Forum: empire-en
Board: [817] War Updates
Topic: [346353] GB1 Server War
[4908523]
DISGRUNTLE (GB1) (Banned) [GB1]
:: Feb. 5, 2018, 3:24 p.m.
Nice hit Edd, Nice reps Ultra, Anyone else bored of listening to this John full of shit? Firstly it was we we we about CG, And continued with the we we we even after he was removed. Now its we we we about Odins even though im sure you wernt there when the war started, And have been proved to edit reports 
No offence but if i was in this war, I wouldnt be running off my mouth on forum, Id be attacking, Win or lose id be posting my reports, This thread is supposed to be updates on wars, Reports for the server to see and general discussions around the war. Not a thread for Jhon and Blitz to speculate on things that are happening in the war..... If im right.... Jhon was removed from CG and Blitz has left the war... So why continue to speculate about it.... Jhon why not do some attacks and show off your reps rather than sit on a forum talking about it? Its a war game... Not a rehab group we dont need to hear problems, You did this and i did that.... Just war facts and war reps would be nice
Personally i would like to see alot more reports, Its supposed to be a server war including atleast 5 alliances, Yet all i see is reports from Ultra, The odd reports from a few others and then a slander match..... Just saying.
No offence but if i was in this war, I wouldnt be running off my mouth on forum, Id be attacking, Win or lose id be posting my reports, This thread is supposed to be updates on wars, Reports for the server to see and general discussions around the war. Not a thread for Jhon and Blitz to speculate on things that are happening in the war..... If im right.... Jhon was removed from CG and Blitz has left the war... So why continue to speculate about it.... Jhon why not do some attacks and show off your reps rather than sit on a forum talking about it? Its a war game... Not a rehab group we dont need to hear problems, You did this and i did that.... Just war facts and war reps would be nice
Personally i would like to see alot more reports, Its supposed to be a server war including atleast 5 alliances, Yet all i see is reports from Ultra, The odd reports from a few others and then a slander match..... Just saying.
[4908525]
Spirit Bear (AU1) [None]
:: Feb. 5, 2018, 3:28 p.m.
I love this game 
[4908536]
Phantom Fury (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 5, 2018, 3:40 p.m.
UltraFlavoured (GB1) said:
thanks Ultra, I'm crap with these things lol
[4908566]
1 Fury (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 5, 2018, 5:19 p.m.
How do you post screenshots so they just show and not have a link
[4908597]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Feb. 5, 2018, 6:57 p.m.
when your on the link you copy and paste the image
[4909076]
husky (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 1:11 a.m.
Hello all
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
[4909128]
BraveKingofking (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 9:47 a.m.
yes well said husky, if you work for gge you should not be able to play in server wars or even be in alliance that is at the top cos you can cheat for them, get free troops for the team when you are losing the war,something needs to be done, there is shell account eveywhere and gge do nothing cos they buy to many rubies,taking ops like they did to me wich time and money was spent on something needs to be done about it.husky (GB1) said:Hello all
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
[4909160]
DaveHero0 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 11:21 a.m.
GGS will do nothing while the current situation makes them real moneyBraveKingofking (GB1) said:yes well said husky, if you work for gge you should not be able to play in server wars or even be in alliance that is at the top cos you can cheat for them, get free troops for the team when you are losing the war,something needs to be done, there is shell account eveywhere and gge do nothing cos they buy to many rubies,taking ops like they did to me wich time and money was spent on something needs to be done about it.husky (GB1) said:Hello all
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
Draw your own conclusions as to what players could do about that
[4909179]
marc58 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 12:22 p.m.
husky (GB1) said:Hello all
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
Wow there has been a lot of trash posted on this thread ( i may even have written some of it) But this has to be the winning ticket....wow never read so much tosh lol and more loll's just cant stop
[4909216]
Prince Brysie (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 2:39 p.m.
I don't normally save hits, but these two are my tops so far, haven't hit anything so big since, most likely never will again, back to just 5-7k hits if lucky
[4909244]
ang1243 (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 3:51 p.m.
