Forum: empire-en
Board: [584] Players ask Players
Topic: [75714] Questions
[1629286]
123guy [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:18 p.m.
I have changed my password several time but a diffrent player keeps getting into my account, how do i stop this
Are you sure someone is logging in? Have you told anyone your password?
[1629289]
dueltheabdul (INT1) [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:21 p.m.
Are you sure someone is logging in? Have you told anyone your password?
Well he did say that he changed his password multiple times, so I don't he would have told his friend. Maybe you left the game open somewhere and forgot to logoff
[1629291]
Donley45 [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:23 p.m.
My leader wanted it so he could send def troops out of my castle if i was off line, did i screw up
[1629293]
UrbaneCrib0 [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:27 p.m.
My leader wanted it so he could send def troops out of my castle if i was off line, did i screw up
Yes, bad decision. Your leader shouldn't want them anyways, he should be busy.
[1629295]
Donley45 [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:30 p.m.
I gave him my first password, have change since but he still gets in. Nothing i can do?
[1629297]
123guy [None]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:33 p.m.
Report him to support.
[1629298]
Molson Beer (US1) [US1]
:: Sept. 12, 2013, 8:35 p.m.
I gave him my first password, have change since but he still gets in. Nothing i can do?
Password sharing is against the rules,so you could be banned along with him.
[1629405]
UrbaneCrib0 [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 1:10 a.m.
Password sharing is against the rules,so you could be banned along with him.
I don't think that they would do that, but still contact support and tell them the true story.
[1629412]
dueltheabdul (INT1) [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 1:15 a.m.
UrbaneCrib0 wrote: »I don't think that they would do that, but still contact support and tell them the true story.
Why wouldn't they? Obviously the both of them have broken the rules and they both deserve to be punished for that. The only reason may think of for support to forgive them would be because of their honesty. However, the honesty came not because they wanted to be honest but because the player didn't know that it was against the rules.
So they both do deserve to be punished.
[1629413]
UrbaneCrib0 [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 1:17 a.m.
dueltheabdul wrote: »Why wouldn't they? Obviously the both of them have broken the rules and they both deserve to be punished for that. The only reason may think of for support to forgive them would be because of their honesty. However, the honesty came not because they wanted to be honest but because the player didn't know that it was against the rules.
So they both do deserve to be punished.
If he told the truth and is right then only the leader deserves to be punished. The member who gave the password was unaware and deceived.
[1629417]
dueltheabdul (INT1) [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 1:21 a.m.
UrbaneCrib0 wrote: »If he told the truth and is right then only the leader deserves to be punished. The member who gave the password was unaware and deceived.
Yes, but ignorance does not give you immunity from the law. He should have known that it was against the rules. And the leader can then say that he didn't know and everyone else who breaks a rule will say they didn't know and nobody will get punished.
Maybe, he should not be punished as severely.
On a side note, why are we arguing about this? It's not as if we decide who gets punished and it's not as if support will listen to us.
[1629425]
UrbaneCrib0 [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 1:33 a.m.
dueltheabdul wrote: »Yes, but ignorance does not give you immunity from the law. He should have known that it was against the rules. And the leader can then say that he didn't know and everyone else who breaks a rule will say they didn't know and nobody will get punished.
Maybe, he should not be punished as severely.
On a side note, why are we arguing about this? It's not as if we decide who gets punished and it's not as if support will listen to us.
This is just a game so there shouldn't be a "law" to punish him. Anyway your right, we don't decide and this is off track of the thread.
[1629586]
fire~girl [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 5:49 p.m.
Ok I made it to level 30--Yippeeee 
On the map of the ones still locked with the BurningSands and FirePeaks, the one with the clouds was unlocked but there is nothing there yet, but I haven't seen a task to open it yet. Is it with the 3rd outpost or something with the icemap? Not sure about what it is LOL.
On the map of the ones still locked with the BurningSands and FirePeaks, the one with the clouds was unlocked but there is nothing there yet, but I haven't seen a task to open it yet. Is it with the 3rd outpost or something with the icemap? Not sure about what it is LOL.
[1629588]
123guy [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 5:51 p.m.
Ok I made it to level 30--Yippeeee
On the map of the ones still locked with the BurningSands and FirePeaks, the one with the clouds was unlocked but there is nothing there yet, but I haven't seen a task to open it yet. Is it with the 3rd outpost or something with the icemap? Not sure about what it is LOL.
Its the berimond event, not a permanent kingdom. If you see the 'Grimbert's oath' or 'Leopolds Gratitude' decorative items, that player has won in berimond.
[1629596]
fire~girl [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 5:58 p.m.
Thanks:
oh ok so make attack soliders? similar to the Khan event that is going now?
oh ok so make attack soliders? similar to the Khan event that is going now?
[1629599]
123guy [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 6:04 p.m.
Thanks:
oh ok so make attack soliders? similar to the Khan event that is going now?
Its very different. For starters, it does not take place on a normal world map. it takes place in berimond. You choose a faction, and the two sides fight. The bears vs the lions. You have a camp and earn strong troops by capturing other camps and destroying watchtowers. At the end, the side with the most domination wins and keep their troops. You sometimes get equipment, sometimes a deco. Its good, but its always riddles with little glitches.
[1629600]
jackpm12 [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 6:05 p.m.
why dont you make rubie mines for players maby it starts with 1 rubie per day then when you upgrade it on level 14 you get 5 rubies per day then you upgrade it on level 25 and get 10 rubies per day then you ant upgrade it.
p.s you should be ablle to trade wood food or stone for coins and trade coins for rubies
p.s you should be ablle to trade wood food or stone for coins and trade coins for rubies
[1629604]
Unknown
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 6:12 p.m.
why dont you make rubie mines for players maby it starts with 1 rubie per day then when you upgrade it on level 14 you get 5 rubies per day then you upgrade it on level 25 and get 10 rubies per day then you ant upgrade it.
p.s you should be ablle to trade wood food or stone for coins and trade coins for rubies
10 rubies a day to make the total receive of 90,000 you would need 9000 days logged in.thats over 24 and a half years!
trade wood food stone for coins is already available.barterer.second coins for rubies will never be impleted.
[1629635]
123guy [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 7:16 p.m.
be the best wrote: »10 rubies a day to make the total receive of 90,000 you would need 9000 days logged in.thats over 24 and a half years!
trade wood food stone for coins is already available.barterer.second coins for rubies will never be impleted.
I think you mis-understood the ruby mines bit. He is suggesting for one to be put in (not realising there is one already, that gives 10 rubies per day. No mention of a cost or limit.
[1629753]
Trrri [None]
:: Sept. 13, 2013, 11:43 p.m.
How do I find my questions and see if anybody answered