Forum: empire-en

Board: [817] War Updates

Topic: [343432] js7891 Battle Reports

[-343432] js7891 (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 9, 2017, 10:45 p.m.

he starved 7k lololol^^
dont judge my screenshotting skills bois

[4862266] Morentz (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 9, 2017, 10:48 p.m.

More like "js7891 vs TU"

Str8 up rambo'ing fools.

[4862281] gman3073 (US1) [None] :: Nov. 9, 2017, 11:43 p.m.

reported for abuse

[4862349] ravage1234 (US1) [None] :: Nov. 10, 2017, 4:46 a.m.

#ramboooo

[4862351] TannerM. (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 10, 2017, 4:55 a.m.

Crazy to think how much Lige taught you even though he was only here for 2 days.  

[4862759] fdfdssadsad3333 (US1) [None] :: Nov. 10, 2017, 7:25 p.m.

[4863342] billdo09 (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 12, 2017, 1:39 a.m.

sexy

[4863458] js7891 (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 12, 2017, 11:40 a.m.

[4863705] js7891 (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 12, 2017, 8:31 p.m.

[4863715] darkpanda (US1) (Banned) [None] :: Nov. 12, 2017, 9:09 p.m.

Flagged for abuse big ole bully

[4863747] UltimateJhon (GB1) [None] :: Nov. 12, 2017, 11:01 p.m.

abuse. 

[4863784] The Pacifist (US1) [None] :: Nov. 13, 2017, 3:34 a.m.

Nice work man. Keep at em.

[4864217] OxO (AU1) [AU1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 12:12 a.m.

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

[4864220] Apathy (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 12:21 a.m.

OxO (AU1) said:

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

sniping attackers in a war isn't a cheapshot, its disabling the enemy of being able to retaliate.   It's common strategy*


unless one is a pvp cuck*

[4864250] OxO (AU1) [AU1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 6:13 a.m.

Patriot1 (US1) said:

OxO (AU1) said:

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

sniping attackers in a war isn't a cheapshot, its disabling the enemy of being able to retaliate.   It's common strategy*


unless one is a pvp cuck*

Cheapshot

2. any mean action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person. 

I think sniping attackers counts as vulnerable lol. But yes, it is a strategy. If you could direct me to where I said it wasn't, much appreciated. It's a great strategy. Mass them and kill defence and attackers, so they can't defend themselves, others, or property, and take away their ability to fire back meaning they are literally and figuratively, fucked. Have I prove d I know what it is, lol? It's not like I killed 36k of someones imps \o/

[4864264] Morentz (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 8:39 a.m.

OxO (AU1) said:

Patriot1 (US1) said:

OxO (AU1) said:

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

sniping attackers in a war isn't a cheapshot, its disabling the enemy of being able to retaliate.   It's common strategy*


unless one is a pvp cuck*

Cheapshot

2. any mean action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person. 

I think sniping attackers counts as vulnerable lol. But yes, it is a strategy. If you could direct me to where I said it wasn't, much appreciated. It's a great strategy. Mass them and kill defence and attackers, so they can't defend themselves, others, or property, and take away their ability to fire back meaning they are literally and figuratively, fucked. Have I prove d I know what it is, lol? It's not like I killed 36k of someones imps \o/

TU alt detected.

[4864266] Friedrich IV (US1) [None] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 8:42 a.m.

Morentz (US1) said:

TU alt detected.

nah if he was a TU alt he'd be blaming me for all of GGS' updates...

[4864357] Bear Grills (US1) [None] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 2:28 p.m.

OxO (AU1) said:

Cheapshot

2. any mean action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person. 

I think sniping attackers counts as vulnerable lol. But yes, it is a strategy. If you could direct me to where I said it wasn't, much appreciated. It's a great strategy. Mass them and kill defence and attackers, so they can't defend themselves, others, or property, and take away their ability to fire back meaning they are literally and figuratively, fucked. Have I prove d I know what it is, lol? It's not like I killed 36k of someones imps \o/

Sure, I got a little bit of spare time this morning. I'll argue this point for the hell of it.

First off, let's post the full definition of 'cheap shot' that you acquired off the first page of Google. "any mean or unsportsmanlike remark or action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person." So in order for an attack on a 'defenseless or vulnerable person' to be considered a cheap shot, the first part of the definition must also be true. 

Nothing done during a war is mean, it's simply playing the game. The whole 'sport' of war is to attack each other and kill troops so there's nothing unsportsmanlike about it. Unsportsmanlike can be defined as 'violating the generally accepted rules of conduct.' I think killing troops in a war is generally accepted and it's definitely not breaking the GGS rules. I've never heard of a war where these types of attacks were considered unfair. A synonym of unsportsmanlike is dishonorable... well if you look at the snipe attacks posted above, every single battle besides one js gained honor (from the wins at least) so I think you could definitely call those battles honorable Just because the attacks were going to vulnerable places, doesn't mean they are 'cheap shots.' Cheap shots also require a mean or unsportsmanlike action, which is basically nothing in a game that is designed to just attack the crap out of each other 

One last note, if you could direct me to where Patriot said you didn't call it a strategy it would be much appreciated. Don't see the relevance of your last post whatsoever.


tl:dr: There are no cheap shots in war.

[4864809] Apathy (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 4:59 p.m.

OxO (AU1) said:

Patriot1 (US1) said:

OxO (AU1) said:

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

sniping attackers in a war isn't a cheapshot, its disabling the enemy of being able to retaliate.   It's common strategy*


unless one is a pvp cuck*

Cheapshot

2. any mean action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person. 

I think sniping attackers counts as vulnerable lol. But yes, it is a strategy. If you could direct me to where I said it wasn't, much appreciated. It's a great strategy. Mass them and kill defence and attackers, so they can't defend themselves, others, or property, and take away their ability to fire back meaning they are literally and figuratively, fucked. Have I prove d I know what it is, lol? It's not like I killed 36k of someones imps \o/

nowhere did you imply sniping was a strategy.

shall i hire @Herveus (AU1)  to show you what a cheapshot is?

[4865116] hionmentho (US1) [US1] :: Nov. 14, 2017, 5:37 p.m.

OxO (AU1) said:

Patriot1 (US1) said:

OxO (AU1) said:

A few look like cheap shots on attackers, but still 5k is still 5k lol. Nice

sniping attackers in a war isn't a cheapshot, its disabling the enemy of being able to retaliate.   It's common strategy*


unless one is a pvp cuck*

Cheapshot

2. any mean action, especially one directed at a defenseless or vulnerable person. 

I think sniping attackers counts as vulnerable lol. But yes, it is a strategy. If you could direct me to where I said it wasn't, much appreciated. It's a great strategy. Mass them and kill defence and attackers, so they can't defend themselves, others, or property, and take away their ability to fire back meaning they are literally and figuratively, fucked. Have I prove d I know what it is, lol? It's not like I killed 36k of someones imps \o/

You've proven to be an idiot, that's about it.