Hey @husky (GB1)husky (GB1) said:Hello all
i don't post anything on forum but know i think i need to say something about what is going on and who rules this game
1st of all -in my opinion an moderator cannot play the game on the same server
2nd thing -how come all the time when CG is under pressure the server go down
probably most don't know this happen before when TRT was at war with CG
guess what -GGE gave a big compensation that time aswell but for some reason CG players could log in 30 min before TRT and mass TRT with those troops-not an excuse but the reality
this time when server went down i atacked Odins metro and after less then a min server went down -whats next ?
everyone know : odins and cg back to full strenght after 1 month when odins only tools swipe and rv steal (apart from Castle777)
but who am i to judge them thats their way to play
i lost 12k atackers (over 7k vets horrors which for a non rubies buyer are a lot) when server crash and lots of defenders ,sent a ticket to GGE which was answer by Josie (angus maybe ) saying they can't compensate me even if i provide the exact amount of troops i lost in each castle (sent a ticket few min after game back on)
what is funny or not is their answer for me which was really different from the one one of my CG friends got (wont tell his name because we are at war i know he suport me on this but can't say nothing for now but also know he sent a ticket to suport me on this matter)
3rd thing and last one -how come most of cg players are ex bsk players and now they play hard for the alliance who destroy their haven
provide GGE with proves about cg multi acc (from a player inside cg-believe it or not) and got a reply that they will investigate the matter -ever did and never will
the true will show up soon i think
meanwhile don't believe everything you see
I hope you'll allow me the courtesy of correcting some of the holes in the story above? I'm going to write all this without diving into the specific comments against my alliance in the game - as I'm sure that will be fleshed out by others without me confusing the point of view in which I'm posting from, so, you can consider this as a moderator speaking, regardless of the alliance I am in.
Firstly, I speak English - and really only English properly, so the only forum I could moderate effectively is the English (International) forum - this forum is not just for GB1, but also US1, INT1, INT2, AU1, NL1, Asia1, IN1, and any other server which doesn't have a specific forum with an active moderator - so technically we also cover servers like JP1, CN1, etc.
Based on the information above, I don't think it is fair to expect me to volunteer to moderate other forums - as this is really the only relevant one. If I wasn't allowed to play the game as a moderator - I'd probably not be able to work well as a moderator to be honest, as I wouldn't know much about the game!
Secondly, regarding the servers going down when you are at war with certain alliances - this could simply be the link between the number of complex movements being sent at any one point in time increases the load on the server - GGS being GGS may not anticipate these and therefore the server goes down as memory is filled up quickly and the server crashes.
In regards to your compensation package - you mention that you lost 12,000 attackers - everyone was credited with 15,000 horrors to compensate this? Surely that is plenty?
Here's a brief summary of things which I can confirm for you, and if you would like, I'm sure my fellow moderators can also confirm, here are their profile links if you wish to message them or mention them ( @BM Neroxnex @BM_Friedrich @BM QueenB
As a moderator:
- I cannot change anything in the game as support agents can (e.g. I can't credit myself with anything or remove anything from anyone else)
- In fact, I cannot influence anything that happens in the game except through passing on feedback for things to go into development
- I can change comments on the forum and remove posts, etc.
- I can ban and suspend people from the forum
- I cannot ban and suspend people from the game
- I can pass on feedback on behalf of the community, etc.
- I cannot change the decisions that the game design team make about features easily, etc.
- I am not employed by GGS, i.e. I have not signed a contract to say I work for them - it is voluntary, I have signed a document protecting personal information and information about future changes however - but as I say, I am not employed as a moderator - it is strictly voluntary.
[4909277]
1 Fury (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 5:28 p.m.
20,000 Quality Troops were no doubt beneficial for me and for the majority of players. But the very top players(Im talking the top100 on the server) have around 50,000+ Troops. As much of the top alliances were at war,its understandable they were sent out and fire casts left behind as you would rather defend wisely in a war . So people lost 50,000 troops and GGE just hands back 20k. How on earth is that fair? People from both sides will take weeks to rebuild to full strength. How can GGE just hand everyone a blank cheque.
As the owner and operator.GGE has to take responsibility for the server crashing and people losing their troops. People should have been given their troops back and given 10k troops as compensation for the server going down in the first place.
As the owner and operator.GGE has to take responsibility for the server crashing and people losing their troops. People should have been given their troops back and given 10k troops as compensation for the server going down in the first place.
