 13, 2012, 6:25 a.m.
Well this is never gonna happen of course... And you can collect some rubies through fighting Robber barons and completing quests.
what like 6 rubies from a robberbaro!!! i would like the event cos i dont buy rubies
[1356897]
NobleMukund [None]
:: May 13, 2012, 8 a.m.
the rubies should be tradeable for coins or resources.........but only fr a limited time period every week or month!!!
[1356898]
NewPlayer [None]
:: May 13, 2012, 8:41 a.m.
nice idea 
[1356926]
the champion [None]
:: May 13, 2012, 11:26 a.m.
everyone can get rubies somehow !!!!!!!! get a little job ( paper round ) or something and get a bank account and put money in to it its not hard if you really want to get rubies you can theres no excuse no matter how old you are!!!!!! im getting sick of people coming on to the forum and complaining about rubies how they are to expensive and shit like that your ruining this forum half the treads are another gay little idea on how people can get free rubies
i had to use my money what i earned to get the perks in this game with rubies so y would anyone else get them for free also the people who moan about rubies remember this its people like me that buy rubies make it even possibly for you to play this game so think before you moan about rubies
Finally someone who knows what he is talking about i agree completely, i am only 14 yet i still buy rubies
[1359562]
masterduke74 [None]
:: June 4, 2012, 1:56 a.m.
I am a non ruby user I bought some once thats it I would like the event thing to git free rubies when I get rubies I give them straight to the allliance
[1359601]
kumarn [None]
:: June 4, 2012, 1:48 p.m.
Rubies are supposed to give you an advantage, I agree with that.
But on the other hand there is a much better argument on the side of the people who don't pay for rubies.
The advantage for the people who pay for the rubies is too great.
You would need about 5 people higher level than you to get defeated if you were a ruby player and they weren't.
That is how big the gap is.
The ruby players who say that you should buy it or you are lazy and stuff like that should shut up themselves as they are in effect, bribing GGS in a nice way because they are paying for it.
And anyway, you don't get many rubies when you move up a level and you should get some when you attack someone else and win.
Eg. I battle someone who is level 30 and i am level 34 presume. I send 500 attack troops and because his army is away, he only has 200 there. I win the battle so I should get rubies by this formula
Rubies=army strength/enemy army strength+enemy casualties-my army's casualties.
Therefore if i lost 140 troops and he lost all his troops i would get (500/200)+200-140 which accounts to 62.5 or 63 rubies.
Therefore people who pay for rubies will still have to buy them as they won't get enough to sustain for all the ruby things they buy and the people who don't buy rubies can buy some ruby things that are cheap with the rubies taht tyehy get from the above battle method and the quests etc so the gap between the non-ruby players and the ruby players will be reduced and you will also start to think about attacking more because when you attack you will want to maximise the number of rubies that you get with the attack.
PS. I am a ruby player but I am neutral in this non ruby vs ruby thing and I only attack others when i get attacked otherwise I attack Robber Baron Castles.
But on the other hand there is a much better argument on the side of the people who don't pay for rubies.
The advantage for the people who pay for the rubies is too great.
You would need about 5 people higher level than you to get defeated if you were a ruby player and they weren't.
That is how big the gap is.
The ruby players who say that you should buy it or you are lazy and stuff like that should shut up themselves as they are in effect, bribing GGS in a nice way because they are paying for it.
And anyway, you don't get many rubies when you move up a level and you should get some when you attack someone else and win.
Eg. I battle someone who is level 30 and i am level 34 presume. I send 500 attack troops and because his army is away, he only has 200 there. I win the battle so I should get rubies by this formula
Rubies=army strength/enemy army strength+enemy casualties-my army's casualties.
Therefore if i lost 140 troops and he lost all his troops i would get (500/200)+200-140 which accounts to 62.5 or 63 rubies.
Therefore people who pay for rubies will still have to buy them as they won't get enough to sustain for all the ruby things they buy and the people who don't buy rubies can buy some ruby things that are cheap with the rubies taht tyehy get from the above battle method and the quests etc so the gap between the non-ruby players and the ruby players will be reduced and you will also start to think about attacking more because when you attack you will want to maximise the number of rubies that you get with the attack.
PS. I am a ruby player but I am neutral in this non ruby vs ruby thing and I only attack others when i get attacked otherwise I attack Robber Baron Castles.