[4909296]
Batten (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 6:16 p.m.
My experience within the war has been that a technical glitch killed in a two hour spell more troops than the opposing side had managed in the previous three weeks and I was relatively lucky. The GGE intervention whether by design, negligence or sheer chance had a significant impact at an individual player level and at an alliance level. Some players stepped out in protest, others stopped spending, some stopped playing entirely. A number saw it as an opportunity and sought to exploit it whilst others saw it as an injustice and sought to address. However you look at it, it changed the complexion of the conflict completely.
Players willing to play multiple accounts, to use shells or operating outside of the terms and conditions regardless or side gained a significant advantage from the game that others playing within the rules could not initially counter. That created a clear imbalance that changed momentum for individual players and created significant issues in a way that was beyond their control.
Just a bit sad that potentially a conflict and players experiences of it could be so badly effected by a glitch. Whilst replacement troops were nice a recognition from a Community member or member of GGE staff showing they are actually aware of what is happening in the game would have meant more. It's put some players in horrible positions who would never have faced the difficulties they currently face otherwise. And to all intents and purposes nobody has won really it just a really deflating and depressing reflection of how problematic and deeply flawed wars and PVP have now become.
I think the structure of conflicts between alliances need to be fundamentally changed because as it is compared to wars in the past it doesn't really seem to work that well for anyone and to be honest it is just a bit one paced and dull. I think GGE should be looking to allow the aggressor alliances at the beginning of a war to choose from a pre-set range of alliance war aims such as 75% win to loss ratio, 200,000 enemy troop kills, 50,000 friendly troop losses, COP capture, 300 battle wins, with popints or prizes if you achieve your chosen goals. Similarly the defending alliance could also be allowed to set their war aims, 200 successful defences, 15,000 attackers killed, COP retained. If you achieve the war aims fully you get prizes or points such as resources contributed to the alliances or prizes maybe that could be linked towards alliance city rewards as part of that process, or perhaps alliance titles like glory titles or like with Storm could be introduced.
Wars currently feel a bit like test cricket great if you have five days a whole summer to actively watch the test matches but if you have an active life you can't really get involved except by contributing to the highlights whilst hyperactive players or accounts played in rotation have the advantage of being able to live through the whole journey. In essence I think GGE should look at introduce the equivalent of limited overs wars. Three months of occasional hits by one or two really active players spending sums of money others can't match leads to loss of player interest, motivation and financially unsustainable play or in the case of things going badly an increased chance of players stepping outside of the rules or using frankly unrealistic bouncy castle style tactics. Given a greater flexibility and control over conflicts, a better gain, sense of achievement could help motivate people for longer and refocus the game on alliances contributing collectively rather than one or two dragging the rest behind them. That would intensify spend in my view rather than it trailing off as wars meander on without purpose for months at a time.
I'm guessing you might already moving in that direction but now feels to be a good time for players given current experience to contribute positively to improving something that feels old, clunky and out of control.
Players willing to play multiple accounts, to use shells or operating outside of the terms and conditions regardless or side gained a significant advantage from the game that others playing within the rules could not initially counter. That created a clear imbalance that changed momentum for individual players and created significant issues in a way that was beyond their control.
Just a bit sad that potentially a conflict and players experiences of it could be so badly effected by a glitch. Whilst replacement troops were nice a recognition from a Community member or member of GGE staff showing they are actually aware of what is happening in the game would have meant more. It's put some players in horrible positions who would never have faced the difficulties they currently face otherwise. And to all intents and purposes nobody has won really it just a really deflating and depressing reflection of how problematic and deeply flawed wars and PVP have now become.
I think the structure of conflicts between alliances need to be fundamentally changed because as it is compared to wars in the past it doesn't really seem to work that well for anyone and to be honest it is just a bit one paced and dull. I think GGE should be looking to allow the aggressor alliances at the beginning of a war to choose from a pre-set range of alliance war aims such as 75% win to loss ratio, 200,000 enemy troop kills, 50,000 friendly troop losses, COP capture, 300 battle wins, with popints or prizes if you achieve your chosen goals. Similarly the defending alliance could also be allowed to set their war aims, 200 successful defences, 15,000 attackers killed, COP retained. If you achieve the war aims fully you get prizes or points such as resources contributed to the alliances or prizes maybe that could be linked towards alliance city rewards as part of that process, or perhaps alliance titles like glory titles or like with Storm could be introduced.