[1359607]
Jaded Sky [None]
:: June 4, 2012, 3:06 p.m.
they could do what this other game does. they got a thing where you basically watch video ads for a small amount of credit everyday. takes like 2 weeks of video watching to get something like a week boost to resource production, but it allows the players to get paid items every so often and the company makes a little off of what would be an otherwise non paying customer. Think the place that does is called super rewards or selectable media.
[1359765]
Nirwemen [None]
:: June 6, 2012, 4:12 a.m.
Well this is never gonna happen of course... And you can collect some rubies through fighting Robber barons and completing quests.
What I'd like to see is that they make the ruby buildings also available to non-ruby players. This can be with a huge disadvantage to non-ruby players.
For example to build a lvl 1 bakery instead of paying 1250 rubies and waiting 2 hours. Non-ruby players could build that for 50.000 stone and 50.000 wood and 50 hours building time. The level 2 bakery for 100.000 stone and 100.000 wood and 100 hours building time (some other paying method is needed for that because storages are too small) and so on...
I know the numbers sound insane, but at least the building is available for non-ruby players and I don't think that for these amounts of resources ruby-players will become non-ruby players.
i agree with this but only players with the lvl 6 storage will be able to get 50000 stone and none of the players will be able to get 100000stone. perhaps they should have something like 10000 stone etc. and coins to build it... and of course, it will take a longer time
[1359767]
Nirwemen [None]
:: June 6, 2012, 4:15 a.m.
epictrollface wrote: »t0rn4d0's idea's definitely not going to happen, and Purplepancakes idea is good, there should be some way of earning rubies on certain occasions (e.g through competitions). This would be a good way for players who are good at the game but don't buy rubies (not me, I'm thinking of other people) to prove themselves and earn rubies...
well, GGE has approved your idea, we are going to have competitions soon!
[1359769]
Nirwemen [None]
:: June 6, 2012, 4:25 a.m.
Rubies are supposed to give you an advantage, I agree with that.
But on the other hand there is a much better argument on the side of the people who don't pay for rubies.
The advantage for the people who pay for the rubies is too great.
You would need about 5 people higher level than you to get defeated if you were a ruby player and they weren't.
That is how big the gap is.
The ruby players who say that you should buy it or you are lazy and stuff like that should shut up themselves as they are in effect, bribing GGS in a nice way because they are paying for it.
And anyway, you don't get many rubies when you move up a level and you should get some when you attack someone else and win.
Eg. I battle someone who is level 30 and i am level 34 presume. I send 500 attack troops and because his army is away, he only has 200 there. I win the battle so I should get rubies by this formula
Rubies=army strength/enemy army strength+enemy casualties-my army's casualties.
Therefore if i lost 140 troops and he lost all his troops i would get (500/200)+200-140 which accounts to 62.5 or 63 rubies.
Therefore people who pay for rubies will still have to buy them as they won't get enough to sustain for all the ruby things they buy and the people who don't buy rubies can buy some ruby things that are cheap with the rubies taht tyehy get from the above battle method and the quests etc so the gap between the non-ruby players and the ruby players will be reduced and you will also start to think about attacking more because when you attack you will want to maximise the number of rubies that you get with the attack.
PS. I am a ruby player but I am neutral in this non ruby vs ruby thing and I only attack others when i get attacked otherwise I attack Robber Baron Castles.
It's your choice but if you attack others if they attack you and if no one attacks you, you won't get far. Usually, i attack players only once unless they attack me.
[1360401]
craigyb [None]
:: June 12, 2012, 5:59 p.m.
]i think we dont get enough rubies by doing challenges.and we should be able to change our coins into a resonable amount of rubies (e.g. 1000 coins =750 rubies) which is good because coins are easy to get. i have like 9000 of em.
[1360408]
goku805 [None]
:: June 12, 2012, 7:21 p.m.
at least you have 3 i have 1
[1360413]
Aldreni-Warrior [None]
:: June 12, 2012, 8:34 p.m.
There must be a option: Earn Rubbies!
It was on GoodGameMafia so I guess it should be here too ^^!
It was on GoodGameMafia so I guess it should be here too ^^!
[1360419]
xtremehero10 [None]
:: June 12, 2012, 9:31 p.m.
hey what about a converter trade thing...you get coins all the time...how about trade coins for rubies...maybe like you can trade 5 coins for 1 ruby or something like that
[1360620]
bobbysbro [None]
:: June 14, 2012, 5:08 p.m.
Well this is never gonna happen of course... And you can collect some rubies through fighting Robber barons and completing quests.
What I'd like to see is that they make the ruby buildings also available to non-ruby players. This can be with a huge disadvantage to non-ruby players.