Wars currently feel a bit like test cricket great if you have five days a whole summer to actively watch the test matches but if you have an active life you can't really get involved except by contributing to the highlights whilst hyperactive players or accounts played in rotation have the advantage of being able to live through the whole journey. In essence I think GGE should look at introduce the equivalent of limited overs wars. Three months of occasional hits by one or two really active players spending sums of money others can't match leads to loss of player interest, motivation and financially unsustainable play or in the case of things going badly an increased chance of players stepping outside of the rules or using frankly unrealistic bouncy castle style tactics. Given a greater flexibility and control over conflicts, a better gain, sense of achievement could help motivate people for longer and refocus the game on alliances contributing collectively rather than one or two dragging the rest behind them. That would intensify spend in my view rather than it trailing off as wars meander on without purpose for months at a time.
I'm guessing you might already moving in that direction but now feels to be a good time for players given current experience to contribute positively to improving something that feels old, clunky and out of control.
[4909317]
1 Fury (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 6:35 p.m.
Agree with the war objectives idea.Maybe would encourage wars to occur more regularly.Batten (GB1) said:
I think the structure of conflicts between alliances need to be fundamentally changed because as it is compared to wars in the past it doesn't really seem to work that well for anyone and to be honest it is just a bit one paced and dull. I think GGE should be looking to allow the aggressor alliances at the beginning of a war to choose from a pre-set range of alliance war aims such as 75% win to loss ratio, 200,000 enemy troop kills, 50,000 friendly troop losses, COP capture, 300 battle wins, with popints or prizes if you achieve your chosen goals. Similarly the defending alliance could also be allowed to set their war aims, 200 successful defences, 15,000 attackers killed, COP retained. If you achieve the war aims fully you get prizes or points such as resources contributed to the alliances or prizes maybe that could be linked towards alliance city rewards as part of that process, or perhaps alliance titles like glory titles or like with Storm could be introduced.
Wars currently feel a bit like test cricket great if you have five days a whole summer to actively watch the test matches but if you have an active life you can't really get involved except by contributing to the highlights whilst hyperactive players or accounts played in rotation have the advantage of being able to live through the whole journey. In essence I think GGE should look at introduce the equivalent of limited overs wars. Three months of occasional hits by one or two really active players spending sums of money others can't match leads to loss of player interest, motivation and financially unsustainable play or in the case of things going badly an increased chance of players stepping outside of the rules or using frankly unrealistic bouncy castle style tactics. Given a greater flexibility and control over conflicts, a better gain, sense of achievement could help motivate people for longer and refocus the game on alliances contributing collectively rather than one or two dragging the rest behind them. That would intensify spend in my view rather than it trailing off as wars meander on without purpose for months at a time.
I'm guessing you might already moving in that direction but now feels to be a good time for players given current experience to contribute positively to improving something that feels old, clunky and out of control.
[4909319]
husky (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 6:40 p.m.
Ang1234 if you tell me you do all this voluntary without any benefits i believe you
[4909330]
samasensei (ASIA1) [ASIA1]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 7:20 p.m.
Thats how odins are, just get a fire cast and join war , steal rvs back, if odins players are going to capture rvs at late night and drop them so that neutrals can cap them then they shouldnt be complaining when the same thing happens the other way.jojokin (GB1) said:I am fed up with odins claiming free rvs were once theirs then telling us we ought to simply not take any free rvs until they deign to finish their war.....making more enemies they are....arrogance
obviously its up to you if you want to involve yourself, castles will burn lool
[4909369]
husky (GB1) [None]
:: Feb. 7, 2018, 9:08 p.m.