For example to build a lvl 1 bakery instead of paying 1250 rubies and waiting 2 hours. Non-ruby players could build that for 50.000 stone and 50.000 wood and 50 hours building time. The level 2 bakery for 100.000 stone and 100.000 wood and 100 hours building time (some other paying method is needed for that because storages are too small) and so on...
I know the numbers sound insane, but at least the building is available for non-ruby players and I don't think that for these amounts of resources ruby-players will become non-ruby players.
just wanted 2 say tahat the max lvl of storage is 62000 so u carnt have it as 100,000 stone/wood
[1360623]
Mxnman [None]
:: June 14, 2012, 5:37 p.m.
The way I see it as a Rubie player what you want GG to do is either decrease the advantage so less people buy Rubies so that's a no go. Make building more Expensive which they already £5 for a watch tower and you want to increase this so people who choose to spend there money have to pay more which is unfair.
Now I like the idea of a weekly event which did happen with the attack players for glory for Rubies coins and a Item if you were in the top free so that is happening but just making it harder of the rubie players is just harsh because we choose to spend money (I work for hours to afford these) while you might get another game or some thing else with that money so it just is rather unfair tbh with what some of you are suggesting in my opinion.
Now I like the idea of a weekly event which did happen with the attack players for glory for Rubies coins and a Item if you were in the top free so that is happening but just making it harder of the rubie players is just harsh because we choose to spend money (I work for hours to afford these) while you might get another game or some thing else with that money so it just is rather unfair tbh with what some of you are suggesting in my opinion.
[1361167]
McMuntface [None]
:: June 18, 2012, 7:02 p.m.
I considered buying rubies but decided it would prove far to expensive. I realise that this cannot be changed now without recompensating / annoying existing ruby abusers, making the situation difficult and t'would need be a gradual process. Even so (in my low income opinion) rubies are too expensive (including discount bonuses and whatnot) - I wonder how many more people would buy given a better price?
Also the competition idea is good and hence approved. Thankyou Mr. Herald! (am i confusing people yet?). I did think my 100 rubies / xxx coins (top 100) reward was a tad stingy though, considering the winning top 3 were very high level players and suspect ruby abusers.
Oh. And. Use. Sentences. Can't. Read. Well. Otherwise. Only. Kidding. Write. However. You. Want. Don't. Mean. To. Be. Patronizing. Or. Anything. Just. Annoying. LOLLOLLOL. It's. Just. That. I .Find. People. Difficult. To. Garble. Stand. Babble. Ghasp.
;(bleh..?
P.S. There seems to be many ways to waste rubies too. A fellow player when asked about the advantages of having a massive flag responded by saying non other than having a massive flag. So... why not pay your 4500 rubies for the privlige of flying the fat-ass banner that declares "I've been taken for a chump!"
I've also clicked various buttons by accident due to a slow connection.... E. to the friggin G. when i added an extra construction slot by accident - one stupid click and i'm down 625 or so rubies that i saved for ages and planned on spending more fruitfully. POO. Also origonally thought the extra constuction woiuld provide consecutive constructive powers. POO.
Now maybe i should read the game manual more carefully. or... maybe somebody should step thier game up. Thrice! Now I'm not pointing fingers but YOU KNOW WHO YOU BE!
Also the competition idea is good and hence approved. Thankyou Mr. Herald! (am i confusing people yet?). I did think my 100 rubies / xxx coins (top 100) reward was a tad stingy though, considering the winning top 3 were very high level players and suspect ruby abusers.
Oh. And. Use. Sentences. Can't. Read. Well. Otherwise. Only. Kidding. Write. However. You. Want. Don't. Mean. To. Be. Patronizing. Or. Anything. Just. Annoying. LOLLOLLOL. It's. Just. That. I .Find. People. Difficult. To. Garble. Stand. Babble. Ghasp.
;(bleh..?
P.S. There seems to be many ways to waste rubies too. A fellow player when asked about the advantages of having a massive flag responded by saying non other than having a massive flag. So... why not pay your 4500 rubies for the privlige of flying the fat-ass banner that declares "I've been taken for a chump!"
I've also clicked various buttons by accident due to a slow connection.... E. to the friggin G. when i added an extra construction slot by accident - one stupid click and i'm down 625 or so rubies that i saved for ages and planned on spending more fruitfully. POO. Also origonally thought the extra constuction woiuld provide consecutive constructive powers. POO.
Now maybe i should read the game manual more carefully. or... maybe somebody should step thier game up. Thrice! Now I'm not pointing fingers but YOU KNOW WHO YOU BE!