one more and will let you enjoy the game
last week got threaten by 2 CG general that they will cap my ops
took like a joke but then realise that one of the players who said that is Littleliam
for them who may not know who is Littleliam just few things:
-1st server war was a BSK wm who manage with his multi acc to infiltrate players in TRT and some of the alliances taking part
-then he sell BSK to CG and they destroyed BSK
-now is a CG general with acc Joooz
-thats amazing
well done Littleliam
2 days ago find out myself with new neighbour Adlerund in love (probably of me ) so probably all those evidence against cg are real
and still dont think Ang should play this game
got over 40 messages after post on forum
8 against about what i post 1st time
enjoy the game
last week got threaten by 2 CG general that they will cap my ops
took like a joke but then realise that one of the players who said that is Littleliam
for them who may not know who is Littleliam just few things:
-1st server war was a BSK wm who manage with his multi acc to infiltrate players in TRT and some of the alliances taking part
-then he sell BSK to CG and they destroyed BSK
-now is a CG general with acc Joooz
-thats amazing
well done Littleliam
2 days ago find out myself with new neighbour Adlerund in love (probably of me ) so probably all those evidence against cg are real
and still dont think Ang should play this game
got over 40 messages after post on forum
8 against about what i post 1st time
enjoy the game
[4909411]
Friedrich IV (US1) [None]
:: Feb. 8, 2018, 12:06 a.m.
re moderators not playing the game -
we aren't paid GGS employees, we're volunteers. How do you expect to get volunteers to moderate the forums without costing GGS money if they can't actually play the game?
Quite to the contrary, I think GGE devs SHOULD play the game, so they could see the far-reaching changes their seemingly arbitrary decision-making has on actual players.
we aren't paid GGS employees, we're volunteers. How do you expect to get volunteers to moderate the forums without costing GGS money if they can't actually play the game?
Quite to the contrary, I think GGE devs SHOULD play the game, so they could see the far-reaching changes their seemingly arbitrary decision-making has on actual players.
[4909424]
Sikreb (GB1) [GB1]
:: Feb. 8, 2018, 1:37 a.m.
Evening... I do not post often but thought maybe I should say a few words
Odins Fury were declared on by 3 alliances technically.... but 4 alliances to those with half a brain cell, regardless of who pressed the button..... So any words of fair play fall upon deaf ears as far as we are concerned... its comical that fair play is mentioned at all
Its brilliant to think that these alliances intended on ruining Odins Fury and to look at where they stand now... desperate claims... seeking out any arguement possible to get 1 up.... words can be shared till peeps are blue in the face, power points/pro mode/members dropped/red or black dots/troop losses are all the evidence needed to see who is on top... and who made a mistake in joining in a war they knew little about
Alot of moaning going on... half those have run off which is brilliant and embarrassing.... many more in pro... also alot of conspiracy talk which is just weak, I would be embarrassed to even consider this, such a cute+flattering attempt to justify your downfall... this is war, it is what it is... all alliances have the same buttons, the same troops, the same opportunities
Odins Fury will do whatever is necessary.... If it can be done it will be done
To anyone reading who is part of the war and is wondering whats next, your leader only needs to request peace and admit that going 4vs1 initially was a big mistake.... then you can go back to playing the game the way you play.... we are merciful and respect many who have taken part
Odins Fury were declared on by 3 alliances technically.... but 4 alliances to those with half a brain cell, regardless of who pressed the button..... So any words of fair play fall upon deaf ears as far as we are concerned... its comical that fair play is mentioned at all
Its brilliant to think that these alliances intended on ruining Odins Fury and to look at where they stand now... desperate claims... seeking out any arguement possible to get 1 up.... words can be shared till peeps are blue in the face, power points/pro mode/members dropped/red or black dots/troop losses are all the evidence needed to see who is on top... and who made a mistake in joining in a war they knew little about
Alot of moaning going on... half those have run off which is brilliant and embarrassing.... many more in pro... also alot of conspiracy talk which is just weak, I would be embarrassed to even consider this, such a cute+flattering attempt to justify your downfall... this is war, it is what it is... all alliances have the same buttons, the same troops, the same opportunities
Odins Fury will do whatever is necessary.... If it can be done it will be done
To anyone reading who is part of the war and is wondering whats next, your leader only needs to request peace and admit that going 4vs1 initially was a big mistake.... then you can go back to playing the game the way you play.... we are merciful and respect many who have taken part
[4909439]
Spirit Bear (AU1) [None]
:: Feb. 8, 2018, 4:25 a.m.
Google Sikreb answer is funny did you know Oddbins have a Bible?!